⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) $\binom{5}{-2}$ — Method: the top number of a column vector is the change in the x-coordinate and the bottom number is the change in the y-coordinate, each worked out as image minus object. Working: across, 7 − 2 = 5; up, 3 − 5 = −2. So the point moves 5 to the right and 2 down. Answer: $\binom{5}{-2}$. Subtracting the other way round, object minus image, gives $\binom{-5}{2}$, which is the journey from B back to A. Recording the vertical change as 2 because the gap between 3 and 5 is 2, without noting the direction, gives $\binom{5}{2}$, a movement 2 upwards. Adding the coordinates instead of subtracting them gives $\binom{9}{8}$.
2. (b) £13.50 — The total cost of Nadia's 25 tickets is 25 × £1.50 = £37.50. The expected number of winning tickets is 25 × 0.12 = 3, so the expected prize money is 3 × £8 = £24.00. Nadia's expected loss is the cost minus the expected prize money: £37.50 − £24.00 = £13.50. A candidate who answers £24.00 has given the expected prize money and mistaken it for the loss. A candidate who answers £37.50 has given the total cost of the tickets, forgetting to subtract the expected prize money. A candidate who answers £34.50 has subtracted the expected number of wins, 3, from the cost instead of first converting it to prize money by multiplying by £8.
3. (a) 3/8 — The whole prize fund is split into 3 + 5 = 8 equal parts. The smaller winner receives 3 of these parts, so their share is 3/8 of the whole fund. Taking the larger number of parts, 5, as the numerator instead gives 5/8, the larger winner's share. Writing the ratio numbers directly as a fraction without adding them, 3/5, treats the ratio as a fraction of the OTHER share rather than of the whole. Inverting the ratio gives 5/3, which is not even a valid fraction of a whole, since it is greater than 1.
4. (d) Isla is right, because 5 + 1 = 6 — Method: put the input through the machine yourself, then compare what comes out with the output claimed, and check that the reason given with the verdict is itself true. Working: the machine adds 1 to whatever is put in, so an input of 5 gives 5 + 1 = 6, which is exactly the output claimed. Answer: Isla is right, and the reason is that 5 + 1 = 6. The distractors: the statement that the machine adds 1 to its output describes a different machine — this one adds 1 to what goes in — so the verdict is right but the reason is false; 5 − 1 = 4 comes from running the machine backwards and subtracting instead of adding; 5 × 1 = 5 comes from reading ‘adds 1’ as ‘multiplies by 1’, which leaves the input unchanged.
5. (c) 8 hours 35 minutes — From 21:35 to midnight is 2 hours 25 minutes, and from midnight to 06:10 is a further 6 hours 10 minutes, giving a total of 8 hours 35 minutes. Misreading the departure time as 22:35 instead of 21:35 loses an hour from the calculation and gives 7 hours 35 minutes. Misreading the departure time as 20:35 instead of 21:35 gains an hour and gives 9 hours 35 minutes. Subtracting the times as if both fell on the same day, without crossing midnight, gives 15 hours 25 minutes.
6. (b) 5 — Method: the two points have the same y-coordinate, so the segment joining them runs horizontally and its length is the gap between the two x-coordinates; a length is a distance, so it is never negative. Working: the x-coordinates are 2 and −3, so the gap is 2 − (−3) = 2 + 3 = 5. Both points have y = −4, so there is no vertical part to add on. Answer: 5. The distractors: 1 comes from dropping the minus sign on −3 and working out 3 − 2 instead; 0 comes from subtracting the y-coordinates, which are equal, in place of the x-coordinates; 6 comes from counting the grid lines from −3 across to 2 inclusive, which counts one more than the number of gaps between them.
7. (a) SSA - not sufficient to prove congruence — The angle given, angle A, is not the angle between sides AB and BC — it is not the included angle — so this data is SSA (side, side, angle), which is not sufficient to prove congruence on its own; two triangles can share this SSA information without being congruent. SAS is wrong because the given angle is not the one included between the two given sides. ASA is wrong because only one angle (A) is given, not two. AAS is wrong for the same reason — only one angle is given, not two.
8. (b) 10.5 m² — The area of a trapezium is half of the sum of the parallel sides, multiplied by the width. Add the parallel sides: 2.5 + 4.5 = 7. Multiply by the width: 7 × 3 = 21. Half of 21 is 10.5 m². 21 m² forgets to halve, using the full (2.5+4.5)×3. 3.5 m² averages the two parallel sides, (2.5+4.5)÷2 = 3.5, but forgets to multiply by the width. 6.75 m² treats the bed as a triangle, using only the longer parallel side: half of 4.5 × 3.
9. (a) 32 cm² — Area of a trapezium = 1/2 × (sum of parallel sides) × height = 1/2 × (5 + 11) × 4 = 1/2 × 16 × 4 = 32 cm². (64 cm² comes from forgetting to halve the product; 44 cm² comes from using only the longer parallel side, 11 × 4, instead of both parallel sides; 20 cm² comes from adding all three given lengths together, 5 + 11 + 4, instead of using the area formula.)
10. (d) 140 — Method: round each number to the nearest 10, then add the rounded values. Working: 89 rounds to 90 (nearest 10) and 52 rounds to 50 (nearest 10). 90 + 50 = 140. Answer: 140. 141 is the exact value of 89 + 52, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate. 130 comes from rounding 89 down to 80 instead of up to the nearest 10, 90. 150 comes from rounding 52 up to 60 instead of down to the nearest 10, 50.
11. (b) 2, the cost in pounds of each extra gigabyte — Method: the gradient is the change in cost divided by the change in data, so it is the cost of each extra gigabyte; the value where the line meets the vertical axis is the charge before any data is used, which is a different quantity. Working: from (0, 10) to (8, 26) the cost rises by 26 − 10 = 16 pounds while the data rises by 8 − 0 = 8 gigabytes, so the gradient is 16 ÷ 8 = 2, meaning each extra gigabyte costs £2. Answer: 2, the cost in pounds of each extra gigabyte. The distractors: '10, the cost in pounds of each extra gigabyte' reads the intercept as the gradient, but 10 is what the tariff costs when no data at all has been used; '3.25, the cost in pounds of each extra gigabyte' comes from 26 ÷ 8, treating the line as though it passed through the origin when it starts at 10; '2, the fixed monthly charge in pounds' has the gradient right but describes the intercept, and the fixed charge on this tariff is £10.
12. (d) x = 3 — The table is symmetrical about the turning point: y = 0 at both x = 1 and x = 5, and the lowest value, y = −4, occurs exactly halfway between them, at x = 3. Choosing x = 5 picks one of the roots rather than the midpoint between them. Choosing x = 1 picks the other root for the same reason. Choosing x = 6 picks the x-value where y returns to its starting value of 5, which is not the turning point.