⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 0.65 — Overrunning and not overrunning are exhaustive: between them they cover every outcome, so their probabilities sum to 1. Work out 1 − 0.35 = 0.65. Writing 0.35 again is the probability that the appointment overruns, not its complement — the subtraction was never done. Adding instead of subtracting gives 1 + 0.35 = 1.35, which cannot be a probability at all. Subtracting each digit from 10 instead of borrowing from the 1, so 10 − 3 = 7 tenths and 10 − 5 = 5 hundredths, gives 0.75.
2. (c) 90° — A tangent to a circle always meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so the angle between the tangent and the radius at P is 90°. 180° confuses the tangent with the diameter through P, as if the radius continued in a straight line into the tangent. 45° halves the true angle by mistake. 60° comes from confusing this fact with the angle of an equilateral triangle.
3. (a) 113.04 cm³ — Method: the volume of a sphere is (4 ÷ 3) × π × r³. Cube the radius, multiply by π, then multiply by 4 and divide by 3. Working: r³ = 3³ = 27, then 3.14 × 27 = 84.78, then 84.78 × 4 = 339.12 and 339.12 ÷ 3 = 113.04. Answer: 113.04 cm³. The distractors: 84.78 cm³ comes from stopping at πr³ and leaving out the four thirds; 37.68 cm³ comes from squaring the radius instead of cubing it, (4 ÷ 3) × 3.14 × 9; 28.26 cm³ comes from using πr², the area of a circle, and labelling it as a volume.
4. (c) 20 cm² — The area of a triangle is half of base × height. First, base × height = 8 × 5 = 40. Half of 40 is 20 cm². 40 cm² forgets to halve and just gives base × height. 13 cm² adds the base and height together instead of multiplying them. 80 cm² doubles base × height instead of halving it.
5. (d) x = 2 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 2, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 2x + 6 = 10; subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 4; dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 5 comes from dividing both sides by 2 first, reaching x + 3 = 5 and writing 5 without taking the 3 away; x = 8 comes from adding 6 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16; x = 3.5 comes from expanding 2(x + 3) as 2x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 2, which leads to 2x = 7.
6. (b) 37 — Method: on a frequency tree each pair of branches adds back up to the number it came from, so work out the failures on each branch and then add the two end branches. Working: on the men's branch 70 − 45 = 25 men failed. On the women's branch 50 − 38 = 12 women failed. Adding the two failing end branches gives 25 + 12 = 37. Answer: 37 of the 120 people failed the test. The distractors: 83 comes from adding the two passing branches, 45 + 38 = 83, and so reads the tree for the wrong outcome; 25 is the men's failing branch on its own, with the women never added; 12 is the women's failing branch on its own, with the men never added.
7. (b) 40% — 32 out of the 80 people chose Coffee, so the percentage is (32 ÷ 80) × 100 = 40%. Choosing 32% comes from treating 32 as if it were already a percentage out of 100, instead of dividing by the actual total of 80 people surveyed. Choosing 25% comes from using the Tea row instead of the Coffee row, (20 ÷ 80) × 100 = 25%. Choosing 20% comes from using the Juice row instead of the Coffee row, (16 ÷ 80) × 100 = 20%.
8. (b) 8 — Method: the gradient of a straight line is the change in the vertical value divided by the change in the horizontal value between two points on the line. Working: from the origin (0, 0) to (5, 40) the vertical change is 40 − 0 = 40 and the horizontal change is 5 − 0 = 5, so the gradient is 40 ÷ 5 = 8, which here means a cost of £8 for each litre. Answer: 8. The distractors: 0.125 comes from dividing the horizontal change by the vertical change, 5 ÷ 40, which gives litres per pound instead of the gradient; 40 comes from reading off the vertical value of the point and calling it the gradient, ignoring the 5 litres it took to reach that cost; 35 comes from subtracting the two coordinates, 40 − 5, instead of dividing them.
9. (d) 110 — Method: form the equation 15 + 0.08m = 23.80, where m is the number of minutes, then solve for m. Working: subtract the fixed fee: 0.08m = 23.80 − 15 = 8.80. Divide by the cost per minute: m = 8.80 ÷ 0.08 = 110. Answer: 110 minutes. 1.1 comes from using 8 instead of 0.08 as the cost per minute, forgetting to convert pence to pounds. 297.5 comes from dividing the whole bill by the cost per minute without subtracting the fixed fee first, 23.80 ÷ 0.08. 485 comes from adding the fixed fee to the bill instead of subtracting it, before dividing by the cost per minute, (23.80 + 15) ÷ 0.08.
10. (b) 20 — 3x² − 4x = 3(−2)² − 4(−2) = 3(4) − (−8) = 12 + 8 = 20. A candidate who makes a sign error on −4x, treating −4 × −2 as −8 instead of +8, gets 12 − 8 = 4. A candidate who squares −2 but keeps the result negative, using 3 × (−4) = −12 for the first term, but correctly works out −4x = −4 × (−2) = 8, gets −12 + 8 = −4. A candidate who squares the whole term 3x, working out (3 × −2)² − 4 × (−2), gets (−6)² + 8 = 36 + 8 = 44.
11. (a) y = x² + 2 — A quadratic equation, with x², gives a graph shaped like a symmetrical U (or an upside-down U). Of the four equations, y = x² + 2 is quadratic, so it gives this U-shape. y = x³ + 2 is cubic, giving an S-shaped curve rather than a symmetrical U. y = 2x + 2 is linear, giving a straight line. y = 2/x is reciprocal, giving two separate curved branches rather than a single U-shape.
12. (a) 4,000 nanometres — Method: the number of nanometres is the diameter divided by the length of one nanometre, and dividing powers of ten means subtracting the indices. Working: −6 − (−9) = 3, so 10⁻⁶ ÷ 10⁻⁹ = 10³, and the diameter is 4 × 10³ nanometres. Answer: 4,000 nanometres. The distractors: 400 nanometres comes from taking the difference between the indices as 2 instead of 3; 4 nanometres comes from changing the name of the unit without converting, leaving the coefficient untouched; 0.004 nanometres comes from dividing by 10³ instead of multiplying by it, as though a nanometre were the larger of the two units.