⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 8.1 m — Multiply the length on the plan by the scale factor: 4.5 × 1.8 = 8.1, so the real length is 8.1 m. Choosing 6.3 m adds the two numbers instead of multiplying them (4.5 + 1.8 = 6.3). Choosing 2.5 m divides the plan length by the scale factor the wrong way round (4.5 ÷ 1.8 = 2.5) instead of multiplying. Choosing 9.0 m rounds the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying (4.5 × 2 = 9.0), losing the accuracy the 1.8 was giving.
2. (c) y = 9x + 3 — Method: in a linear cost model the charge that is paid once is the constant term and the charge made for each item is the coefficient of x. Working: each pizza costs £9, so x pizzas cost 9x pounds; the £3 delivery fee is paid once whatever the value of x, so it is added on as a constant and the total cost is y = 9x + 3. Answer: y = 9x + 3. The distractors: y = 3x + 9 comes from swapping the two charges over, treating the £3 delivery as a per-pizza cost and the £9 as the one-off charge; y = 9x leaves out the delivery fee altogether, which undercharges every order by £3; y = 12x comes from adding the delivery fee to the price of each pizza, £9 + £3 = £12 each, so the fee is charged once per pizza instead of once per order.
3. (a) 0 — Method: BIDMAS works through the index first, then the multiplication, then the subtraction. Working: 5² = 25, then 4 × 25 = 100, and finally 100 − 100 = 0. Answer: 0. The distractors: 2400 comes from working from left to right and subtracting first, giving (100 − 4) × 25 = 96 × 25 = 2400; −300 comes from multiplying before applying the index, giving (4 × 5)² = 20² = 400 and then 100 − 400 = −300; 60 comes from reading 5² as 5 × 2 = 10, so that 4 × 10 = 40 and 100 − 40 = 60.
4. (a) 1/16 — The two spins are independent, so multiply the probability of blue on each spin: 1/4 × 1/4 = 1/16. Choosing 1/2 comes from adding the two probabilities instead of multiplying, 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/2. Choosing 1/8 comes from wrongly treating the second spin as having a 1/2 chance of blue instead of the given 1/4, giving 1/4 × 1/2 = 1/8. Choosing 1/4 comes from giving the probability for a single spin and forgetting that the spinner is spun twice.
5. (b) 8.64 m — The real length is 240 times the model length: 3.6 × 240 = 864 cm. Converting to metres, 864 cm ÷ 100 = 8.64 m. The distractor 864 m comes from finding the length correctly in centimetres but forgetting to convert to metres. The distractor 0.0864 m comes from dividing by 100 a second time, converting 864 cm to metres twice over (864 ÷ 10 000) instead of once. The distractor 86.4 m comes from converting centimetres to metres by dividing by 10 instead of 100.
6. (d) 5 — Method: since the triangles are congruent by SAS, the corresponding sides AB and DE must be equal, because both are the side next to the given right angle that is not BC or EF. Working: AB = DE gives 2x + 3 = 13, so 2x = 10, so x = 5. Options: 10 comes from dropping the coefficient of x and solving x + 3 = 13 instead of 2x + 3 = 13; 4 comes from matching AB to the wrong side, EF, giving 2x + 3 = 11, so 2x = 8, so x = 4; 8 comes from a sign error, solving 2x − 3 = 13 instead of 2x + 3 = 13, giving 2x = 16, so x = 8. Answer: 5.
7. (a) 753 — The estimate from 2000 spins is the most reliable, since it comes from the largest sample size, so the best estimate of the probability is 0.251. Over a further 3000 spins, the expected number landing on green is 3000 × 0.251 = 753. Writing 1050 is wrong because 3000 × 0.350 = 1050 uses the estimate from only 20 spins, the LEAST reliable of the three. Writing 870 is wrong because 3000 × 0.290 = 870 uses the estimate from 200 spins rather than the more reliable 2000-spin estimate. Writing 750 is wrong because 3000 × 0.25 = 750 ignores the recorded data completely and simply assumes each of the 4 colours is equally likely. The best estimate is 753 expected green spins.
8. (d) 15/64 — Method: because the first marble is put back, the second draw is made from the same 8 marbles, so the two draws are independent and their probabilities are multiplied. Working: the bag holds 8 marbles both times, so yellow first has probability 5/8 and blue second has probability 3/8. Multiplying fractions gives 5 × 3 = 15 on the top and 8 × 8 = 64 on the bottom. Answer: the probability is 15/64. The distractors: 9/64 comes from working out the probability that BOTH marbles are blue, 3/8 × 3/8, instead of one of each colour in the stated order; 15/16 comes from multiplying the numerators but adding the denominators; 5/8 comes from writing down the first draw only and never combining it with the second.
9. (b) SAS (two sides and the included angle) — PQ = ST and QR = TU are two pairs of matching sides, and the angle between them (angle Q and angle T) is 90° in both triangles — two sides and the angle between them are equal, so the triangles are congruent by SAS, using only the measurements given. RHS needs the hypotenuses to be known equal; here only the two legs are given, so you would first have to work out each hypotenuse by Pythagoras' theorem — extra working the question rules out. SSS has the same problem: the third side of each triangle is not given, only calculable. ASA needs two angles and the side between them, but here it is two sides and the angle between them that are given, not two angles.
10. (d) £48 — Scale factor = new width ÷ original width = 40 ÷ 10 = 4. Poster height = 15 × 4 = 60 cm. Cost = 60 × £0.80 = £48. (£12 comes from forgetting to scale the height at all, and pricing the original 15 cm height; £15.20 comes from adding the scale factor 4 to the height instead of multiplying by it; £3 comes from dividing the height by the scale factor instead of multiplying by it.)
11. (d) 1100 — Method: to combine two samples of different sizes, add the faulty counts together and add the sample sizes together before scaling up, rather than treating the two samples separately. Working: the combined sample found 34 + 21 = 55 scratched cases out of 100 + 50 = 150 cases checked, a proportion of 55 ÷ 150. Applying that proportion to the week's production of 3,000 gives an estimate of 55 ÷ 150 × 3000 = 1100 scratched cases. Averaging the two shifts' proportions instead of combining their totals, (34 ÷ 100 + 21 ÷ 50) ÷ 2 = 0.38, gives 0.38 × 3000 = 1140 — this treats the two samples as equally weighted even though Shift A checked twice as many cases as Shift B. Using only Shift A's sample, 34 ÷ 100 × 3000 = 1020, ignores Shift B's cases completely. Using only Shift B's sample, 21 ÷ 50 × 3000 = 1260, ignores Shift A's cases completely. When two samples are different sizes, combine their totals before finding the proportion — do not average the two proportions, and do not use only one shift's sample.
12. (b) 5/9 — Add the parts of the ratio to find how many equal shares make up the whole: 4 + 5 = 9 shares. The blue counters take 5 of those 9 shares, so 5/9 of the counters are blue. 4/9 is the fraction that are red, 4/5 is the ratio copied straight down as a fraction, and 5/4 compares the blue counters with the red counters instead of with the whole box.