⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) −10 — Method: multiply each bracket out, treating the second bracket as being multiplied by −3 because it is subtracted, then collect like terms. Working: 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4 and −3(x + 2) = −3x − 6, so the expression becomes 8x − 4 − 3x − 6 − 5x; the x terms give 8x − 3x − 5x = 0, so no term in x survives, and the numbers give −4 − 6 = −10. Answer: −10. The distractors: 2 comes from expanding −3(x + 2) as −3x + 6, leaving the numbers −4 + 6; 5x − 10 comes from forgetting the final −5x, so the x terms give 8x − 3x = 5x; −7 comes from multiplying the 4 over only the first term of its bracket, giving 8x − 1 and so the numbers −1 − 6.
2. (d) 12 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 18 + 4(n − 1), set it equal to 62, and solve for n. Working: 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, so 4(n − 1) = 44, giving n − 1 = 11, so n = 12. Answer: row 12. 11 comes from using 18 + 4n = 62 instead of 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, an off-by-one error, giving n = 11. 48 comes from correctly simplifying to 4n = 48 but stopping there, without dividing by 4 to find n. 15.5 comes from dividing 62 by 4 directly, ignoring the 18 seats already in the front row.
3. (b) 1 : 2.25 — Method: to write a ratio in the form 1 : n, divide both parts by the first part. Working: 4 ÷ 4 = 1 and 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25, so 4 : 9 = 1 : 2.25. Working out 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25 correctly but then writing it as the first part gives 2.25 : 1, the two parts the wrong way round. Subtracting 9 − 4 = 5 gives 1 : 5, confusing the difference between the parts with the ratio. Multiplying 4 × 9 = 36 gives 1 : 36, confusing the product of the parts with the ratio.
4. (b) She is wrong; 12 rolls is too few to judge — Method: compare the result with what is expected, then ask whether the experiment is long enough for a difference to mean anything. Working: if the dice were fair the expected number of sixes in 12 rolls is 12 × 1 ÷ 6 = 2, so 4 sixes is 2 above what was expected. But over only 12 rolls a result like this turns up often by chance: the relative frequency here is 4/12, which is 1/3, and over so few trials a relative frequency can sit well away from 1/6 with no bias at all. Answer: Erin is wrong, because 12 rolls is far too few to decide; she should roll the dice many more times and see whether the relative frequency settles near 1/6. The distractors: saying she is right because 4 beats the expected 2 uses the correct expected value but treats any difference as proof, which so short an experiment cannot give; saying a fair dice gives each score twice in 12 rolls treats an expected value as a guaranteed one; saying that 4 sixes in 12 rolls cancels down to 1 in 6 mis-cancels the fraction, because 4/12 is 1/3, which is twice 1/6, so that comment reaches the right verdict from arithmetic that is wrong.
5. (b) 5/12 — There are 36 equally likely ordered pairs. Listing the pairs where the red score is smaller than the blue score gives 15 outcomes, so the probability is 15/36 = 5/12. Choosing 1/2 comes from assuming the 36 outcomes split evenly between 'red smaller' and 'red bigger', which ignores the 6 outcomes where the two dice show the same score. Choosing 7/12 comes from including the outcomes where the two scores are equal, 15 + 6 = 21, giving 21/36 = 7/12, instead of using 'less than' strictly. Choosing 5/36 comes from counting only the outcomes where the two scores differ by exactly 1, such as (1, 2) and (2, 3), which is 5 outcomes, and missing the pairs that differ by more than 1.
6. (d) 10 — Method: list the pairs systematically, taking each sweet in turn and pairing it only with the sweets that come after it, so that no pair is written down twice. Working: numbering the sweets 1 to 5, the first sweet pairs with 4 others, the second pairs with 3 sweets that come after it, the third with 2 and the fourth with 1, so the total is 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 20 comes from working out 5 × 4 and never halving, which counts each pair twice, once in each order; 25 comes from working out 5 × 5, which allows the same sweet to be chosen twice; 9 comes from adding the 5 choices and the 4 remaining choices instead of combining them as a selection of two.
7. (d) 4 — Method: each of the first draw's 2 outcomes can be paired with each of the second draw's 2 outcomes, since the counter is put back before the second draw, so the tree has one branch for every combination. Working: 2 × 2 = 4 outcomes: red-red, red-blue, blue-red, blue-blue. Answer: 4. Watch out: writing down 2 lists only the colours of a single draw and never branches out to a second draw at all. Writing down 3 treats red-then-blue and blue-then-red as the same branch, when the tree diagram shows them as two separate paths, since the counter is put back and either colour could come first or second. And writing down 16 comes from working out 2 × 2 × 2 × 2, as though the counter were drawn four times instead of twice.
8. (b) 9 — Subtract 14 from both sides: 4s ≤ 36. Divide both sides by 4: s ≤ 9, so the greatest number of tickets is 9. A candidate who forgets the £14 coach cost solves 4s ≤ 50, getting s ≤ 12.5, rounded down to 12. A candidate who adds the £14 instead of subtracting it solves 4s ≤ 64, getting s = 16. A candidate who miscalculates 50 − 14 as 32 solves 4s ≤ 32, getting s = 8.
9. (d) 4y — Method: the perimeter is the total distance round the outside of the shape, and a square has four sides all of the same length. Working: the four sides are y, y, y and y, so the perimeter is y + y + y + y, which is written as 4y. Answer: 4y. The distractors: 2y comes from adding only two of the four sides, as if the square were being treated like a rectangle with one length and one width; y² comes from working out the area of the square, y × y, instead of its perimeter; y + 4 comes from adding 4 to the side length instead of multiplying the side length by 4.
10. (d) 60 — Method: write the two supplementary angles as x and 2x, since one is twice the other, and solve x + 2x = 180. Working: 3x = 180, so x = 60. Answer: the smaller angle is 60°. A candidate who gives the larger angle, 2x, instead of the smaller angle gets 120. A candidate who uses a complementary sum of 90° instead of a supplementary sum of 180° gets 30. A candidate who divides 180 by 2 instead of by 3 gets 90.
11. (c) 36 — Method: set the outcomes out in a grid with one die along the top and the other down the side, so that every cell of the grid is one outcome, and count the cells. Working: the red die can land in 6 ways, so the grid has 6 columns, and the blue die can also land in 6 ways, so the grid has 6 rows; the number of cells is 6 × 6 = 36. Answer: 36. The distractors: 12 comes from adding 6 and 6 instead of multiplying them; 6 comes from counting the outcomes of a single die and forgetting that the second die also has to land; 21 comes from treating the two dice as indistinguishable, so that a red 2 with a blue 3 and a red 3 with a blue 2 are counted as one outcome.
12. (a) £3.00 per window — The gradient is the change in C divided by the change in w. Change in C = 26 − 14 = 12. Change in w = 6 − 2 = 4. Gradient = 12 ÷ 4 = £3.00 per window. Dividing the change in w by the change in C instead gives 4 ÷ 12 = £0.33 per window. Dividing 12 by the larger w-value only, 12 ÷ 6 = £2.00 per window, comes from not subtracting the smaller w-value first. Adding the w-values instead of subtracting, 12 ÷ (6 + 2) = £1.50 per window, comes from a sign error when finding the change in w.