⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) Ben, because a larger sample is closer to the theory — Method: a relative frequency is an estimate of a probability, and for an unbiased experiment that estimate tends towards the theoretical value as the sample grows. Working: Priya's estimate rests on 50 results, so a few unexpected heads move it a long way; one extra head shifts her relative frequency by 1 ÷ 50 = 0.02. Ben's estimate rests on 500 results, where one extra head shifts his relative frequency by only 1 ÷ 500 = 0.002. The larger sample therefore swings far less around the true value. Answer: Ben's relative frequency is the one more likely to be close, because a larger unbiased sample tends closer to the theoretical probability. The distractors: saying a small sample is less affected by luck reverses the result, since it is the small sample that swings most; saying every flip is a separate random event is true of the flips themselves but says nothing about the estimates, and is often used to argue wrongly that the number of trials does not matter; saying 500 flips must give exactly 250 heads confuses an expected value with a guaranteed one, and 500 flips very rarely give exactly 250 heads.
2. (c) It is not representative, as she picked her own friends — Method: judge a sample by asking whether the pupils in it were chosen in a way that gives the whole school a fair chance of being heard. Working: Isla's friends are a group she formed herself, and friends tend to share tastes, so their favourite programme is likely to match hers rather than the school's, and pupils in other year groups and other friendship groups had no chance at all of being asked; the fault lies in how the pupils were selected, not in how many of them there were. Answer: it is not representative, as she picked her own friends. The distractors: the reply blaming the size claims the pupils were picked at random, which is false here, and it is the common mistake of thinking a biased sample can be cured by making it bigger; the reply calling the sample too large is false in the other direction, as a survey is never spoilt by collecting more replies; the reply that the sample is fine treats attending the school as enough, which would make any group of pupils in the building a fair sample.
3. (c) 8x − 12 — Multiply each term inside the bracket by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12. A candidate who forgets to multiply the second term by 4 gets 8x − 3. A candidate who makes a sign error, treating 4 × (−3) as +12, gets 8x + 12. A candidate who adds 4 to the bracket instead of multiplying gets 2x + 1.
4. (c) √3/2 — Method: sin 60° comes from half of an equilateral triangle. Cut an equilateral triangle of side 2 down its middle: each half is right-angled, with hypotenuse 2 and base 1, and Pythagoras gives its height as √3 because 2² − 1² = 3. Working: sine is the opposite side over the hypotenuse, the side opposite the 60° angle is the height √3, and the hypotenuse is 2, so sin 60° = √3 ÷ 2. Answer: sin 60° = √3/2. Swapping sine for cosine at this angle gives cos 60° = 1/2; taking the value from the other special triangle, the right-angled isosceles one, gives sin 45° = √2/2; and reading the tangent row instead of the sine row gives tan 60° = √3.
5. (d) Yes, since 3² + 4² = 5² — AB is horizontal with length 5 − 1 = 4, BC is vertical with length 4 − 1 = 3, and CA = √(4² + 3²) = √25 = 5. Since the two shorter sides satisfy 3² + 4² = 5², the triangle is right-angled, with the right angle at B. "No, since 3 + 4 ≠ 5" wrongly tests Pythagoras' theorem by adding the sides instead of squaring them first. "No, since AB, BC and CA are not all equal" confuses a right-angled triangle with an equilateral one — a triangle does not need equal sides to have a right angle. "Yes, since 4² + 5² = 3²" reaches the correct conclusion but puts the longest side, 5, on the wrong side of the equation, as if it were one of the two shorter sides instead of the hypotenuse.
6. (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
7. (a) 17 — Method: work out each power separately, then combine them as the question asks. Working: $2^3 = 8$ and $3^2 = 9$, and 8 + 9 = 17. 72 comes from working out 8 × 9 = 72, multiplying the two powers instead of adding them. 12 comes from misreading the powers as repeated multiplication of the base by the index, 2 × 3 + 3 × 2 = 6 + 6 = 12. −1 comes from working out 8 − 9 = −1, subtracting the powers instead of adding them. Answer: 17.
8. (a) 3.375 — Method: the volume scale factor between similar shapes is the length scale factor cubed, not the length scale factor itself. Working: the length scale factor is 12 ÷ 8 = 1.5, and 1.5³ = 3.375. Answer: 3.375. Jayden's answer, 1.5, is only the LENGTH scale factor — he never cubed it to get the volume scale factor. 2.25 comes from squaring the length scale factor instead of cubing it, which would give the area scale factor. 4.5 comes from multiplying the length scale factor by 3 (the number of dimensions) instead of cubing it.
9. (d) 1/20 — Mia has 25 of the 500 tickets, so the probability she wins is 25/500 = 1/20, dividing the top and the bottom by 25. Writing 19/20 is wrong because that is the probability she does NOT win (1 − 1/20 = 19/20), the opposite of what is asked. Writing 1/25 is wrong because it puts 1 over the number of tickets Mia holds, as though her 25 tickets were the whole raffle — the denominator has to be the 500 tickets sold, not her own share. Writing 1/10 is wrong because it treats the raffle as having only 250 tickets instead of the actual 500: 25/250 = 1/10. The probability that Mia wins is 1/20.
10. (b) 3p — p + p + p means three lots of p added together, and repeated addition of the same term is written as a coefficient: 3p. Writing p³ mistakes the repeated addition for repeated multiplication, as if the expression had been p × p × p. Writing 3 + p adds the number of terms (3) onto p as a separate constant, instead of writing 3 as a coefficient of p. Writing just p forgets to count the terms at all, as though repeating the same letter makes no difference. The simplified expression is 3p.
11. (d) −2 — Method: run the machine backwards, undoing the operations in the opposite order and swapping each one for its inverse. Working: the machine added 7 last, so take 7 off the output: 1 − 7 = −6; before that the machine had multiplied by 3, so divide: −6 ÷ 3, and a negative divided by a positive stays negative. Answer: −2, which checks because 3 × (−2) + 7 = −6 + 7 = 1. The distractors: 2 comes from dividing 6 by 3 and losing the minus sign; −6 comes from taking the 7 off and stopping there, never undoing the multiplication; −18 comes from multiplying −6 by 3 instead of dividing by 3.
12. (d) 2 — Method: if f is 3 times e, then each part of f equals 3 times the matching part of e. Working: using the bottom numbers, 6 = 3 × k, so k = 2. Answer: k = 2. A candidate who multiplies instead of dividing, working out 6 × 3, gets 18. A candidate who uses the top numbers' ratio instead, 15 ÷ 5, and gives that ratio as k gets 3. A candidate who adds instead of using the multiple relationship, working out 6 + 3, gets 9.