⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) 21 − 3n — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 15 − 18 = −3, 12 − 15 = −3, 9 − 12 = −3, so the terms decrease by 3 each time and the nth term has the form c − 3n. Substituting n = 1: c − 3(1) = 18, so c = 21. Answer: the nth term is 21 − 3n. The value 18 − 3n comes from using the first term as c directly, without adding back the difference that was removed. The value 3n − 21 comes from a sign error that flips the whole expression. The value −3n comes from using only the common difference and leaving out the constant.
2. (d) 23 — Method: find the number added each time, then add it to the first term once for every step between the first term and the term wanted. Working: 5 − 2 = 3, 8 − 5 = 3 and so on, so 3 is added each time; the 8th term is seven steps on from the 1st term, so it is 2 + 7 × 3 = 2 + 21. Answer: 23, which agrees with counting on from the 5th term: 14, 17, 20 and then one step more. The distractors: 26 comes from adding the common difference eight times instead of seven, 2 + 8 × 3; 20 comes from stopping one term early, at the 7th term; 24 comes from multiplying the position by the common difference, 8 × 3, and ignoring the fact that the sequence starts at 2 rather than at 3.
3. (a) 10.4 cm — The scale factor from the smaller triangle to the larger triangle is 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6, so the larger side is 6.5 × 1.6 = 10.4 cm. The distractor 4.0625 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 6.5 × 5 ÷ 8 = 4.0625. The distractor 9.5 cm comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers (8 − 5 = 3) to the given length, 6.5 + 3 = 9.5. The distractor 13 cm comes from doubling the given length, treating the scale factor as 2 instead of 1.6.
4. (b) No — their possible jump lengths do not overlap — Method: each recorded jump stands for the lengths within half of 0.1 m, that is 0.05 m, of the figure recorded, and Priya is right only if the two ranges overlap. Working: Priya's jump is at least 3.8 − 0.05 = 3.75 m and below 3.85 m, because a jump of 3.85 m would have been recorded as 3.9 m; Nadia's jump is at least 3.85 m and below 3.9 + 0.05 = 3.95 m. Every length Priya could have jumped is below 3.85 m and every length Nadia could have jumped is at least 3.85 m, so Nadia jumped further whatever the exact lengths were. Answer: No — their possible jump lengths do not overlap. The distractors: the reason that a recorded jump is exactly the length jumped reaches the same verdict by treating a rounded record as exact, which is the idea this question tests; both jumps being 3.85 m would put 3.85 m inside Priya's range, when a jump of that length is recorded as 3.9 m; Priya jumping up to 3.9 m goes a whole 0.1 m above her record instead of half of it.
5. (c) 1.6 — The multiplier from tins to pounds is found by dividing the cost by the number of tins: £8 ÷ 5 = 1.6. 0.625 comes from dividing the wrong way round, tins ÷ cost (5 ÷ 8), which is the multiplier from pounds back to tins. 3 comes from subtracting the number of tins from the cost (8 − 5), instead of dividing. 40 comes from multiplying the cost by the number of tins (8 × 5), instead of dividing.
6. (b) likely — On the probability scale, 'certain' is reserved for a probability of exactly 1, and 'evens' describes a probability of exactly 0.5. A probability of 0.9 is high but not equal to 1, so the correct word is 'likely'. Choosing 'certain' treats a probability close to 1 as if it were exactly 1, which it is not. Choosing 'evens' misjudges 0.9 as being close to the midpoint of the scale, when it is close to the 'certain' end instead. Choosing 'unlikely' reads the scale the wrong way round, as if a high probability meant a low chance of happening.
7. (a) 11 — Method: work out each term separately using the rule n² − 3, then subtract. Working: 6th term = 6² − 3 = 36 − 3 = 33. 5th term = 5² − 3 = 25 − 3 = 22. Difference: 33 − 22 = 11. Answer: 11. 8 comes from subtracting the constant −3 once at the end instead of it already being included in both terms, (36 − 25) − 3. 1 comes from working out (6 − 5)² instead of finding 6² and 5² separately and then subtracting. −11 comes from subtracting in the wrong order, the 5th term minus the 6th term instead of the 6th minus the 5th.
8. (c) 36 cm² — Method: the area of a square is its side length multiplied by itself. Working: 6 × 6 = 36. Answer: 36 cm². The distractors: 24 cm comes from working out the perimeter, 4 × 6, which is a length and not an area; 12 cm comes from doubling the side, 6 × 2, instead of squaring it; 18 cm² comes from halving the product, (6 × 6) ÷ 2, using the rule for the area of a triangle.
9. (c) £7617.60 — To decrease by 8% each year, multiply by 0.92 (100% − 8%) twice. £9000 × 0.92 × 0.92 = £7617.60. £7560.00 comes from treating the two 8% decreases as a single flat 16% decrease applied once instead of compounding: £9000 × 0.84 = £7560.00. £8280.00 comes from applying the 8% decrease only once, for 1 year instead of 2: £9000 × 0.92 = £8280.00. £10497.60 comes from multiplying by 1.08 twice, increasing the value instead of decreasing it: £9000 × 1.08 × 1.08 = £10497.60.
10. (b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
11. (c) Noah — 11/32 = 0.34375, above 34%. — Converting 11/32 to a decimal gives 11 ÷ 32 = 0.34375, which is greater than 34% (0.34), so Noah has the better save rate: 'Noah — 11/32 = 0.34375, above 34%.' Comparing the raw numbers 34 and 11 directly, without converting the fraction to the same form, gives 'Elin — 34 is bigger than 11.' Treating a larger denominator as meaning a bigger value, rather than smaller equal shares, gives 'Noah — 32 is a bigger denominator.' Rounding 34.375% to 34% to the nearest whole percent hides the difference and gives 'Equal — both round to 34% to the nearest percent.'
12. (c) 1 — Method: a right angle measures 90°, the three angles of any triangle add up to 180°, and a right-angled triangle is defined as a triangle that contains a right angle. Working: taking one right angle out of the total leaves 180° − 90° = 90° to be shared between the other two angles, so both of those must be acute; a second right angle would use the whole of that remaining 90° and leave nothing at all for the third angle, which is impossible. The definition therefore fixes the count at exactly one. Answer: 1. The distractors: 2 comes from counting the two sides that form the right angle instead of counting the angles themselves; 3 comes from reading the name as a description of the whole triangle, so that all three of its angles are taken to be right angles, which would need an angle sum of 3 × 90° = 270°; 0 comes from over-applying the angle sum — a candidate who works out that 90° + 90° = 180° leaves nothing for a third angle can conclude from that alone that no triangle may contain a right angle at all.