⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) 5 — A square-based pyramid has four vertices at the corners of the square base, plus one more vertex at the apex where the four triangular faces meet: 4 + 1 = 5 vertices. Choosing 8 counts the edges instead of the vertices. Choosing 4 counts only the base corners and forgets the apex at the top. Choosing 6 is the vertex count of a triangular prism, not a square-based pyramid.
2. (d) 3200 × 0.88³ — A fall of 12% leaves 88% of the value, because 100 − 12 = 88, and 88% written as a decimal multiplier is 0.88. Decay repeats that multiplier once for each year, so over 3 years it is applied three times: 0.88 × 0.88 × 0.88, which is written 0.88³. The calculation is therefore 3200 × 0.88³. Adding the percentages to make a single fall of 36% would be wrong, because each year's fall is taken from a smaller value than the year before.
3. (d) sin 30°, tan 30°, cos 30° — sin 30° = 1/2 = 0.5, tan 30° = √3/3 ≈ 0.577 and cos 30° = √3/2 ≈ 0.866, so the correct order from smallest to largest is sin 30°, tan 30°, cos 30°. 'sin 30°, cos 30°, tan 30°' swaps the last two, wrongly putting cos 30° before tan 30°. 'cos 30°, tan 30°, sin 30°' is the correct list written backwards, from largest to smallest. 'tan 30°, sin 30°, cos 30°' wrongly swaps sin 30° and tan 30° at the start.
4. (c) 12 — Method: division and multiplication have equal priority, so they are carried out in the order they are written, from left to right; a negative divided by a negative is positive. Working: (−36) ÷ (−6) = 6, and then 6 × 2 = 12. Answer: 12. The distractors: 3 comes from carrying out the multiplication first, (−6) × 2 = −12 followed by (−36) ÷ (−12) = 3; −12 comes from treating a negative divided by a negative as negative, giving −6 and then −6 × 2 = −12; 6 comes from stopping at the division and never carrying out the multiplication by 2.
5. (c) No — 7/30 is the relative frequency; theory stays 1/6. — The theoretical probability of rolling a 6 on an ordinary dice is fixed at 1/6, worked out from the number of equally likely outcomes, and does not change however the dice is actually rolled. The relative frequency from this trial is 7/30, found from what happened in these particular 30 rolls. Since 7/30 and 1/6 are different numbers, the correct statement is 'No — 7/30 is the relative frequency; theory stays 1/6.' Assuming the two values must always match because they describe the same event gives 'Yes — relative frequency always equals theory.' Believing that an observed result redefines the theoretical probability gives 'Yes — the theoretical probability has now become 7/30.' Refusing to work out either value at all gives 'Neither can be found — 30 rolls is too few to tell', which ignores that both numbers CAN be calculated from the information given.
6. (c) 26.6 — h² = 1.6² = 2.56, so B = 68 ÷ 2.56 = 26.5625, which rounds to 26.6 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets to square the height gets 68 ÷ 1.6 = 42.5. A candidate who squares the mass instead of the height gets 68² ÷ 1.6 = 2890.0. A candidate who truncates 26.5625 instead of rounding it gets 26.5.
7. (a) 250° — The back bearing (the bearing of A from B) differs from the bearing of B from A by exactly 180°. Because the given bearing, 070°, is less than 180°, add 180°: 070 + 180 = 250°, so the bearing of A from B is 250°. Choosing 180° assumes the back bearing is always exactly 180°, ignoring the original bearing altogether. Choosing 110° comes from subtracting 180° from 070° and dropping the negative sign (070 − 180 = −110) instead of adding 180°. Choosing 160° comes from adding only 90° instead of 180° (070 + 90 = 160).
8. (c) No, 90 cm is far outside the heights on the graph — Method: a line of best fit describes the trend only across the stretch of data it was drawn through; predicting beyond that stretch is extrapolation, and nothing in the data supports it. Working: the heights used to draw this line run from 150 cm to 180 cm, all of them Year 10 pupils, while 90 cm is 60 cm below the shortest of them and belongs to a two-year-old child, whose build follows no trend the graph has measured. Substituting anyway gives 0.9 × 90 − 85 = −4, a mass of −4 kg, which cannot exist. Answer: no, because 90 cm is far outside the heights on the graph. The distractors: saying a line of best fit cannot be used to predict at all throws away its main purpose, since a prediction made between the plotted values is perfectly sound; saying the line passes through all 20 points misdescribes a line of best fit, which is drawn to follow the trend of the points and will normally pass through few of them; saying the equation works for any value put into it treats an equation fitted to Year 10 heights as a law of nature, and the mass of −4 kg shows what that assumption produces.
9. (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
10. (d) 13/20 — Method: write both fractions over a common denominator, then add the numerators. Working: 2/5 = 8/20 and 1/4 = 5/20, so 2/5 + 1/4 = 8/20 + 5/20 = 13/20, which is already in its simplest form. Answer: 13/20. 1/3 comes from adding the numerators and the denominators separately: (2+1)/(5+4) = 3/9 = 1/3. 13/40 comes from converting both fractions to twentieths correctly but then adding the denominators as well as the numerators: (8+5)/(20+20) = 13/40. 3/20 comes from adding the original numerators (2+1) but keeping them over the common denominator without converting them first: 3/20.
11. (c) 9 cm — The scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is PQ ÷ AB = 12 ÷ 8 = 1.5. So PR = AC × 1.5 = 6 × 1.5 = 9 cm. (4 cm comes from using the scale factor upside down, AB ÷ PQ; 10 cm comes from adding the difference between AB and PQ, 4 cm, to AC instead of scaling; 16 cm comes from multiplying PQ by the ratio AB : AC instead of scaling AC by the correct scale factor.)
12. (c) Map A, where the distance is 40 cm — 10 km = 1,000,000 cm. On Map A: 1000000 ÷ 25000 = 40 cm. On Map B: 1000000 ÷ 50000 = 20 cm. Since 40 cm is longer than 20 cm, the same real distance appears longer on Map A, the map with the smaller scale number. 'Map B, where the distance is 20 cm' has the correct working for Map B but names the wrong map as the one with the longer length. 'Map A, where the distance is 20 cm' correctly identifies Map A but pairs it with Map B's length. 'Map B, where the distance is 40 cm' correctly identifies Map A's length but attaches it to the wrong map.