⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 26 — Method: a line of best fit lets one quantity be predicted from the other, so the score is substituted into the equation of the line and the resulting inequality is solved for the number of hours. Working: a score of at least 80 means 2.5x + 15 ≥ 80; taking 15 from both sides gives 2.5x ≥ 65, and dividing both sides by 2.5 gives x ≥ 26, so the least whole number of hours is 26. Checking, 2.5 × 26 + 15 = 80, which does reach the target. Answer: 26 hours — and this is only an estimate, because a line of best fit predicts a trend rather than an individual result, and a prediction made outside the range of hours the pupils actually revised for would be an extrapolation and less reliable still. The distractors: 27 comes from reaching 26 and then rounding up again, although 26 hours already gives a score of exactly 80; 32 comes from 80 ÷ 2.5, which ignores the 15 in the equation of the line; 38 comes from (80 + 15) ÷ 2.5, that is from adding the 15 instead of subtracting it when rearranging.
2. (c) Trapezium — A trapezium is defined as a quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides.
3. (b) 6 m — Volume of a cuboid = length × width × height, so height = volume ÷ (length × width) = 360 ÷ (12 × 5) = 360 ÷ 60 = 6 m. A pupil who divides the volume by the length only gets 360 ÷ 12 = 30 m. A pupil who divides the volume by the width only gets 360 ÷ 5 = 72 m. A pupil who subtracts length × width from the volume instead of dividing gets 360 − 60 = 300 m. The correct height is 6 m.
4. (a) 3y² — 'y squared, multiplied by 3' means the square is applied to y only, and the result is then multiplied by 3, written as 3y². Writing y³ mistakes the multiplication by 3 for an extra factor of y, adding to the power instead of using a coefficient. Writing (3y)² squares the whole of 3y, including the 3, which gives 9y² rather than 3y² — the square should apply to y alone. Writing 3 + y² adds the 3 instead of multiplying by it. The expression for 'y squared, multiplied by 3' is 3y².
5. (b) 0.225 — The relative frequency of rain is the number of rainy days out of all days recorded: 9 ÷ 40 = 0.225, which is noticeably less than the forecaster's claimed 0.3. Using the number of dry days, 40 − 9 = 31, as the denominator instead of the total of 40 gives 9 ÷ 31 = 0.29 (2 d.p.). Simply reporting the forecaster's claimed value, 0.3, without calculating anything from the data at all, ignores the recorded results completely. Misplacing the decimal point, treating 9 out of 40 as 9%, gives 0.09 instead of 0.225.
6. (d) £33.00 — The profit is 3/8 of £24 = (£24 ÷ 8) × 3 = £3 × 3 = £9.00. Selling price = £24 + £9.00 = £33.00. A candidate who gives the profit instead of the selling price gets £9.00. A candidate who subtracts the profit instead of adding it gets £24 − £9 = £15.00. A candidate who works out one eighth of £24 and adds that on, forgetting to multiply by the numerator 3, gets £24 + £3 = £27.00.
7. (d) 37.0 — C = 5(98.6 − 32) ÷ 9 = 5 × 66.6 ÷ 9 = 333 ÷ 9 = 37.0. A candidate who forgets to subtract 32 first gets 5 × 98.6 ÷ 9 = 54.8 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets the 5 ÷ 9 factor entirely and just works out F − 32 gets 66.6. A candidate who multiplies by 9 ÷ 5 instead of 5 ÷ 9 gets 66.6 × 9 ÷ 5 = 119.9 (1 d.p.).
8. (b) Acute — An acute angle is any angle less than 90°. Since 47° is less than 90°, it is acute. An obtuse angle is between 90° and 180°, which 47° is not. A reflex angle is greater than 180°, which is far too big for 47°. A right angle is exactly 90°, not 47°. The angle is acute.
9. (a) The median, as the one very large wage does not move it — Method: an average describes a population well when it sits close to most of the values, so compare what each average does when one value lies far from the rest. Working: in order the wages are 420, 440, 460, 480 and 1,500, so the median is the third of the five, £460. The mean uses every wage: 420 + 440 + 460 + 480 + 1,500 = 3,300 and 3,300 ÷ 5 = 660, so the mean is £660. Four of the five people earn less than £660, and the nearest of those four wages is £180 below it, so £660 describes nobody at the garage; £460 sits inside the group of four similar wages. Answer: the median, as the one very large wage does not move it, while that same wage drags the mean £200 above the median. The distractors: saying the median is always larger than the mean is an invented rule, and here the median £460 is smaller than the mean £660; saying the mean is the only average that uses all five wages is true as far as it goes, but using a value and being dragged by it are the same thing when that value is £1,500; saying £660 lies between the smallest and largest wage is true of every mean ever calculated, so it proves nothing about whether this one is typical.
10. (d) y = 3x/4 — y : x = 3 : 4 means y/x = 3/4. Rearranging to make y the subject gives y = (3/4)x = 3x/4. A student who mixes up which quantity goes on top gets y = 4x/3. A student who treats the ratio numbers as the coefficient and constant of a linear equation instead of a proportional relationship gets y = 3x + 4. A student who mistakes the relationship for inverse proportion gets y = 3/(4x).
11. (c) £32 — First find the gradient: (26 − 14) ÷ (50 − 20) = 12 ÷ 30 = £0.40 per minute. Using the point (20, 14), the charge for 65 minutes is 14 + 0.40 × (65 − 20) = 14 + 18 = £32. Choosing £26 comes from treating the charge as directly proportional to the time, multiplying the gradient by 65 minutes and ignoring the fixed part of the charge (0.40 × 65 = 26). Choosing £40 comes from treating £14 as if it were the charge at 0 minutes, then adding the gradient multiplied by the full 65 minutes (14 + 0.40 × 65 = 40), instead of multiplying by the extra time past 20 minutes. Choosing £33.80 comes from assuming the charge is directly proportional to the minutes already known, scaling up from the point (50, 26) in the ratio 65:50 (65 ÷ 50 × 26 = 33.80).
12. (a) 36 — Method: for the highest common factor, take the LOWER power of each prime that appears in both numbers. Working: for 2, the lower power is 2² (from 108); for 3, the lower power is 3² (from 72), so the highest common factor is 2² × 3² = 4 × 9 = 36. 216 comes from taking the higher power of each prime instead, 2³ × 3³ = 8 × 27 = 216, which gives the lowest common multiple, not the highest common factor. 108 is simply one of the two numbers, not their highest common factor. 6 comes from multiplying the primes without any powers at all, 2 × 3 = 6. Answer: 36.