⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 10 — Method: substitute the value of x, then follow the order of operations, carrying out the multiplication before the subtraction. Working: with x = 4 the rule reads y = 3 × 4 − 2; the multiplication gives 3 × 4 = 12, and taking 2 away gives 12 − 2. Answer: y = 10. The distractors: 14 comes from adding the 2 instead of subtracting it; 12 comes from working out 3 × 4 and stopping there, leaving the −2 unused; 6 comes from subtracting first, 4 − 2, and multiplying the result by 3.
2. (d) Isla is right, because 5 + 1 = 6 — Method: put the input through the machine yourself, then compare what comes out with the output claimed, and check that the reason given with the verdict is itself true. Working: the machine adds 1 to whatever is put in, so an input of 5 gives 5 + 1 = 6, which is exactly the output claimed. Answer: Isla is right, and the reason is that 5 + 1 = 6. The distractors: the statement that the machine adds 1 to its output describes a different machine — this one adds 1 to what goes in — so the verdict is right but the reason is false; 5 − 1 = 4 comes from running the machine backwards and subtracting instead of adding; 5 × 1 = 5 comes from reading ‘adds 1’ as ‘multiplies by 1’, which leaves the input unchanged.
3. (d) 60 — Method: 75% is three quarters, so divide by 4 to find one quarter and then multiply by 3. Working: 80 ÷ 4 = 20 for one quarter, and 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60 milk chocolates. The distractors: 20 is one quarter of 80, which is 25% and not 75%; 55 comes from subtracting 25 from 80 rather than taking 25% of 80 away from it; 75 comes from quoting the percentage itself as a number of chocolates.
4. (d) Yes: the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. — Method: find the 8th term by subtracting 8 a total of 7 times from the first term, since the 1st term itself needs 0 subtractions. Working: 8th term = 50 − 8 × 7 = 50 − 56 = −6, which is negative, so Priya is correct. Answer: Yes, the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. The "50 − 8 × 6 = 2" option subtracts 8 only six times instead of seven, an off-by-one error in counting the steps. The "50 − 8 × 8 = −14" option subtracts 8 eight times instead of seven, the opposite off-by-one error. The claim that repeated subtraction "can never go negative" ignores that subtracting enough times from any starting value eventually gives a negative result.
5. (a) 8 — A cylinder has two flat circular faces (the top and the base) and one curved surface, so only its 2 flat faces are wrapped. A cuboid has 6 faces and all of them are flat, so all 6 are wrapped. Adding these: 2 + 6 = 8, so 8 is correct. 9 comes from wrongly counting the cylinder's curved surface as a flat face. 6 comes from counting only the cuboid and forgetting the cylinder's two flat circular faces. 3 comes from counting only the cylinder and including its curved surface in that total.
6. (d) 4x + 5 — A minus sign directly before a bracket changes the sign of both terms inside it: 6x − (2x − 5) = 6x − 2x + 5 = 4x + 5. The option 4x − 5 comes from only changing the sign of the 2x term and not the −5, giving 6x − 2x − 5. The option 8x − 5 comes from adding 2x instead of subtracting it, as if the minus sign did not apply to the bracket, giving 6x + 2x − 5. The option 8x + 5 repeats that same addition mistake and also changes the sign of the −5 term.
7. (c) £7617.60 — To decrease by 8% each year, multiply by 0.92 (100% − 8%) twice. £9000 × 0.92 × 0.92 = £7617.60. £7560.00 comes from treating the two 8% decreases as a single flat 16% decrease applied once instead of compounding: £9000 × 0.84 = £7560.00. £8280.00 comes from applying the 8% decrease only once, for 1 year instead of 2: £9000 × 0.92 = £8280.00. £10497.60 comes from multiplying by 1.08 twice, increasing the value instead of decreasing it: £9000 × 1.08 × 1.08 = £10497.60.
8. (b) 0.3, 32%, 7/20 — Method: convert every number to a decimal so they can be compared on the same scale. Working: 7/20 = 0.35, 0.3 stays as 0.3, and 32% = 0.32. Comparing 0.3, 0.32 and 0.35 in size gives the order 0.3, then 0.32, then 0.35. Answer: 0.3, 32%, 7/20. 7/20, 32%, 0.3 lists the numbers from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. 0.3, 7/20, 32% swaps 32% and 7/20, treating the fraction 7/20 as smaller even though 7/20 = 0.35 is bigger than 32% = 0.32. 32%, 0.3, 7/20 comes from moving the digits one place too far when converting the percentage, giving 0.032 instead of 0.32, which makes 32% look far smaller than it really is.
9. (c) (10.5, −2) — Method: the vector from the first tile to the third tile is the pattern's vector doubled, since two translations happen between them. Working: doubling (4.5, −2.5) gives (9, −5); adding this to the starting corner (1.5, 3) gives x-coordinate 1.5 + 9 = 10.5 and y-coordinate 3 − 5 = −2. Answer: (10.5, −2). A candidate who only applies the vector once, translating to the second tile instead of the third, gets (6, 0.5). A candidate who adds 2.5 instead of subtracting it in the y-coordinate gets (10.5, 8). A candidate who doubles the x-part of the vector correctly but forgets to change the y-coordinate at all gets (10.5, 3).
10. (d) 25% — Method: to convert a decimal to a percentage, multiply by 100. Working: 0.25 × 100 = 25. Answer: 25%. The distractors: 0.25% comes from writing a percent sign after the decimal without multiplying; 2.5% comes from multiplying by 10 instead of 100; 250% comes from multiplying by 1000.
11. (c) 170 — 68% of the 250 packets germinated: 250 × 0.68 = 170. Using the complement, the 32% that did NOT germinate, gives 250 × 0.32 = 80. Shifting the decimal point, using 0.068 instead of 0.68, gives 250 × 0.068 = 17. Rounding 68% up to 70% before multiplying gives 250 × 0.70 = 175.
12. (b) 1:3 — Let the number who cycle be 1 part. Since 3 times as many pupils walk, the number who walk is 3 parts. The ratio of cycle to walk is 1:3. (3:1 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, walk to cycle. 1:4 comes from treating “3 times as many” as “3 more”, so walk = cycle + 3, giving parts 1 and 4. 3:4 comes from comparing the number who walk with the total number of pupils, 3 parts out of 4 parts altogether, instead of comparing cycle with walk.)