⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 2 — Method: the cube root of a number is the value that multiplies by itself three times to give that number. Working: 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, so ∛8 = 2. 4 comes from working out 8 ÷ 2 = 4, halving the number instead of finding its cube root. 24 comes from working out 8 × 3 = 24, multiplying by 3 instead of cube-rooting it. 64 is 8², the square of 8, not its cube root. Answer: 2.
2. (b) 4/5 — Write the mass of the beans over the mass of the soup: 400/500. Divide the top and bottom by 100 to get 4/5. Choosing 5/4 comes from writing the soup's mass over the beans' mass, the wrong way round. Choosing 1/5 comes from finding the difference in mass (500 − 400 = 100) and writing that over the mass of the soup, instead of using the mass of the beans. Choosing 5/9 comes from writing the mass of the soup over the total mass of both tins (500 out of 900), instead of over the mass of the beans.
3. (c) An under-estimate, by 8 — Method: work out the exact product, then compare it with the estimate; an estimate that is smaller than the exact value is an under-estimate, and the difference between them is the size of the error. Working: 48 × 21 = 48 × 20 + 48 = 960 + 48 = 1,008, and 1,008 − 1,000 = 8, so the estimate falls short. Answer: an under-estimate, by 8. The distractors: an over-estimate by 8 has the size of the error right but the direction wrong, and comes from assuming that rounding 48 up to 50 must push the estimate above the exact value, without allowing for 21 being rounded down; an over-estimate by 19 comes from working out 48 × 21 as 48 × 20 + 21 = 981, adding a 21 where another 48 belongs; the claim that the estimate is exactly right comes from arguing that one number was rounded up and the other down, so the two changes must cancel.
4. (c) 8x − 12 — Multiply each term inside the bracket by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12. A candidate who forgets to multiply the second term by 4 gets 8x − 3. A candidate who makes a sign error, treating 4 × (−3) as +12, gets 8x + 12. A candidate who adds 4 to the bracket instead of multiplying gets 2x + 1.
5. (a) 4/5 — Method: find the June takings first, then write them over the May takings and cancel. Working: the takings fell by £900, so June is £4500 − £900 = £3600; the fraction is 3600/4500, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 900 gives 4/5. Answer: 4/5 of the May takings. The distractors: 1/5 comes from writing the fall over the May takings, 900/4500, which answers how far the takings dropped rather than what June's takings are compared with May's; 5/4 comes from writing May over June, 4500/3600, reversing the order the question asks for; 4/9 comes from writing June over the two months added together, 3600/8100, a part-to-whole fraction when the comparison asked for is with May alone.
6. (d) 19 kg — Method: estimate the mean of grouped data by multiplying each class's midpoint by its frequency, adding the four totals, then dividing by the total frequency. Working: the midpoints are 5, 15, 25 and 35 kg. The weighted totals are 11 × 5 = 55, 5 × 15 = 75, 5 × 25 = 125 and 9 × 35 = 315, which add to 570. Dividing by the 30 dogs gives an estimate of 570 ÷ 30 = 19 kg. Giving 5 kg reads off the midpoint of the modal class, 0 < m ≤ 10, the class with the most dogs — but the class with the most dogs is not where the mean falls, and neither is a substitute for actually calculating it. Giving 20 kg averages the four midpoints, (5 + 15 + 25 + 35) ÷ 4, treating every class as equally likely and ignoring that far more dogs are in the lightest and heaviest classes than in the middle two. Giving 570 kg stops after finding the correct weighted total and forgets the final division by the 30 dogs. Always weight each midpoint by its own frequency, and always finish by dividing by the total frequency, not the number of classes.
7. (a) The hourly rate is £5 and the fixed fee is £7 — The gradient is (27 − 12) ÷ (4 − 1) = 15 ÷ 3 = £5, the hourly rate. Using the point (1, 12): 12 = 5 × 1 + fee, so the fee is 12 − 5 = £7. That gives 'The hourly rate is £5 and the fixed fee is £7'. Swapping the two figures gives the statement with £7 as the rate and £5 as the fee, which has them the wrong way round. Taking the C-value of the first point, £12, as the fixed fee ignores that 1 hour of hire is already included in that £12. Using 15, the change in C, as the hourly rate without dividing by the change in h (3 hours) gives the statement claiming a £15 hourly rate.
8. (a) 13/40 — Method: write the decimal over 1000 using its three decimal places, then simplify. Working: 0.325 = 325/1000 = 13/40 (dividing both numerator and denominator by 25). Answer: 13/40. 13/4 comes from writing the decimal over 100 instead of 1000, as if there were only two decimal places. 8/25 comes from rounding 0.325 down to 0.32 before converting. 3/8 comes from recalling the learned conversion 3/8 = 0.375 and matching it to 0.325 because both are three-place decimals beginning with 3, instead of converting the decimal given.
9. (d) 36 cm³ — V = lwh = 2 × 3 × 6 = 36 cm³. A candidate who adds all three numbers instead of multiplying gets 2 + 3 + 6 = 11 cm³. A candidate who multiplies only two of the three numbers, forgetting the length, gets w × h = 3 × 6 = 18 cm³. A candidate who multiplies l × w and w × h separately and adds the two products gets (2 × 3) + (3 × 6) = 6 + 18 = 24 cm³.
10. (d) 4 — Method: list the elements of each set in full, then find which elements appear in both lists — that is A ∩ B. Working: factors of 12 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12}. Factors of 18 = {1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18}. The elements in both lists are 1, 2, 3 and 6, so A ∩ B = {1, 2, 3, 6} and n(A ∩ B) = 4. Answer: 4. Watch out: writing down 6 gives n(A), the size of the factors-of-12 list on its own, not the size of the overlap. Writing down 8 comes from counting every element that appears in EITHER list, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 18 — that is the union, a different set from the intersection. And writing down 3 misses that 1 is a factor of both 12 and 18, and so belongs in A ∩ B alongside 2, 3 and 6.
11. (c) 448.00 US dollars — Method: multiply the amount in pounds by the exchange rate. Working: £350 × 1.28 = 448.00 US dollars. Wrong options: 273.44 US dollars comes from dividing by the rate instead of multiplying (350 ÷ 1.28); 351.28 US dollars comes from adding the rate to the amount instead of multiplying; 4,480.00 US dollars comes from a decimal-point slip, using 12.8 instead of 1.28.
12. (b) 20 — 3x² − 4x = 3(−2)² − 4(−2) = 3(4) − (−8) = 12 + 8 = 20. A candidate who makes a sign error on −4x, treating −4 × −2 as −8 instead of +8, gets 12 − 8 = 4. A candidate who squares −2 but keeps the result negative, using 3 × (−4) = −12 for the first term, but correctly works out −4x = −4 × (−2) = 8, gets −12 + 8 = −4. A candidate who squares the whole term 3x, working out (3 × −2)² − 4 × (−2), gets (−6)² + 8 = 36 + 8 = 44.