⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 9 cm — The scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is PQ ÷ AB = 12 ÷ 8 = 1.5. So PR = AC × 1.5 = 6 × 1.5 = 9 cm. (4 cm comes from using the scale factor upside down, AB ÷ PQ; 10 cm comes from adding the difference between AB and PQ, 4 cm, to AC instead of scaling; 16 cm comes from multiplying PQ by the ratio AB : AC instead of scaling AC by the correct scale factor.)
2. (d) 15:20 — Method: add all three journey segments to the departure time, converting the total number of minutes into hours and minutes. Working: 55 + 20 + 40 = 115 minutes = 1 hour 55 minutes. 13:25 + 1 hour 55 minutes = 15:20. Answer: 15:20. (15:00 comes from leaving out the 20 minute break and adding only 55 + 40 = 95 minutes. 14:25 comes from leaving out the 55 minute first leg and adding only 20 + 40 = 60 minutes. 14:40 comes from leaving out the 40 minute second leg and adding only 55 + 20 = 75 minutes.)
3. (a) 150 bulbs — Method: assume the proportion faulty in a random sample is the proportion faulty in the whole day's output, and scale the sample up to the population. Working: the sample of 80 has to be scaled up to 4,000 bulbs, and 4,000 ÷ 80 = 50, so the day's output is 50 sample-sized batches. Each batch is expected to contain the same 3 faulty bulbs, so the estimate is 3 × 50 = 150. Answer: 150 bulbs, and it is an estimate, because another sample of 80 would probably contain a different number of faulty bulbs. The distractors: 50 bulbs is the scale factor 4,000 ÷ 80 written down as though it were the answer, so it reports how many batches there are rather than how many faulty bulbs; 120 bulbs comes from reading 3 out of 80 as 3%, then taking 0.03 × 4,000 = 120, but 3 out of 80 is 3.75%; 240 bulbs comes from 3 × 80 = 240, multiplying the faulty bulbs by the size of the sample instead of by the scale factor, which uses the 80 twice and the 4,000 not at all.
4. (d) 6π — 4π and 2π are like terms, both multiples of π, so they combine by adding their coefficients: 4 + 2 = 6, giving 6π. Multiplying the coefficients instead of adding them, 4 × 2 = 8, gives 8π. Treating the combination as if the two π's multiplied together as well as the coefficients gives 6π². Dropping the π altogether and adding only the coefficients gives 6.
5. (d) 5/9 — Total parts = 2 + 3 + 4 = 9. Flowers and herbs together make up 2 + 3 = 5 parts, so the fraction that is not vegetables is 5/9. 4/9 comes from finding the fraction of vegetables instead of the fraction that is not vegetables. 5/7 comes from leaving flowers out of the total and using only herbs and vegetables, 3 + 4 = 7, as the total. 3/4 comes from writing the ratio of herbs to vegetables directly as a fraction.
6. (c) I is the same distance from all three sides. — The angle bisector from A is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and AC, and the angle bisector from B is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and BC. Point I lies on both bisectors, so I is equidistant from AB and AC, and also equidistant from AB and BC — meaning I is the same distance from all three sides. (Being the same distance from all three vertices instead describes the circumcentre, found from the perpendicular bisectors of the sides, not the angle bisectors; I being the midpoint of AB confuses the angle bisector construction with the perpendicular bisector of a side; I lying on side AC is wrong because the angle bisectors meet inside the triangle, not on one of its sides.)
7. (c) 450 g — Method: use the amount of butter given to find the value of one part of the ratio, then find the mass of flour, and finally add flour and butter to get the total. Working: 180 g of butter is 2 parts, so one part is 180 ÷ 2 = 90 g. The flour is 3 parts, so 3 × 90 = 270 g, and the total mass is 270 + 180 = 450 g. So the baker can make 450 g of pastry. Distractor 270 g is only the mass of flour, forgetting to add the butter back on. Distractor 300 g comes from treating the 180 g as 3 parts instead of 2, swapping which ratio number matches the butter. Distractor 540 g comes from multiplying 180 by 3 directly instead of first finding the value of one part.
8. (a) 2 — Method: systematically try each possible number of 20p coins, starting from one, and check whether the amount left over can be made exactly using whole 10p coins. Working: one 20p coin leaves 40p, made from four 10p coins — valid. Two 20p coins leave 20p, made from two 10p coins — valid. Three 20p coins leave 0p, which needs zero 10p coins — not valid, since at least one 10p coin is required. So there are 2 different ways. Answer: 2. 3 comes from counting the case of three 20p coins and no 10p coins as if it were allowed, even though at least one 10p coin is required. 4 comes from ignoring the 'at least one of each' condition altogether and counting every way of making 60p, including three 20p coins with no 10p coins and six 10p coins with no 20p coins. 1 comes from finding only one of the two valid combinations and stopping the systematic list too early.
9. (d) 180 — Method: bearings are measured clockwise from north and written using three figures. Working: south is a half turn (180°) clockwise from north. A student who answers 090 has confused south with east. A student who answers 270 has confused south with west. A student who answers 018 has written the correct digits in the wrong order. Answer: 180.
10. (d) Yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6 — Method: two ratios are equal when their cross-products are equal, so multiply the first part of each ratio by the second part of the other. Working: 4 × 9 = 36 and 6 × 6 = 36; the two products match, so the ratios are equal, and simplifying both to 2:3 shows the same thing. Answer: yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6. The distractors: the reason that the number 6 appears in both ratios reaches the right verdict from a surface match, since a figure shared by two ratios says nothing about equivalence — 4:6 and 6:5 share a 6 and are not equal; the reason built on 9 − 6 and 6 − 4 compares the differences inside each ratio, 3 against 2, which is additive thinking and ends at a verdict of no; the reason built on 4 × 6 and 6 × 9 multiplies the two parts of each ratio together instead of across the pair, giving 24 against 54 and again a verdict of no.
11. (c) 3:4 — The jacket costs 3/7 of £84, which is 3 × (84 ÷ 7) = 3 × 12 = £36. The bag then costs the rest of the money, £84 − £36 = £48. The ratio of the jacket to the bag is 36:48, which simplifies to 3:4. Writing the fraction spent on the jacket, 3/7, directly as the ratio, without working out that the bag's share is the remaining 4/7, gives 3:7. Giving the ratio the wrong way round, bag to jacket instead of jacket to bag, gives 4:3. Assuming the jacket and bag cost the same, ignoring the fraction given, gives 1:1.
12. (a) 360 — The inverse of ÷ 15 is × 15, so the missing number is 24 × 15 = 360. Subtracting instead of multiplying gives 24 − 15 = 9. Dividing by 15 again instead of multiplying gives 24 ÷ 15 = 1.6. Adding instead of multiplying gives 24 + 15 = 39.