⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) £1,000, so £900 is not enough — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, multiply to estimate the total cost, then compare the estimate with the money available. Working: 187 rounds to 200 and £4.85 rounds to £5, so the estimate is 200 × 5 = 1,000, and £1,000 is more than the £900 the school has. Answer: £1,000, so £900 is not enough. The distractors: £800 comes from cutting £4.85 down to £4 instead of rounding it up to £5, giving 200 × 4 = 800, and that estimate wrongly suggests the money stretches; £935 comes from rounding the price only and keeping 187 lunches, giving 187 × 5 = 935; £950 comes from rounding 187 to the nearest 10 rather than to 1 significant figure, giving 190 × 5 = 950.
2. (d) It is n-shaped, since the x² coefficient is negative. — The coefficient of x² is −2, which is negative, so the quadratic curve opens downward — shaped like an n, with a maximum turning point. Saying it is U-shaped focuses only on x² being non-negative and ignores that the −2 in front of it flips the whole curve to open downward. Saying it is a straight line confuses having a constant term with being linear — any equation with an x² term is a curve, not a line. Saying it repeatedly rises and falls like a wave describes a trigonometric graph such as y = sin x, not a quadratic.
3. (c) 9/16 — There are 180 students in total and 84 are in Year 11, so Year 10 has 180 − 84 = 96 students. Of those 96, 42 travel by bus, so 96 − 42 = 54 walk. P(Year 10 student walks) = 54/96 = 9/16. Using the whole school of 180 as the denominator instead of just the 96 Year 10 students gives 54/180 = 3/10. Using the bus count, 42, as if it were the number who walk gives 42/96 = 7/16, the wrong branch of the Year 10 row. Working out the probability for Year 11 instead of Year 10 — 46 walkers out of 84 — gives 46/84 = 23/42.
4. (a) 30° — Method: the exterior angles of any convex polygon add up to 360°, and in a regular polygon they are all equal, so divide 360° by the number of sides. Working: 360 ÷ 12 = 30. Answer: 30°. The distractors: 150° is the interior angle, 180 − 30, which answers for the wrong angle at the vertex; 15° comes from dividing 180 by 12, using the angles on a straight line instead of the full turn; 36° comes from dividing 360 by 12 − 2 = 10, carrying the subtraction of 2 out of the interior angle sum formula into a calculation that does not need it.
5. (b) It is not even an ordinary equation with a solution: expanding the left-hand side gives 3x − 12, and 3x − 12 = 3x − 4 would require −12 = −4, which is never true. — Expanding the left-hand side, 3(x − 4) = 3x − 12. Setting this equal to the right-hand side, 3x − 12 = 3x − 4, gives −12 = −4 once the 3x terms are removed from both sides — a statement that is never true, so no value of x satisfies the equation at all, and it is certainly not an identity. The option about substituting a specific value misunderstands algebraic expansion, which holds for every x, not one chosen value. The option matching the first term wrongly assumes that is enough to prove equivalence. The option about multiplying the 4 by 3 on both sides is nonsensical, since there is only one bracket to expand, on the left-hand side.
6. (b) 3 — −6 + 9 = 3. A candidate who ignores the negative sign on the x-coordinate and adds the two positive values gets 6 + 9 = 15. A candidate who treats the y-coordinate as negative too gets −6 + (−9) = −15. A candidate who works out 9 − 6 correctly as 3 but then writes the answer with the wrong sign gets −3.
7. (c) 150% — Percentage = (180,000 ÷ 120,000) × 100 = 150%.
8. (c) y = 3x + 2 — Method: divide the change in the outputs by the change in the inputs to find the multiplier, then put one pair of values into the rule to find the number added on. Working: the output rises by 11 − 5 = 6 while the input rises by 3 − 1 = 2, so the multiplier is 6 ÷ 2 = 3; with an input of 1, 3 × 1 = 3 and the output is 5, so 2 is added. Answer: y = 3x + 2, checked against the second pair by 3 × 3 + 2 = 11. The distractors: y = 3x − 2 comes from finding the multiplier 3 and then subtracting the 2 instead of adding it; y = 2x + 3 comes from swapping the multiplier and the number added on; y = x + 4 comes from assuming the input is multiplied by 1 and using 5 − 1 = 4 as the number added on.
9. (c) A↔N, B↔L, C↔M (ABC≅NLM) — Matching equal side lengths: AB (8 cm) equals NL (8 cm), BC (10 cm) equals LM (10 cm), and CA (6 cm) equals MN (6 cm). This gives the correspondence A with N, B with L, and C with M, so triangle ABC is congruent to triangle NLM, making 'A↔N, B↔L, C↔M (ABC≅NLM)' correct. 'A↔L, B↔M, C↔N (ABC≅LMN)' simply matches the vertices in the order they are written without checking the side lengths: AB (8 cm) would need to equal LM (10 cm), which is false. 'A↔M, B↔N, C↔L (ABC≅MNL)' also fails this check, since AB (8 cm) would need to equal MN (6 cm), which is false. 'A↔N, B↔M, C↔L (ABC≅NML)' gets A correct but swaps B and C, so AB (8 cm) would need to equal NM (6 cm), which is also false.
10. (a) 0.0069 — Leading zeros are not significant, so the significant figures in 0.006852 start at 6: 6, 8, 5, 2. Rounding to 2 significant figures means keeping 6 and 8, and looking at the next digit, 5, to decide whether to round up. Since 5 rounds up, the second significant figure increases from 8 to 9: 0.006852 rounds to 0.0069. A candidate who rounded to 1 significant figure instead of 2 wrote 0.007. A candidate who rounded to 3 significant figures instead of 2 wrote 0.00685. A candidate who did not round up despite the next digit being 5 wrote 0.0068.
11. (d) 0.7 — Method: delayed and not delayed are the only two outcomes, so the two probabilities form an exhaustive set and add to 1; subtract the given probability from 1. Working: 1 − 0.3, written as 1.0 − 0.3 with the decimal points lined up. Answer: 0.7. The distractors: 0.3 comes from giving back the probability that the train is delayed instead of its complement; 0.97 comes from lining the decimal points up wrongly and working out 1.00 − 0.03; 0.5 comes from assuming that delayed and not delayed must be equally likely because there are only two outcomes.
12. (b) −3 — Method: the gradient of a straight line is the change in y divided by the change in x, with the two coordinates taken in the same order in the numerator as in the denominator. Working: going from (−1, 5) to (3, −7), the change in y is −7 − 5 = −12 and the change in x is 3 − (−1) = 4, so the gradient is −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Answer: −3. The distractors: 3 comes from subtracting the y-coordinates in one order and the x-coordinates in the other, giving 12 ÷ 4; −1/3 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, giving 4 ÷ (−12); −6 comes from working out 3 − (−1) as 3 − 1 = 2, so that the change in y is divided by 2 rather than by 4.