⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 25 — Find the constant multiplier from the given pair: 15 ÷ 6 = 2.5, so y is always 2.5 times x. When x = 10, y = 10 × 2.5 = 25. 19 comes from assuming an additive relationship instead of a multiplicative one — adding the difference 15 − 6 = 9 onto 10. 4 comes from using the multiplier the wrong way round (6 ÷ 15 = 0.4) and then multiplying by 10. 15 comes from simply repeating the given value of y, without applying the multiplier to the new value of x at all.
2. (a) (2, 6) — To translate by the vector (−3, 4), add −3 to the x-coordinate and add 4 to the y-coordinate: (5 − 3, 2 + 4) = (2, 6). A pupil who adds 3 instead of subtracting for the x-coordinate gets (8, 6). A pupil who swaps the x- and y-components of the vector gets (5 + 4, 2 − 3) = (9, −1). A pupil who subtracts both components instead of adding the y-component gets (5 − 3, 2 − 4) = (2, −2). The correct image is (2, 6).
3. (d) £120 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the prize by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the share asked for. Working: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 parts, £360 ÷ 9 = £40 for one part, and the share asked for is 3 parts, so 3 × £40 = £120. Answer: £120. The distractors: £40 is the value of one part rather than of a 3-part share; £80 is the 2-part share; £160 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by picking the largest share instead of the one the question names.
4. (d) £5.40 — Method: work out the reduced price at each shop separately, then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: Shop A's reduced price is £45 × 0.8 = £36, and Shop B's reduced price is £34 × 0.9 = £30.60, so the difference is £36 − £30.60 = £5.40. Answer: £5.40. £11.00 comes from comparing the two ORIGINAL prices, £45 − £34, without applying either shop's reduction at all. £1.60 comes from finding Shop A's reduced price correctly, £36, but then subtracting Shop B's original (unreduced) price of £34 instead of its reduced price. £66.60 comes from adding the two reduced prices together, £36 + £30.60, instead of subtracting them.
5. (d) 1:4 — Convert 1.4 l to millilitres: 1.4 l = 1400 ml. The ratio is 350 : 1400. Divide both parts by 350: 350 ÷ 350 = 1 and 1400 ÷ 350 = 4, giving 1 : 4. Misreading 1.4 l as 14 (moving the decimal point) gives 350 : 14, which simplifies to 25 : 1 — a very different, implausible ratio. Dividing by 175 instead of 350 gives 2 : 8, which still shares a common factor of 2, so it is not fully simplified. Swapping the order gives 4 : 1, litres to millilitres the wrong way round.
6. (a) 2/3 — Total parts = 6 + 4 + 5 = 15. Sopranos and altos together are not tenors: 6 + 4 = 10 parts, so the fraction is 10/15, which simplifies to 2/3. 1/3 comes from finding the fraction of tenors instead of the fraction that is not tenors. 2/5 comes from counting only the sopranos as not tenors and leaving the altos out. 4/9 comes from leaving sopranos out of the total, 4 + 5 = 9, and then using only the altos as the fraction that is not tenors.
7. (d) £70 — Method: the discount is a percentage of the original price only, so work it out, subtract it, and add the fixed delivery charge afterwards. Working: 25% of £80 is £80 ÷ 4 = £20, so the discounted price is £80 − £20 = £60, and the total is £60 + £10 = £70. Answer: £70. The distractors: £60 comes from working out the discounted price and stopping there, leaving the delivery charge out of the total; £65 comes from taking £25 off the price instead of 25% of it, giving £80 − £25 = £55 and then £55 + £10 = £65; £67.50 comes from adding the delivery charge before the discount and reducing the whole amount, giving 75% of £90 = £67.50.
8. (a) 3x — Method: "three times as old" is a multiplication by 3, applied to the age that is known in terms of the letter. Working: the brother's age is x, and Leo's age is 3 × x, which is written as 3x. Answer: 3x. The distractors: x + 3 comes from reading "three times as old" as "three years older" and adding instead of multiplying; x − 3 comes from reading it as "three years younger" and subtracting; x/3 comes from dividing by 3 instead of multiplying, which describes the brother in terms of Leo rather than Leo in terms of the brother.
9. (c) £0.90 — Cost per kilogram = total cost ÷ mass. £4.50 ÷ 5 = £0.90. £1.11 comes from dividing the mass by the cost instead of the cost by the mass (5 ÷ 4.50). £22.50 comes from multiplying the cost by the mass instead of dividing (£4.50 × 5). £0.50 comes from subtracting the two numbers (5 − 4.50) instead of dividing.
10. (d) 8 cm — Convert 4 m to centimetres: 4 m = 400 cm. The scale 1 : 50 means the real object is 50 times the plan, so the plan length is the real length divided by 50: 400 ÷ 50 = 8, giving 8 cm. Using the length in metres instead of centimetres, 4 ÷ 50 = 0.08, gives 0.08 cm, far too small to draw. Misplacing a digit in the division gives 80 cm, ten times too big. Multiplying instead of dividing, 400 × 50 = 20 000, gives 20 000 cm — using the scale in the wrong direction, as if going from plan to real life instead of real life to plan.
11. (b) 12 cm — Method: the area of a rectangle is one side multiplied by the other, so when the area and one side are known the other side is found by reversing that multiplication — divide the area by the side that is known. Working: 96 ÷ 8 = 12. Answer: 12 cm. The distractors: 88 cm comes from 96 − 8, subtracting the known side as though the area had been made by adding the two sides together; 768 cm comes from 96 × 8, running the area rule forwards on the two numbers given instead of reversing it; 40 cm comes from reading the 96 as a perimeter — halving it to 48 and taking the 8 cm side away — which reverses the perimeter rule rather than the area rule.
12. (a) Game B, by £8 — Game A's expected total is 40 × 0.2 × £5 = £40. Game B's expected total is 40 × 0.1 × £12 = £48. Game B is higher, by £48 − £40 = £8. Writing 'Game A, by £8' is wrong because it has the right difference but the wrong game — Game A's total (£40) is actually LOWER than Game B's, not higher. Writing 'Game B, by £48' is wrong because £48 is Game B's whole expected total, not the DIFFERENCE between the two games. Writing 'Game A, by £40' is wrong in the same way, using Game A's whole total as if it were the margin, and naming the wrong game as the winner. Game B gives the higher expected total, by £8.