⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) y = −x + 30 — Method: in a linear model the value at the start is the constant term and the steady rate of change is the gradient, which is negative when the quantity is falling. Working: at x = 0 the candle is 30 cm tall, so the constant term is 30; it loses 1 cm every hour, so the gradient is −1 and the height after x hours is y = −x + 30. Answer: y = −x + 30. The distractors: y = x + 30 comes from taking the rate as +1 and making the candle grow rather than shrink; y = 30x − 1 comes from building the model correctly as 30 − 1x and then copying it into the form y = mx + c with the two numbers left where they stood, so the starting height 30 ends up multiplying x and the hourly 1 is left behind as the constant being taken away; y = −30x + 1 comes from reading the two numbers the other way round, taking 30 cm per hour as the rate and 1 cm as the starting height, which burns 30 cm an hour from a candle only 1 cm tall.
2. (d) 10 — Method: the distance between two points is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose shorter sides are the horizontal and vertical gaps, so work out both gaps first, handling the negative coordinates carefully, and then apply Pythagoras' theorem. Working: the horizontal gap is 5 − (−3) = 5 + 3 = 8 and the vertical gap is 4 − (−2) = 4 + 2 = 6. Then d² = 8² + 6² = 64 + 36 = 100, so d = √100 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 14 comes from adding the two gaps, 8 + 6, instead of adding their squares and taking the root; 100 comes from stopping at the sum of the squares and never taking the square root; 50 comes from reaching 100 correctly and then halving it instead of taking its square root, a candidate who has read the last step as “halve” rather than “root”.
3. (b) p = 3n — n = p/3 means p has been divided by 3, so to make p the subject, multiply both sides by 3: p = 3n. Writing p = n/3 leaves the formula exactly as it was, without undoing the division. Writing p = n − 3 mistakes division for subtraction and takes 3 away from n instead of multiplying. Writing p = 3/n incorrectly flips the fraction upside down rather than multiplying n by 3. The correct rearrangement is p = 3n.
4. (c) The data show a link only; a third factor may affect both — Method: a study of this kind measures two quantities and reports how they change together; deciding that one of them produces the other is a further claim, and it needs evidence that the measurements alone cannot give. Working: the study shows that more coffee goes with better concentration, which is a positive correlation; but a third factor that was never measured, such as how motivated someone is, could raise both the coffee drinking and the concentration, and the concentration could equally be what leads to the extra coffee. Answer: the data show a link only, because a third factor may be affecting both quantities, so no claim about cause can be made. The distractors: calling the conclusion safe because the correlation is positive treats the direction of a correlation as proof of cause, which no direction can give; calling it wrong because the correlation is negative misreads the direction of the relationship, since the study reports both quantities rising together; saying the two quantities are not linked denies the correlation the study actually found, when what fails is only the claim about cause.
5. (a) Triangular prism — Count the given properties against each solid. A triangular prism has 5 faces (2 triangular ends + 3 rectangular sides), 9 edges and 6 vertices — this matches exactly, so the solid is a triangular prism. A square-based pyramid also has 5 faces, but 8 edges and 5 vertices, and only one face is a square rather than three rectangles — the edge and vertex counts don't match. A cuboid has 6 faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices, none of which match the numbers given. A tetrahedron has 4 faces, all triangles, with 6 edges and 4 vertices — too few faces, and no rectangular faces at all.
6. (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
7. (d) 1,000 — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, then multiply the rounded values. Working: 49 rounds to 50 and 21 rounds to 20, and 50 × 20 = 1,000 because 5 × 2 = 10 and the two rounded numbers carry one zero each. Answer: 1,000. The distractors: 800 comes from rounding 49 down to 40 instead of to the nearest ten; 1,500 comes from rounding 21 up to 30 rather than down to 20; 1,029 is the exact product 49 × 21, worked out in full when the question asks for an estimate.
8. (a) 2² × 3 — Method: divide repeatedly by the smallest prime that goes in, until 1 is reached, then write the primes used as a product with indices. Working: 12 ÷ 2 = 6, 6 ÷ 2 = 3 and 3 ÷ 3 = 1, so the primes used are 2, 2 and 3, which is written as 2² × 3. Answer: 2² × 3. The distractors: 2 × 6 comes from stopping at the first factor pair without splitting the 6, which is not prime; 2 × 3 comes from listing each prime once and losing the repeat, and it multiplies to 6 rather than 12; 2 × 3² puts the index on the wrong prime and multiplies to 18.
9. (d) Yes, since 3² + 4² = 5² — AB is horizontal with length 5 − 1 = 4, BC is vertical with length 4 − 1 = 3, and CA = √(4² + 3²) = √25 = 5. Since the two shorter sides satisfy 3² + 4² = 5², the triangle is right-angled, with the right angle at B. "No, since 3 + 4 ≠ 5" wrongly tests Pythagoras' theorem by adding the sides instead of squaring them first. "No, since AB, BC and CA are not all equal" confuses a right-angled triangle with an equilateral one — a triangle does not need equal sides to have a right angle. "Yes, since 4² + 5² = 3²" reaches the correct conclusion but puts the longest side, 5, on the wrong side of the equation, as if it were one of the two shorter sides instead of the hypotenuse.
10. (d) V = lwh — V = lwh is a formula: it relates one quantity, the volume V, to others, the length, width and height, in a way that is true generally. A candidate who picks lwh has chosen the expression, not a full statement relating two quantities. A candidate who picks lwh = 60 has chosen an equation, since it is only true for particular values of l, w and h that multiply to 60. A candidate who picks 2(l + w) ≡ 2l + 2w has chosen an identity, mistaking the identity symbol ≡ for a sign that makes a statement a formula.
11. (c) 100√3 cm — The height is opposite the 60° angle, so height = 2 × sin 60° = 2 × √3/2 = √3 m. Converting to centimetres: √3 m = 100√3 cm. '√3 cm' forgets to convert the answer from metres to centimetres. '200√3 cm' comes from mis-recalling sin 60° as √3 instead of √3/2, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 2 × √3 = 2√3 m = 200√3 cm. '50√3 cm' comes from halving the ladder's length before multiplying by sin 60°, instead of using the full 2 m.
12. (d) 60° — Method: the 4 cm side is next to the angle wanted and the 8 cm side is the hypotenuse, so the ratio built from them is cos θ = adjacent ÷ hypotenuse, and the angle comes from the inverse cosine. Working: cos θ = 4 ÷ 8 = 0.5, so θ = cos⁻¹(0.5). Answer: 60°. The distractors: 30° comes from using sin⁻¹(0.5), which treats the 4 cm side as the side opposite the angle when it is the side next to it; 45° comes from assuming the two acute angles of the triangle must be equal; 90° comes from writing down the right angle the question already gives instead of the angle it asks for.