⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) Hexagon — Cutting straight across a prism, at right angles to its length, always gives a cross-section that is the same shape as its end faces. The end faces of a hexagonal prism are hexagons (6-sided), so the cross-section is a hexagon. Choosing Pentagon comes from miscounting the sides of the hexagonal end as five instead of six. Choosing Rectangle comes from cutting along the LENGTH of the prism instead of across it, which gives a rectangular face, not the cross-section asked for. Choosing Triangle comes from confusing a hexagonal prism with a triangular prism.
2. (c) 4.1 × 10³, 3.2 × 10⁴, 2.9 × 10⁵ — The exponent decides the size first: 10³ is smaller than 10⁴, which is smaller than 10⁵, so the order is 4.1 × 10³, then 3.2 × 10⁴, then 2.9 × 10⁵. Reversing the whole list gives largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. Comparing 3.2 × 10⁴ and 4.1 × 10³ by their coefficients alone, 3.2 against 4.1, and swapping them ignores that 10⁴ is bigger than 10³ regardless of the coefficient. Comparing 2.9 × 10⁵ and 3.2 × 10⁴ by their coefficients alone and swapping them makes the same mistake at the top of the list.
3. (d) 16 — Method: use the scale to find the real length and width separately, then use the perimeter formula. Working: real length = 4 cm × 125 = 500 cm = 5 m; real width = 2.4 cm × 125 = 300 cm = 3 m; perimeter = 2 × (5 + 3) = 16 m. A student who answers 8 has added the real length and width but forgotten to double the total for the perimeter. A student who answers 1600 has correctly worked out the perimeter in centimetres but forgotten to convert it to metres. A student who answers 500 has only converted the length to real centimetres and stopped there, ignoring the width and the perimeter step. Answer: 16 m.
4. (d) 80° — The four angles of any quadrilateral add up to 360°. Three of the angles add up to 100 + 85 + 95 = 280°, so the fourth angle is 360 − 280 = 80°. "70°" comes from using 350° as the total instead of 360°, an easy slip on the quadrilateral angle sum. "280°" comes from stopping at the sum of the three given angles and writing that total down as the answer, instead of subtracting it from 360°. "260°" comes from subtracting only the one angle 100° from 360°, instead of subtracting all three given angles.
5. (a) 0.35, 3/8, 0.4 — Method: convert the fraction to a decimal so all three values can be compared directly. Working: 3/8 = 0.375, so the three values are 0.35, 0.375 and 0.4. In order from smallest to largest: 0.35, 3/8 (0.375), 0.4. Answer: 0.35, 3/8, 0.4. "3/8, 0.35, 0.4" comes from assuming a fraction must be smaller than any decimal, without converting it first. "0.4, 3/8, 0.35" comes from writing the numbers in reverse order. "0.35, 0.4, 3/8" comes from converting 3/8 by flipping it to 8/3, making it seem larger than both decimals.
6. (c) x = 4 and x = −1, because the graph crosses the x-axis where x − 4 = 0 or x + 1 = 0. — The graph crosses the x-axis where y = 0, which happens when either bracket equals zero. Solving x − 4 = 0 gives x = 4, and solving x + 1 = 0 gives x = −1. The option x = −4 and x = 1 incorrectly reverses both signs. The option x = 4 and x = 1 misreads the second bracket, ignoring that x + 1 = 0 requires x to be negative. The option x = −4 and x = −1 wrongly assumes both roots must be the negative of the constants shown, which only matches the second bracket, not the first.
7. (d) 2n + 7 > 15 — An inequality compares two expressions using a symbol other than an equals sign, such as < or >. "2n + 7" is just an expression — it has no equals or inequality sign at all, so a candidate mistaking any bare expression for an inequality would choose this. "2n + 7 = 15" is an equation: it uses an equals sign and is only true for one particular value of n, so a candidate confusing an equation with an inequality would choose this. "P = 2n + 7" is a formula, since it relates two different letters, P and n, with an equals sign, so a candidate confusing a formula with an inequality would choose this. "2n + 7 > 15" is an inequality: it compares an expression with a number using a > sign.
8. (a) 62° — Angle KPQ and angle MQP are co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines, so they add up to 180°: angle MQP = 180° − 118° = 62°. 118° comes from treating the angles as equal, as if this were a corresponding or alternate angle pair, instead of using the co-interior rule. 90° comes from wrongly assuming the crossing line meets JK and LM at right angles. 59° comes from halving 118° instead of subtracting it from 180°.
9. (a) 4 — Method: find the constant of proportionality from the pair given, write the equation, then substitute the new value of y and solve. Working: k = 21 ÷ 7 = 3, so y = 3x; putting y = 12 gives 12 = 3x, and x = 12 ÷ 3 = 4. Answer: 4. The distractors: 36 comes from multiplying by the constant instead of dividing by it, 12 × 3, which is the proportion set up upside down; 84 comes from multiplying 12 by the 7 from the first pair, using a value of x as though it were the constant; 9 comes from working out 12 − 3, treating the equation as y = x + 3 rather than y = 3x.
10. (c) −1 — Method: find each cube root separately, keeping its sign, and then add the two results. Working: (−3) × (−3) × (−3) = −27, so ∛(−27) = −3, and 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, so ∛8 = 2. Adding gives −3 + 2 = −1. Answer: −1. The distractors: 5 comes from taking the cube root of a negative number as positive, giving 3 + 2; −5 comes from reading the minus sign as applying to the whole sum and working out −(3 + 2); −6 comes from multiplying the two roots, −3 × 2, instead of adding them.
11. (b) 3/5 — The question asks about the girls only, so use the girls' total of 70 as the denominator: 42 out of 70 girls walk, giving 42/70 = 3/5. Choosing 21/65 comes from using the whole survey of 130 pupils as the denominator instead of just the 70 girls, 42/130 = 21/65. Choosing 33/70 comes from using the boys' walking count, 33, over the girls' total of 70, mixing up the two rows of the table. Choosing 2/5 comes from using the number of girls who CYCLE, 70 − 42 = 28, instead of the number who walk, giving 28/70 = 2/5.
12. (d) 4.50 m² — 1 m² = 100 cm × 100 cm = 10,000 cm², so to convert cm² to m² you divide by 10,000: 45,000 ÷ 10,000 = 4.50 m². Dividing by 100 instead of 10,000, treating area like a length conversion, gives 45,000 ÷ 100 = 450.00 m², a common mistake since 1 m = 100 cm. Multiplying by 100 instead of dividing gives 45,000 × 100 = 4500000.00 m², using the conversion factor the wrong way round entirely. Dividing by 100,000 instead of 10,000 gives 0.45 m², an extra factor of 10 too far.