⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 1 — Method: BIDMAS deals with the index before the subtraction, and a negative number multiplied by itself gives a positive result. Working: (−2)² = (−2) × (−2) = 4, so the calculation becomes 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: 1. The distractors: −7 comes from squaring only the 2 and leaving the minus sign outside the index, giving −(2²) − 3 = −4 − 3 = −7; −1 comes from subtracting the square from 3 instead of 3 from the square, giving 3 − 4 = −1; 25 comes from carrying out the subtraction before the index, giving (−2 − 3)² = (−5)² = 25.
2. (c) Ben: 2 × 3 = 6, then 6 + 6 = 12 — Multiplication has priority over addition, so 2 × 3 = 6 is worked out first, then 6 + 6 = 12 — this is Ben's method. Amy adds 6 and 2 before multiplying: 6 + 2 = 8, then 8 × 3 = 24, breaking the priority rule. Chen multiplies the wrong pair of numbers, 6 and 2, instead of 2 and 3: 6 × 2 = 12, then 12 + 3 = 15. Dev applies the right order but slips when multiplying, using 5 instead of 6 for 2 × 3, so the final step becomes 6 + 5 = 11.
3. (d) It asks two things at once and invites agreement — Method: a survey question is faulty when a reply to it cannot be read as evidence about one single thing, so check how many claims it contains and whether its wording pushes the reader one way. Working: the question joins two separate claims, that learning matters and that more homework should be set, so a reply of yes could mean either of them or both and cannot be counted as evidence about homework; the opening words “Do you agree” also invite agreement instead of leaving the reader free to say no. Answer: it asks two things at once and invites agreement. The distractors: the reply calling it too short mistakes length for clarity, when the fault is that too much has been packed in rather than too little; the reply about long words is false, since every word in the question is an everyday one and the fault lies in what is being asked rather than in the vocabulary used to ask it; the reply that the question is fine takes a yes or no answer as proof that the question works, which is exactly what a double question defeats.
4. (d) 450 g — Find the amount of rice per person: 300 ÷ 4 = 75 g. Multiply by the new number of people: 75 × 6 = 450 g. Giving 200 g swaps which number the rice is divided and multiplied by (300 ÷ 6 × 4 = 200), scaling the wrong way. Giving 180 g uses 4 + 6 = 10 as the base instead of the original 4 people (300 × 6 ÷ 10 = 180). Giving 400 g assumes each of the 2 extra people needs 300 ÷ 6 = 50 g on top of the original 300 g (300 + 2 × 50 = 400), rather than scaling the whole amount in proportion.
5. (d) 15 cm — Method: any two sides of a triangle must together be longer than the third, so the third side must be longer than the difference of the two given sides and shorter than their sum. Working: the difference is 20 − 8 = 12 cm and the sum is 20 + 8 = 28 cm, so the third side must be between 12 cm and 28 cm, and 15 cm lies inside that range. Answer: 15 cm. The distractors: 12 cm is exactly the difference, so the three lengths would lie flat along a straight line and never close into a triangle; 5 cm is shorter than the difference — 5 + 8 = 13 cm cannot reach across the 20 cm side — and is chosen by candidates who check no lower limit at all; 30 cm is longer than the sum of the other two, so those two sides could never meet, and it is chosen by candidates who check no upper limit.
6. (b) 6 m — Volume of a cuboid = length × width × height, so height = volume ÷ (length × width) = 360 ÷ (12 × 5) = 360 ÷ 60 = 6 m. A pupil who divides the volume by the length only gets 360 ÷ 12 = 30 m. A pupil who divides the volume by the width only gets 360 ÷ 5 = 72 m. A pupil who subtracts length × width from the volume instead of dividing gets 360 − 60 = 300 m. The correct height is 6 m.
7. (d) 21 — The differences between consecutive triangular numbers increase by 1 each time: 3−1=2, 6−3=3, 10−6=4, 15−10=5. So the next difference is 6, giving 15+6=21. A candidate who keeps the difference the same as the previous step (adding 5 again) would reach 20. A candidate who uses a constant difference of 3 throughout would reach 18. A candidate who instead finds the square of the term number (5²=25, since 15 is the 5th term) would reach 25 — that is the rule for square numbers, not triangular numbers.
8. (a) 32 m — The scale factor from the larger pond to the smaller pond is 4 ÷ 11, so the smaller perimeter is 88 × 4 ÷ 11 = 32 m. The distractor 242 m comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 88 × 11 ÷ 4 = 242. The distractor 84 m comes from subtracting the smaller ratio number, 88 − 4 = 84, instead of scaling. The distractor 121 m comes from multiplying 11 × 11 = 121, ignoring the given perimeter altogether.
9. (d) 7.21 units — Method: the diagonal AC is the hypotenuse of the right-angled triangle ABC, whose shorter sides are AB and BC, so Pythagoras' theorem gives its length. Working: AB runs from (0, 0) to (6, 0), so AB = 6; BC runs from (6, 0) to (6, 4), so BC = 4. Then AC² = 6² + 4² = 36 + 16 = 52, so AC = √52 = 7.2111…, which is 7.21 correct to 2 decimal places. Answer: 7.21 units. The distractors: 10.00 units comes from adding the two sides, 6 + 4, instead of adding their squares and taking the root; 4.47 units comes from subtracting the squares, √(36 − 16), which is the form of Pythagoras used to find a shorter side rather than the hypotenuse; 26.00 units comes from halving 52 in place of taking its square root.
10. (d) 10π cm — Method: for a circle, circumference = π × diameter. Working: circumference = π × 10 = 10π cm. Answer: 10π cm. 20π cm comes from using the formula 2 × π × radius but plugging in the diameter as if it were the radius: 2 × π × 10 = 20π. 25π cm comes from confusing circumference with area, using π × radius² with radius 5: π × 5² = 25π. 5π cm comes from halving the diameter and then multiplying by π, as if circumference were π × radius: π × 5 = 5π.
11. (c) Strong negative correlation — Method: correlation is described by two things — the direction the points take as the graph is read from left to right, and how closely the points lie to a single straight line. Working: reading the pairs in order of age, the ages rise 14, 18, 23, 27, 31, 36, 42, 49 while the scores fall 92, 88, 85, 80, 78, 74, 70, 65; the score falls at every single step, with no reversal anywhere, so the points fall from left to right and lie close to a straight line. Answer: strong negative correlation — negative for the falling direction, strong because every point follows the pattern. The distractors: strong positive correlation comes from noticing a clear pattern and calling any clear pattern positive, without checking the direction; weak negative correlation comes from reading the direction correctly but judging points that do not lie exactly on a straight line to be only loosely related, when these eight fall without a single exception; no correlation comes from reading a falling trend as though it showed no relationship at all, when a falling trend is itself a relationship.
12. (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.