⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) y = 3x + 2 — Method: divide the change in the outputs by the change in the inputs to find the multiplier, then put one pair of values into the rule to find the number added on. Working: the output rises by 11 − 5 = 6 while the input rises by 3 − 1 = 2, so the multiplier is 6 ÷ 2 = 3; with an input of 1, 3 × 1 = 3 and the output is 5, so 2 is added. Answer: y = 3x + 2, checked against the second pair by 3 × 3 + 2 = 11. The distractors: y = 3x − 2 comes from finding the multiplier 3 and then subtracting the 2 instead of adding it; y = 2x + 3 comes from swapping the multiplier and the number added on; y = x + 4 comes from assuming the input is multiplied by 1 and using 5 − 1 = 4 as the number added on.
2. (b) 54 — Method: round each number to the nearest whole number, then subtract the rounded values. Working: 79.3 rounds to 79 (nearest whole number) and 24.6 rounds to 25 (nearest whole number). 79 − 25 = 54. Answer: 54. 54.7 is the exact value of 79.3 − 24.6, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate. 55 comes from rounding 24.6 down to 24 instead of up to the nearest whole number, 25, giving 79 − 24. 59 comes from rounding 24.6 to the nearest 10, 20, instead of to the nearest whole number, 25, giving 79 − 20.
3. (d) 56 — Method: count the trials over the whole period first, then multiply the number of trials by the probability. Working: 4 weeks is 4 × 7 = 28 days, and at 25 trains a day that is 25 × 28 = 700 trains. The expected number of late trains is 700 × 0.08 = 56. Answer: about 56 late trains over the 4 weeks. The distractors: 2 is the expected number for a single day, 25 × 0.08 = 2, with the 28 days never brought in; 14 uses one week instead of four, 25 × 7 × 0.08 = 14; 644 is 700 − 56 and counts the trains expected to be on time.
4. (c) 5(x + y − 1) — Method: take out the highest common factor of all three terms and divide every term by it, the number term included. Working: the highest common factor of 5x, 5y and −5 is 5; dividing gives 5x ÷ 5 = x, 5y ÷ 5 = y and −5 ÷ 5 = −1, so the bracket holds x + y − 1. Answer: 5(x + y − 1), which multiplies back out to 5x + 5y − 5. The distractors: 5(x + y + 1) comes from dividing −5 by 5 and losing the minus sign; 5(x + y − 5) comes from dividing only the terms containing a letter by 5 and carrying the −5 into the bracket unchanged; 5(xy − 1) comes from collecting the unlike terms 5x and 5y as 5xy before factorising.
5. (d) The 750 g box, at 36p per 100 g — Work out the cost per 100 g of each box. 750 g box: 270p ÷ 7.5 = 36p per 100 g. 500 g box: 195p ÷ 5 = 39p per 100 g. The lower cost per 100 g is the better value, so the 750 g box at 36p per 100 g is the answer. Choosing the 500 g box at 39p per 100 g gets the maths right but picks the higher unit price, not realising a smaller cost per 100 g is the better deal. Choosing the 500 g box because £1.95 is lower than £2.70 compares the total prices without allowing for the different pack sizes at all. Working out 270 ÷ 5 = 54p divides the 750 g box's price by the wrong number of hundred-grams (the 500 g box's), giving a rate that belongs to neither box. The 750 g box, at 36p per 100 g, is the better value.
6. (b) x ≤ 4 — Method: undo the number subtracted from 3x first, then divide by 3; the direction of the sign changes only for division by a negative number. Working: adding 1 to both sides of 3x − 1 ≤ 11 gives 3x ≤ 12; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ 4. Answer: x ≤ 4. The distractors: x ≥ 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 3; x ≤ 10/3 comes from subtracting 1 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 3x ≤ 10; x ≤ 12 comes from stopping at 3x ≤ 12 and reading off the 12 without dividing by 3.
7. (b) 4% — Method: find the total interest earned, share it equally across the number of years to find one year's interest, then write it as a percentage of the amount invested. Working: total interest = £840 − £750 = £90, so one year's interest is £90 ÷ 3 = £30, and £30 as a percentage of £750 is (£30 ÷ £750) × 100 = 4%. Answer: 4%. 12% comes from treating the total interest of £90 as if it were earned in a single year, (£90 ÷ £750) × 100 = 12%, forgetting to divide by 3 years. 0.04% comes from finding the correct decimal, £30 ÷ £750 = 0.04, but forgetting to multiply by 100 to convert it into a percentage. 112% comes from writing the final amount, £840, as a percentage of the amount invested, £750, without first subtracting the £750 to find the interest alone.
8. (a) 2 — The common ratio is 54 ÷ 162 = 1/3, confirmed by 18 ÷ 54 = 1/3 and 6 ÷ 18 = 1/3. The next term is 6 × 1/3 = 2. A candidate who wrongly treats the sequence as arithmetic and subtracts the last difference (18 − 6 = 12) again gets 6 − 12 = −6. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing, effectively reversing the sequence, gets 18. A candidate who guesses the ratio is 1/2 gets 6 × 1/2 = 3.
9. (b) 25 — Substitute n = 7: 4 × 7 − 3 = 28 − 3 = 25. Forgetting to subtract 3 gives 4 × 7 = 28. Subtracting 3 from 7 before multiplying by 4, 4 × (7 − 3) = 16, applies the operations in the wrong order. Substituting n = 8 by miscounting the position gives 4 × 8 − 3 = 29.
10. (a) x = 0 gives y = −20: a negative number sold — The y-intercept is the value the line predicts when x = 0: y = 3 × 0 − 20 = −20. A kiosk cannot sell a negative number of ice creams, so this is not a sensible estimate. The 3 in the equation is the gradient, not the intercept, so an option claiming x = 0 gives y = 3 has swapped the two numbers around — substituting x = 0 makes the 3x term equal 0, leaving −20, not 3. The danger of extrapolating to very high temperatures is a real issue with this line, but it is a different issue from the y-intercept, so it does not answer this question. And whether x = 0 could occur on a trading day is beside the point: the model still makes that prediction, and it is the prediction itself, −20, that is impossible.
11. (d) 13 — Method: the numbers of matchsticks form a sequence with a term-to-term rule, so count the first square in full and then add the repeated amount once for every extra square. Working: one square uses 4 matchsticks; a row of 4 squares has 3 extra squares after the first, and each of those adds 3 matchsticks, giving 3 × 3 = 9 to add on to the 4. Answer: 13. The distractors: 16 comes from counting each square as a separate set of 4 matchsticks, 4 × 4, and ignoring the shared sides; 12 comes from using 3 matchsticks for all four squares, 3 × 4, and forgetting that the first square needs a fourth side; 10 comes from adding the 3 only twice, as though a row of four squares had two extra squares rather than three.
12. (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.