⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) 10 — Method: picking 3 flowers from 5 leaves 2 flowers behind, so counting the different pairs that could be left out counts the bunches, and those pairs can be listed systematically. Working: number the flowers 1 to 5; the first flower can be left out alongside any of the 4 flowers after it, the second alongside any of the 3 after it, the third alongside any of the 2 after it and the fourth alongside the last one, so the number of pairs left out is 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 60 comes from working out 5 × 4 × 3 and treating the three picks as an ordered selection when the order does not matter; 30 comes from dividing that product by 2 instead of by the 6 orders in which three chosen flowers could have been picked; 15 comes from multiplying the 5 flowers by the 3 flowers picked instead of counting the selections.
2. (a) 24 N/m² — Pressure = force ÷ area. 68.4 ÷ 2.85 = 24 N/m². 194.94 N/m² comes from multiplying the force by the area instead of dividing (68.4 × 2.85). 65.55 N/m² comes from subtracting the area from the force (68.4 − 2.85) instead of dividing. 0.04 N/m² comes from dividing the area by the force instead of the force by the area (2.85 ÷ 68.4).
3. (d) 19/100 — It is easier to first find the probability that NEITHER component is faulty, then subtract from 1. The probability a component is not faulty is 9/10, so the probability neither is faulty is 9/10 × 9/10 = 81/100. So the probability at least one is faulty is 1 − 81/100 = 19/100. Choosing 1/5 comes from adding the two probabilities of a fault instead, 1/10 + 1/10 = 1/5, which double-counts the case where both are faulty. Choosing 1/10 comes from giving the probability for just one component being faulty. Choosing 1/100 comes from squaring the probability of a fault directly, 1/10 × 1/10 = 1/100, which is actually the probability that BOTH are faulty, not at least one.
4. (b) 21 cm — By Pythagoras' theorem, the other side = √(29² − 20²) = √(841 − 400) = √441 = 21 cm. "9 cm" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 29 − 20 = 9, instead of subtracting their squares. "441 cm" is the value under the square root sign, correct as far as it goes but with the final square root step left out. "35 cm" comes from adding the squares of the two given lengths instead of subtracting them, √(29² + 20²) = √1241 ≈ 35, treating both given lengths as if they were the two shorter sides rather than a shorter side and the hypotenuse.
5. (b) 5 — From x + y = 7, x = 7 − y. Substituting into 3x + 2y = 16: 3(7 − y) + 2y = 16, so 21 − 3y + 2y = 16, giving 21 − y = 16, so y = 5 (then x = 2). A candidate who forgets to multiply the y-term inside the bracket by 3 would write 21 − y + 2y = 16, giving 21 + y = 16, so y = −5. A candidate who subtracts the two equations directly, (3x + 2y) − (x + y) = 16 − 7, gets 2x + y = 9, and if they wrongly treat this as giving y alone, ignoring the x term, they would answer 9. A candidate who reports the value of x instead of y would answer 2.
6. (c) (4, 3) — Method: the midpoint of a segment is the mean of its two end points, so its x-coordinate is the mean of the two x-coordinates and its y-coordinate is the mean of the two y-coordinates. Working: for x, (1 + 7) ÷ 2 = 8 ÷ 2 = 4. For y, (3 + 3) ÷ 2 = 6 ÷ 2 = 3. The midpoint is therefore (4, 3). Answer: (4, 3). The distractors: (3, 3) comes from halving the difference of the x-coordinates, (7 − 1) ÷ 2 = 3, which measures half the distance instead of locating the point; (3.5, 3) comes from halving only the larger x-coordinate and leaving the smaller one out of the working; (4, 0) comes from averaging the x-coordinates correctly but then subtracting the y-coordinates, 3 − 3, rather than averaging them.
7. (b) 3.5 — Method: work out each percentage of its number separately, then subtract the smaller result from the larger one. Working: 45% of 70 = 31.5, and 35% of 80 = 28, so the difference is 31.5 − 28 = 3.5. Answer: 3.5. 11.5 comes from pairing the percentages with the wrong numbers, working out 35% of 70 = 24.5 and 45% of 80 = 36, and finding their difference. 59.5 comes from adding the two correct results, 31.5 + 28, instead of subtracting them. 10 comes from simply subtracting the two percentages themselves, 45 − 35, without applying them to the numbers at all.
8. (c) 3 : 7 — Method: a ratio 'of A to B' is written with A first, and it is simplified by dividing both parts by their highest common factor. Working: vans are named first, so the ratio starts as 15 : 35; the highest common factor of 15 and 35 is 5, and 15 ÷ 5 = 3 while 35 ÷ 5 = 7. Answer: 3 : 7. The distractors: 7 : 3 comes from writing the two numbers in the order they appear in the question, cars before vans, instead of the order asked for; 3 : 10 comes from comparing the vans with the total number of vehicles, 15 : 50, a part-to-whole ratio in place of the part-to-part ratio asked for; 15 : 35 is the right comparison left unsimplified, and the question asks for the simplest form.
9. (d) £2.00 — Cost for Printer A = 200 × £0.04 = £8. Cost for Printer B = 200 × £0.05 = £10. Difference = £10 − £8 = £2.00.
10. (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
11. (b) 450.00 kg — 1 m³ = 100 × 100 × 100 = 1,000,000 cm³, so 0.5 m³ = 500,000 cm³. Mass = density × volume = 0.9 × 500,000 = 450,000 g. Converting to kilograms by dividing by 1000 gives 450,000 ÷ 1000 = 450.00 kg. Skipping the m³-to-cm³ conversion and multiplying 0.9 × 0.5 = 0.45 treats the volume as if it were already 0.5 cm³, giving 0.45 kg. Finding the mass correctly in grams, 450,000 g, but not converting to kilograms leaves 450000.00 kg, out by a factor of 1000. Using the area conversion factor of 10,000, as if converting m² to cm², instead of the volume factor of 1,000,000 gives 0.5 × 10,000 = 5,000 'cm³', and a mass of 0.9 × 5,000 = 4,500 g, which is 4.50 kg.
12. (c) No — 8 from one class is too small to represent the school. — Method: judge reliability by asking whether the sample is both large enough, and spread across the population, relative to what it is meant to represent. Working: 8 pupils is a tiny fraction of the school's 1,000 pupils, and all 8 come from a single class rather than a range of year groups, so the sample is both too small and too narrow to represent the whole school reliably. She is not right. Saying any sample size gives an equally reliable estimate ignores that reliability generally improves with a larger, more representative sample. Saying the method is unreliable because it was not done online is not a reason connected to sample size or representativeness at all. Saying 8 is reliable because it is more than half her class compares the sample to the wrong population — the school has 1,000 pupils, not one class. Always judge a sample's size against the population it is meant to represent, not against a smaller group within it.