⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) −1.4, −6/5, 0, 5/4, 1.3 — Method: convert the fractions 5/4 and −6/5 to decimals so every number is written the same way, then compare all five decimals. Working: 5/4 = 1.25 and −6/5 = −1.2. Comparing −1.4, −1.2, 0, 1.25 and 1.3 in size gives the order −1.4, −1.2, 0, 1.25, 1.3. Answer: −1.4, −6/5, 0, 5/4, 1.3. −6/5, −1.4, 0, 5/4, 1.3 swaps the two negative numbers, treating −6/5 as more negative than −1.4 even though −1.2 is closer to zero than −1.4. 1.3, 5/4, 0, −6/5, −1.4 lists the numbers from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. −1.4, −6/5, 0, 1.3, 5/4 swaps 5/4 and 1.3, comparing the numerator 5 directly with 1.3 instead of converting 5/4 to the decimal 1.25 first.
2. (b) 3p — p + p + p means three lots of p added together, and repeated addition of the same term is written as a coefficient: 3p. Writing p³ mistakes the repeated addition for repeated multiplication, as if the expression had been p × p × p. Writing 3 + p adds the number of terms (3) onto p as a separate constant, instead of writing 3 as a coefficient of p. Writing just p forgets to count the terms at all, as though repeating the same letter makes no difference. The simplified expression is 3p.
3. (a) −2 and 2 — Method: the graph crosses the x-axis where y = 0, so read the two crossing points straight off the curve. Working: the curve meets the horizontal axis two squares to the left of the origin and two squares to the right, at x = −2 and x = 2. Answer: −2 and 2. Distractor refutation: −4 and 4 comes from reading the value where the curve crosses the y-axis, −4, and using that value and its positive partner as the x-axis crossings instead. −2 and 3 comes from misreading the right-hand crossing point one square out along the grid, taking it where the curve is already above the axis. 0 and 2 comes from confusing the lowest point of the curve, which sits on the y-axis at x = 0, with one of the crossing points.
4. (b) Organiser favoured — expected pay-out is under £1 — The expected pay-out per game is the prize times the probability of winning: £4 × 1/5 = £0.80. The expected income per game is the £1 entry fee, which the organiser collects regardless of the result. Since £0.80 is less than £1, the game favours the organiser, because the expected pay-out is under £1. The claim that the game favours the player, because the pay-out is over £1, is wrong on both counts — the pay-out is not over £1, and it is the organiser who benefits. The claim that the organiser is favoured because the pay-out is over £1 reaches the right side but the wrong reason: £0.80 is under £1, not over it. The claim that the two expected amounts are equal is also wrong: £0.80 and £1 are different amounts, so the game is not fair to both sides.
5. (b) trapezium — A quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides is a trapezium; field ABCD has AB parallel to DC and no other pair of parallel sides, so trapezium is correct. Parallelogram requires BOTH pairs of opposite sides to be parallel, but the plan says only AB and DC are parallel. Rhombus requires all four sides to be equal in length, which is not stated here. A kite is defined by two pairs of adjacent equal sides, not by having a pair of parallel sides, so it does not match this description either.
6. (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
7. (a) 1/3 — Method: for two independent spinners, multiply the probability of each separate outcome, but first work out each spinner's own probability correctly, using how many of its equal sections actually carry that result. Working: Spinner A has 2 even numbers, 2 and 4, out of 4 sections, so P(even) = 2/4 = 1/2. Spinner B has 2 red sections out of 3, so P(red) = 2/3. Multiplying gives 1/2 × 2/3, which cancels down to 1/3. Answer: 1/3. Watch out: writing down 1/4 treats Spinner B's two colours as equally likely and uses 1/2 for red, when in fact 2 of its 3 sections are red — the sections are not split evenly between the two colours. Writing down 1/6 undercounts Spinner A's even numbers as just one out of four instead of two. And writing down 5/6 applies the 'at least one' formula, P(A) + P(B) − P(A)×P(B), which answers a different question about EITHER spinner landing the right way, not both together.
8. (b) 13/2 — Put the number of pages in the novel over the number of pages in the comic: 312/48. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 24: 312÷24 = 13, 48÷24 = 2, giving 13/2. (2/13 comes from writing the page counts the wrong way round. 11/2 comes from finding the difference in the page counts, 312 − 48 = 264, and writing it as a fraction of the comic's page count, 264/48. 13/15 comes from comparing the novel's page count to the total number of pages in both books, 312/360.)
9. (b) 1 — Method: BIDMAS deals with the index before the subtraction, and a negative number multiplied by itself gives a positive result. Working: (−2)² = (−2) × (−2) = 4, so the calculation becomes 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: 1. The distractors: −7 comes from squaring only the 2 and leaving the minus sign outside the index, giving −(2²) − 3 = −4 − 3 = −7; −1 comes from subtracting the square from 3 instead of 3 from the square, giving 3 − 4 = −1; 25 comes from carrying out the subtraction before the index, giving (−2 − 3)² = (−5)² = 25.
10. (b) 3/10 — Method: on a tree diagram, follow the path that matches the description and multiply the probabilities written along it; with nothing put back, the second set of branches is worked out from the counters that are left. Working: 3 of the 5 counters are yellow, so the first branch of the path is 3/5. A yellow counter has been kept out, so 4 counters remain and both green counters are still there, making the second branch 2/4. Multiplying along the path gives 6/20. Answer: the probability is 3/10. The distractors: 6/25 comes from using 2/5 on the second branch, which is the tree for a counter that is put back; 3/20 comes from taking one off the green count as well as off the total, using 1/4 on the second branch; 3/5 comes from reading the first branch only and never multiplying along the path.
11. (d) 13 — Method: the numbers of matchsticks form a sequence with a term-to-term rule, so count the first square in full and then add the repeated amount once for every extra square. Working: one square uses 4 matchsticks; a row of 4 squares has 3 extra squares after the first, and each of those adds 3 matchsticks, giving 3 × 3 = 9 to add on to the 4. Answer: 13. The distractors: 16 comes from counting each square as a separate set of 4 matchsticks, 4 × 4, and ignoring the shared sides; 12 comes from using 3 matchsticks for all four squares, 3 × 4, and forgetting that the first square needs a fourth side; 10 comes from adding the 3 only twice, as though a row of four squares had two extra squares rather than three.
12. (d) 3/2 — Work out the number of altos: 40% of 30 = 12. The rest are sopranos, so there are 30 − 12 = 18 sopranos. Form the fraction 18/12; both numbers share a factor of 6, so 18 ÷ 6 = 3 and 12 ÷ 6 = 2, giving 3/2. 2/3 comes from writing the fraction the wrong way round, as altos over sopranos (12/18). 3/5 comes from comparing the sopranos with the whole choir (18/30), instead of with the altos. 7/3 comes from miscalculating 30 − 12 as 28 instead of 18, then forming 28/12.