⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 58° — In an isosceles triangle, the base angles opposite the equal sides are equal. Since DE = DF, angle F is the base angle equal to angle E, so angle F = 58°.
2. (d) 5/18 — Method: list every ordered pair of dice scores whose difference is 1, then divide by the 36 equally likely pairs. Working: the pairs with a difference of 1 are (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 4), (4, 3), (4, 5), (5, 4), (5, 6) and (6, 5), which is 10 pairs out of 36, cancelling down to 5/18. Answer: 5/18. Watch out: writing down 5/36 lists only the 5 pairs going up, (1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 4), (4, 5) and (5, 6), and misses that each one has a matching pair the other way round, such as (2, 1) — the two dice are different objects, and order matters, so each of those 5 gaps counts twice. Writing down 1/6 treats the six possible differences, 0 to 5, as equally likely and picks 1 out of 6 of them, but a difference of 1 is reached by far more pairs of scores than a difference of 5 is, so the six differences are not equally likely. And writing down 1/4 comes from adding the two dice's outcome counts instead of multiplying them, 6 + 6 = 12, and grouping the six scores into just three non-overlapping pairs one apart, {1, 2}, {3, 4} and {5, 6}, giving 3 out of that wrong pool of 12.
3. (b) 50° — Method: the three angles of a triangle add up to 180°, and the two angles opposite the equal sides are equal, so subtract the given angle from 180° and halve the remainder. Working: 180° − 80° = 100°, and 100° ÷ 2 = 50°. Answer: 50°. The distractors: 100° comes from subtracting from 180° and forgetting to halve, so it is the two equal angles together; 40° comes from halving the 80° that is given rather than halving what is left of the 180°; 80° comes from assuming that the two base angles must match the angle between the equal sides.
4. (a) 8/5 — Scaling down from 8 people to 5 people uses the multiplier 5/8. To reverse this and scale back up from 5 people to 8 people, use the reciprocal of that multiplier: flip 5/8 to get 8/5. 5/8 comes from using the forward (scaling down) multiplier again, instead of reversing it. 3/5 comes from writing the difference in people (8 − 5 = 3) over 5, instead of using the reciprocal of 5/8. 25/64 comes from multiplying the forward multiplier by itself (5/8 × 5/8), instead of finding its reciprocal.
5. (b) 57/100 — Pooling both trials: total heads = 24 + 33 = 57, total flips = 40 + 60 = 100, so the combined relative frequency is 57/100, which is already in its simplest form since 57 and 100 share no common factor. Averaging the two separate relative frequencies instead, (24/40 + 33/60) ÷ 2 = (0.6 + 0.55) ÷ 2 = 0.575 = 23/40, treats the two trials as equally weighted even though Ben made more flips, which is not correct. Using only Leah's data gives 24/40 = 3/5. Using only Ben's data gives 33/60 = 11/20.
6. (b) 270° — Bearings are measured clockwise from north (000°). Due north is 000°, due east is 090°, due south is 180° and due west is 270°. Choosing 090° gives the bearing for due east, not west. Choosing 180° gives the bearing for due south. Choosing 000° gives the bearing for due north.
7. (c) 71 — Method: square x first, then multiply by 3, then subtract 4, following the order of operations. Working: x² = 5² = 25; 3 × 25 = 75; 75 − 4 = 71. Answer: 71. 221 comes from squaring (3x) as a whole first: (3 × 5)² = 225, then − 4 = 221, squaring the coefficient along with x. 75 comes from correctly working out 3x² but forgetting to subtract the 4. 3 comes from subtracting the 4 from x before squaring: (5 − 4)² × 3 = 3, doing the operations in the wrong order.
8. (b) (2 + 3) × 5 − 1 — 2 + 3 = 5, then 5 × 5 = 25, then 25 − 1 = 24, so the brackets belong around 2 + 3. Placing them around 5 − 1 instead gives 5 − 1 = 4, then 3 × 4 = 12, then 2 + 12 = 14. Leaving the multiplication bracketed instead changes nothing, because it already had priority: 3 × 5 = 15, then 2 + 15 = 17, then 17 − 1 = 16. Bracketing both 2 + 3 and 5 − 1 uses two pairs instead of the one asked for: 2 + 3 = 5, 5 − 1 = 4, then 5 × 4 = 20.
9. (c) AB and CD are equal in length — AB = CD states that the line segments AB and CD are equal in length; it says nothing about their direction or position. 'AB is parallel to CD' would be written AB ∥ CD, not AB = CD. 'A, B, C and D all lie on one line' is not what an equals sign between two segment names states at all. 'AB is perpendicular to CD' would be written AB ⊥ CD, not AB = CD.
10. (c) £338.69 — To increase by 12% each year, multiply by 1.12 twice. £270 × 1.12 × 1.12 = £338.688, which rounds to £338.69 (nearest penny, since the third decimal place is 8). £334.80 comes from treating the two 12% increases as a single flat 24% increase applied once instead of compounding: £270 × 1.24 = £334.80. £302.40 comes from applying the 12% increase only once, for 1 year instead of 2: £270 × 1.12 = £302.40. £338.68 comes from rounding £338.688 down to the nearest penny instead of up.
11. (a) 100 — The difference between the parts of the ratio is 7 − 3 = 4 parts, and this is worth 40 beads. Divide to find one part: 40 ÷ 4 = 10. The total number of parts is 7 + 3 = 10, so the total number of beads is 10 × 10 = 100. (40 is just the given difference between gold and silver, not the total. 70 is the number of gold beads only, using 7 parts. 30 is the number of silver beads only, using 3 parts.)
12. (d) (0, 4) — Method: in the form y = mx + c the constant c is the y-coordinate of the point where the line crosses the y-axis, and every point on that axis has x-coordinate 0. Working: comparing y = 2x + 4 with y = mx + c gives c = 4, and substituting x = 0 confirms y = 2 × 0 + 4 = 4, so the crossing point is (0, 4). Answer: (0, 4). The distractors: (4, 0) is the same pair of numbers written in the wrong order and is a point on the x-axis; (0, 2) comes from reading the gradient 2 as the intercept, confusing m with c; (−2, 0) is where the line crosses the x-axis, found by solving 0 = 2x + 4 instead.