⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
2. (d) Testing destroys bulbs, so testing all leaves none to sell. — Method: testing every item in a population instead of a sample is a census — sensible only when testing does not use up or destroy what is being tested. Working: here, testing a bulb to find its lifespan destroys it, so testing all 50,000 bulbs would leave nothing left to sell — a sample lets the company estimate the typical lifespan without destroying its whole stock. Extra electricity used in testing is not the real reason a census is avoided here — it is the destruction of the product that matters. Saying a sample is always more accurate than a full census is the wrong way round: a census, if it could be carried out, gives the exact figure for the whole population — it is testing being destructive, not a lack of accuracy, that rules it out here. There is no law against testing every item a company makes — nothing in the question suggests that. When testing destroys the item being tested, sampling is necessary, not just convenient.
3. (a) 195 — The relative frequency from the trial is 52 ÷ 80 = 0.65, and the expected number of point-up landings in 300 drops is 0.65 × 300 = 195. Giving 52 as the answer reuses the original count from the 80-drop trial without scaling it up to 300 drops at all. Misreading 52 out of 80 as 52% and finding 52% of 300 gives 156. Finding the expected number of point-DOWN landings instead of point-up, using the relative frequency 28 ÷ 80 = 0.35, gives 0.35 × 300 = 105.
4. (c) 26.6 — h² = 1.6² = 2.56, so B = 68 ÷ 2.56 = 26.5625, which rounds to 26.6 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets to square the height gets 68 ÷ 1.6 = 42.5. A candidate who squares the mass instead of the height gets 68² ÷ 1.6 = 2890.0. A candidate who truncates 26.5625 instead of rounding it gets 26.5.
5. (c) 27.1 cm — The model length is 20.6 ÷ 76 = 0.271052... metres. Converting to centimetres by multiplying by 100 gives 27.1052..., which rounds to 27.1 cm. Forgetting to convert metres to centimetres leaves the answer as 0.271052... metres, which rounds to 0.3 cm if the unit is simply relabelled. Multiplying by 1000 instead of 100 when converting metres to centimetres gives 271.052..., which rounds to 271.1 cm. Multiplying by 76 instead of dividing, 20.6 × 76 = 1565.6, uses the scale factor the wrong way round — that would be the real length if the model were 20.6 units long, not the other way round.
6. (a) 2/5 — The ratio 2:3 has 2 + 3 = 5 parts in total, and the larger plot is 3 of those parts. Since the larger plot is 18 m², each part is 18 ÷ 3 = 6 m², so the total area is 5 × 6 = 30 m² and the smaller plot is 2 × 6 = 12 m². The fraction of the total area taken up by the smaller plot is 12/30, which simplifies to 2/5. Giving the fraction for the larger plot instead of the smaller one gives 3/5. Comparing the smaller plot to the larger plot instead of to the total area gives 2/3. Assuming the two plots split the area evenly, ignoring the given ratio altogether, gives 1/2.
7. (c) 5 — Method: work out the volume of one box, divide the total volume by it, then round down since a partial box cannot fit. Working: volume of one box = 7³ = 343 cm³. 2000 ÷ 343 = 5.83 (2 d.p.). Since only whole boxes fit, the greatest number is 5. Answer: 5. (6 comes from rounding 5.83 up to the nearest whole number instead of rounding down to the number of boxes that actually fit. 343 comes from giving the volume of one box instead of the number of boxes. 5.8 comes from leaving the division as a decimal instead of rounding down to a whole number of boxes.)
8. (d) −2 — Method: a gradient can only be read off an equation that is written in the form y = mx + c, so y has to be made the subject first. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 2x + y = 8 gives y = −2x + 8, and comparing that with y = mx + c gives m = −2. Answer: −2. The distractors: 2 comes from reading the coefficient of x straight off the equation as it is printed, without rearranging, so the change of sign is missed; 8 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −1/2 comes from rearranging correctly and then writing the gradient upside down, as the change in x over the change in y.
9. (c) S = P + C — Method: S has C subtracted from it, so undo that subtraction by adding C to both sides. Working: P + C = S − C + C, so P + C = S, which is written S = P + C. Answer: S = P + C. S = P − C repeats the formula's own operation instead of its inverse. S = C − P subtracts the wrong way round. S = PC multiplies the two given quantities instead of adding them.
10. (d) £2.00 — Cost for Printer A = 200 × £0.04 = £8. Cost for Printer B = 200 × £0.05 = £10. Difference = £10 − £8 = £2.00.
11. (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
12. (a) (5, 4) — Method: find the vector from the centre to the point, multiply it by the scale factor, then add the result back to the centre. Working: the vector from (2, 4) to (8, 4) is (6, 0); multiplying by 1/2 gives (3, 0); adding this to the centre (2, 4) gives (5, 4). Options: (4, 2) comes from multiplying the original coordinates by 1/2 directly, ignoring the centre of enlargement; (14, 4) comes from using a scale factor of 2 instead of 1/2, giving (2, 4) + 2×(6, 0) = (14, 4); (8, 2) comes from halving only the y-coordinate and leaving the x-coordinate unchanged. Answer: (5, 4).