⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) −2 — Method: place the two end values on a number line and list the integers that sit strictly between them. Working: reading from left to right the integers run −4, −3, −2, −1, so the values strictly between the ends are −3 and −2. Only one of those is offered. Answer: −2. The distractors: −5 comes from ordering negatives by the size of their digits, which wrongly places −5 to the right of −4; 0 comes from carrying on past −1 instead of stopping at it; 2 comes from ignoring the minus signs and choosing a number between 1 and 4.
2. (c) The mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3. — Method: work each measure out before the extra value is added and again afterwards, then compare the size of the two changes. Working: before, the six values total 42, so the mean is 42 ÷ 6 = 7, and the middle pair 6 and 8 give a median of (6 + 8) ÷ 2 = 7; after, the seven values total 142, so the mean is 142 ÷ 7 = 20.29 to 2 decimal places, while the median is now the 4th of the seven ordered values, which is 8; the mean has moved by about 13.3 and the median by 1. Answer: the mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3 — this is why the median is often preferred when a data set contains an outlier. The distractors: the reply that the mean rises by 100 adds the extra value to the mean instead of adding it to the total; the reply that the median moves to 12 takes the largest of the original values as the new middle instead of counting to the 4th of the seven values; the reply about even and odd counts quotes a rule that does not exist, since the median moved because a very large value was added, not because the count of values changed.
3. (a) the second quadrant — Method: the quadrant is settled by the signs of the two coordinates, not by their size; the quadrants are numbered anticlockwise, starting from the region where both coordinates are positive. Working: the x-coordinate −3 is negative, so the point lies to the left of the y-axis; the y-coordinate 0.5 is positive, so it lies above the x-axis; the region that is both left of the y-axis and above the x-axis is the second. Answer: the second quadrant. The distractors: 'the first quadrant' comes from ignoring the minus sign on −3; 'the third quadrant' comes from treating 0.5 as a negative value because it is smaller than 1, when in fact any number above zero is positive; 'the fourth quadrant' comes from reading the pair the wrong way round, as though the point were (0.5, −3).
4. (c) 155° — Turning clockwise adds to the bearing. Starting on a bearing of 065° and turning clockwise through 90° gives 065° + 90° = 155°. A candidate who instead subtracts, working out 90° − 65° = 25°, has performed the wrong operation, giving 025°. A candidate who turns anticlockwise instead of clockwise works out 065° − 90°, which gives a negative number, and adding 360° to fix this gives 335° — the bearing for turning the other way. A candidate who thinks turning does not change the bearing at all keeps the answer as 065°. The new bearing, turning clockwise, is 155°.
5. (a) x + 3 — Method: "years older" is an addition, and the number of years is added to the age that is known in terms of the letter. Working: Jack's age is x, and Kwame is 3 years older, so Kwame's age is x + 3. Answer: x + 3. The distractors: x − 3 comes from reading "older" as "younger" and subtracting instead of adding; 3x comes from reading "3 years older" as "3 times as old" and multiplying; 3 − x comes from writing the calculation the wrong way round, taking Jack's age from the 3 rather than adding.
6. (c) 0.65 — Overrunning and not overrunning are exhaustive: between them they cover every outcome, so their probabilities sum to 1. Work out 1 − 0.35 = 0.65. Writing 0.35 again is the probability that the appointment overruns, not its complement — the subtraction was never done. Adding instead of subtracting gives 1 + 0.35 = 1.35, which cannot be a probability at all. Subtracting each digit from 10 instead of borrowing from the 1, so 10 − 3 = 7 tenths and 10 − 5 = 5 hundredths, gives 0.75.
7. (d) £200 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total paid by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the most expensive item. Working: 2 + 3 + 5 = 10 parts, £400 ÷ 10 = £40 for one part, and the most expensive item is 5 parts, so 5 × £40 = £200. Answer: £200. The distractors: £40 is the value of one part; £80 is the 2-part item, the cheapest of the three; £120 is the 3-part item.
8. (d) 7n + 5 — Method: find the rate charged per extra chair, then find the fixed part of the cost that fits hiring 1 chair. Working: the cost rises by £7 for each extra chair (19 − 12 = 7, 26 − 19 = 7, 33 − 26 = 7), so the cost has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 12, so c = 5. Answer: the cost in pounds is 7n + 5. The value 7n comes from ignoring the fixed part of the charge entirely. The value 7n + 12 comes from using the cost of 1 chair as the fixed part directly, without subtracting the per-chair rate first. The value 12n + 7 comes from swapping the roles of the cost of hiring 1 chair, £12, and the rate per extra chair, £7 — using the total for one chair as the coefficient of n and the rate as the fixed part.
9. (d) £48 — Scale factor = new width ÷ original width = 40 ÷ 10 = 4. Poster height = 15 × 4 = 60 cm. Cost = 60 × £0.80 = £48. (£12 comes from forgetting to scale the height at all, and pricing the original 15 cm height; £15.20 comes from adding the scale factor 4 to the height instead of multiplying by it; £3 comes from dividing the height by the scale factor instead of multiplying by it.)
10. (a) 5/36 — Method: list every result of the two dice as an ordered pair, first score then second score, count the pairs that give the total asked for and divide by how many pairs the list holds. Working: each dice can show 6 scores, so there are 6 × 6 = 36 equally likely ordered pairs. The pairs whose scores add to 6 are (1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 2) and (5, 1), which is 5 pairs out of the 36. Answer: the probability is 5/36. The distractors: 4/36 comes from listing (1, 5), (5, 1), (2, 4) and (4, 2) and leaving (3, 3) out, because a double does not look like a pair that can be turned round; 5/12 comes from finding the 5 pairs but taking the number of possible results to be 6 + 6 = 12, adding the two dice instead of multiplying them; 1/11 comes from treating the eleven possible totals 2, 3, 4 and so on up to 12 as equally likely, so that a total of 6 is one result out of eleven.
11. (b) 6 — 3n + 4.5 = 22.5, so 3n = 18 and n = 6. A candidate who divides 22.5 by 3 first and ignores the 4.5 gets n = 7.5. A candidate who makes a sign error and forms the equation 3n − 4.5 = 22.5 gets 3n = 27 and n = 9. A candidate who divides by 3 before subtracting the 4.5, working out 22.5 ÷ 3 + 4.5, gets n = 12.
12. (c) 15 cm — Method: going from the smaller tile to the larger one, every length is multiplied by the scale factor 5 ÷ 3. Working: 9 ÷ 3 = 3, and 3 × 5 = 15. Answer: 15 cm. The distractors: 11 cm comes from adding the difference between the parts of the ratio, 5 − 3 = 2, to the 9 cm side, treating a ratio as a gap rather than a multiplier; 45 cm comes from multiplying by 5 and forgetting to divide by 3; 27 cm comes from multiplying by 3, which is the part of the ratio belonging to the smaller tile.