⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) (2, 6) — Adding the vector to the point gives the new position: (5 + (−3), 2 + 4) = (2, 6). '(8, 6)' comes from adding 3 instead of subtracting it, treating the top number as positive. '(9, −1)' comes from swapping the two components of the vector before adding them. '(2, 2)' applies the horizontal movement correctly but forgets to add the vertical movement.
2. (d) An inequality, because ≤ compares the two sides — The symbol ≤ means 'is less than or equal to', so the statement compares the sizes of the two sides instead of saying they are equal: that makes it an inequality. Solving it gives n ≤ 5, a whole range of values rather than the single value an equation would give. An identity has to be true for every value of the letter, and this fails at n = 6, so it is not one. A formula works one quantity out from another, and there is only one letter here.
3. (a) 8,350 — Rounding to the nearest 100 means the true number can be up to half of 100, which is 50, below the recorded figure before it would round down to a lower hundred. The smallest possible number is therefore 8,400 − 50 = 8,350. Adding 50 instead of subtracting it gives 8,450, which is the upper end of the interval rather than the smallest value, and 8,450 is not itself possible because it would round up to 8,500. Subtracting a whole 100 instead of half of it gives 8,300, going too far below the recorded value. Subtracting 10 instead of half of the rounding unit gives 8,390, treating the rounding unit as 100 but the tolerance as only 10.
4. (a) 1276 — Method: an unbiased relative frequency tends towards the theoretical probability as the number of trials increases, so use the record resting on the most trials, then multiply by the number of new trials. Working: the three records rest on 50, 200 and 1000 drops, so the most reliable is the one after 1000 drops, namely 0.638, and the run is indeed settling as the trials increase. The expected number of point up landings in 2000 further drops is 2000 × 0.638 = 1276. Answer: about 1276 times. The distractors: 1440 uses the earliest record, which rests on only 50 drops, giving 2000 × 0.720 = 1440; 1330 uses the middle record, treating 200 drops as a safe compromise when 1000 drops is better still, giving 2000 × 0.665 = 1330; 1348 comes from averaging the three records, since 0.720 + 0.665 + 0.638 = 2.023 and 2.023 ÷ 3 = 0.674, then 2000 × 0.674 = 1348, which gives the 50 drop record the same weight as the 1000 drop record.
5. (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
6. (b) 1 : 500 — smallest real distance per cm (5 m), most detail — Method: compare what one centimetre represents in real life for each scale — the scale with the smallest real distance per cm shows the most detail. Working: for 1 : 500, 1 cm represents 500 cm (5 m); for 1 : 5000, 1 cm represents 50 m; for 1 : 50 000, 1 cm represents 500 m. Since 5 m is the smallest, 1 : 500 shows the most detail. Wrong options: '1 : 50 000 — covers the largest real area' wrongly assumes covering more area means more detail, when it is the opposite; '1 : 5000 — the middle value' wrongly assumes the middle scale is automatically the most balanced; '1 : 500 — covers the largest real distance' picks the correct scale but states an incorrect fact, since 1 : 500 actually covers the smallest real distance per cm.
7. (b) 158 minutes — Rearranging C = 15 + 0.2m for m: subtract 15 from both sides to get C − 15 = 0.2m, then divide by 0.2: m = (C − 15)/0.2. Substituting C = 46.60: m = (46.60 − 15)/0.2 = 31.60/0.2 = 158. Answering 233 minutes comes from dividing the whole £46.60 by 0.2 without first taking off the £15 fixed charge. Answering 308 minutes comes from adding the £15 instead of subtracting it: (46.60 + 15)/0.2. Answering 218 minutes divides first and subtracts 15 afterwards, in the wrong order: 46.60/0.2 − 15 = 233 − 15 = 218. Ali made 158 minutes of calls.
8. (d) £800 — Rounding 38.7 to 1 significant figure gives 40, and rounding 21.40 to 1 significant figure gives 20. Multiplying the rounded values gives an estimate of 40 × 20 = £800. Rounding 21.40 to the nearest whole number instead of to 1 significant figure gives 21, and 40 × 21 = £840, one place value too fine for the price. Adding the rounded values instead of multiplying them gives 40 + 20 = £60. Rounding both numbers to 2 significant figures instead of 1, giving 39 and 21, produces 39 × 21 = £819.
9. (d) Correlation is a link; causation is one causing the other — Method: the two words describe different claims — one is about a pattern in the data, the other is about what produced that pattern. Working: correlation says only that two quantities tend to change together, which is something a scatter graph can display; causation says that a change in one quantity actually brings about the change in the other, which needs evidence a scatter graph cannot supply, because a third quantity may be driving both. Answer: correlation is a link between the quantities, while causation is one quantity causing the change in another. The distractors: the statement giving causation as the link and correlation as the cause simply swaps the two words over; the statement that the words mean the same thing is the classic error of reading a correlation as proof of cause; the statement that a scatter graph shows causation but not correlation reverses what a scatter graph can do, since the pattern it displays is exactly the correlation.
10. (b) (22, −13) — The vector from the ship to the lighthouse is (12, −4) − (2, 5) = (10, −9). Sailing along this vector twice from the start gives (2, 5) + 2 × (10, −9) = (2 + 20, 5 − 18) = (22, −13). '(12, −4)' stops after the ship reaches the lighthouse and ignores the second identical leg. '(−18, 23)' comes from finding the vector the wrong way round, as (2, 5) − (12, −4) = (−10, 9), and then doubling that. '(2, 5)' comes from adding the vector and then subtracting it again, wrongly cancelling the two legs instead of adding them.
11. (a) a rounded rectangle: 5 m by 4 m with semicircular ends — Points within 2 m of the straight part of the fence form a rectangle running the 5 m length of the fence and 4 m wide (2 m on each side); points within 2 m of each END of the fence, beyond that rectangle, form a semicircle of radius 2 m there, since the nearest point of the fence to them is just that one end. Together this gives a rounded, stadium-shaped region. "a rectangle, 9 m by 4 m" extends the rectangle by 2 m at each end instead of rounding it, wrongly including corner points that are actually more than 2 m from every part of the fence. "a circle of radius 2 m" treats the whole 5 m fence as a single point. "a rectangle, 5 m by 2 m" uses 2 m as the full width instead of the distance on EACH side, so it only covers one side of the fence.
12. (a) The tape can only give the length to the nearest centimetre — Method: a measurement should never be written to a finer degree of accuracy than the instrument used can read. Working: the tape is marked in centimetres, so the smallest division Leah can read is 1 cm, which is 0.01 m and two decimal places in metres; writing 7.3157 m claims the length to the nearest tenth of a millimetre, four decimal places, which the markings cannot support. A record of 7.32 m, to the nearest centimetre, is what this tape justifies. Answer: The tape can only give the length to the nearest centimetre. The distractors: the nearest millimetre contradicts the markings described in the question, which are centimetres, and would still claim more accuracy than the tape offers; the rule that a length in metres must be written to 2 decimal places borrows the habit of writing money to the penny, when the accuracy of a length depends on the instrument; rounding to the nearest metre would throw away accuracy the tape genuinely provides.