⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) (4, 3) — Method: the midpoint of a segment is the mean of its two end points, so its x-coordinate is the mean of the two x-coordinates and its y-coordinate is the mean of the two y-coordinates. Working: for x, (1 + 7) ÷ 2 = 8 ÷ 2 = 4. For y, (3 + 3) ÷ 2 = 6 ÷ 2 = 3. The midpoint is therefore (4, 3). Answer: (4, 3). The distractors: (3, 3) comes from halving the difference of the x-coordinates, (7 − 1) ÷ 2 = 3, which measures half the distance instead of locating the point; (3.5, 3) comes from halving only the larger x-coordinate and leaving the smaller one out of the working; (4, 0) comes from averaging the x-coordinates correctly but then subtracting the y-coordinates, 3 − 3, rather than averaging them.
2. (a) 3/4 — Write January's total over February's total: 360/480. Both numbers share a factor of 120, so dividing top and bottom by 120 gives 3/4. Choosing 4/3 comes from writing February's amount over January's amount, the wrong way round. Choosing 1/4 comes from finding the difference between the two months (480 − 360 = 120) and writing it over February's amount, instead of using January's amount. Choosing 3/7 comes from writing January's amount over the total received across both months (360 out of 840), instead of over February's amount alone.
3. (d) 4x + 5 — A minus sign directly before a bracket changes the sign of both terms inside it: 6x − (2x − 5) = 6x − 2x + 5 = 4x + 5. The option 4x − 5 comes from only changing the sign of the 2x term and not the −5, giving 6x − 2x − 5. The option 8x − 5 comes from adding 2x instead of subtracting it, as if the minus sign did not apply to the bracket, giving 6x + 2x − 5. The option 8x + 5 repeats that same addition mistake and also changes the sign of the −5 term.
4. (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
5. (d) 1.2 × 10⁵ — 4 × 3 = 12, and 3 + 1 = 4, giving 12 × 10⁴ — but 12 is not between 1 and 10, so this must be rewritten as 1.2 × 10⁵. Stopping at 12 × 10⁴ without rewriting it leaves the coefficient out of range. Rewriting 12 as 1.2 but leaving the exponent at 4 instead of increasing it to 5 gives 1.2 × 10⁴, which is ten times too small. Adding the coefficients instead of multiplying them gives 4 + 3 = 7, so 7 × 10⁴.
6. (d) 15:20 — Method: add all three journey segments to the departure time, converting the total number of minutes into hours and minutes. Working: 55 + 20 + 40 = 115 minutes = 1 hour 55 minutes. 13:25 + 1 hour 55 minutes = 15:20. Answer: 15:20. (15:00 comes from leaving out the 20 minute break and adding only 55 + 40 = 95 minutes. 14:25 comes from leaving out the 55 minute first leg and adding only 20 + 40 = 60 minutes. 14:40 comes from leaving out the 40 minute second leg and adding only 55 + 20 = 75 minutes.)
7. (d) 50 — Speed = distance ÷ time, so 150 ÷ 3 = 50 km/h. (450 comes from multiplying 150 by 3 instead of dividing. 153 comes from adding 150 and 3. 147 comes from subtracting 3 from 150 — none of these use the correct compound-unit calculation, distance ÷ time.)
8. (a) 3 cm² — Area scale factor = (linear scale factor)² = (1/4)² = 1/16. Area of T = 48 × 1/16 = 3 cm². (12 cm² comes from multiplying by the linear scale factor 1/4 directly, without squaring it; 24 cm² comes from taking the square root of the scale factor instead of squaring it; 768 cm² comes from squaring the reciprocal of the scale factor, 4, instead of the scale factor itself.)
9. (d) 8 cm — Convert 4 m to centimetres: 4 m = 400 cm. The scale 1 : 50 means the real object is 50 times the plan, so the plan length is the real length divided by 50: 400 ÷ 50 = 8, giving 8 cm. Using the length in metres instead of centimetres, 4 ÷ 50 = 0.08, gives 0.08 cm, far too small to draw. Misplacing a digit in the division gives 80 cm, ten times too big. Multiplying instead of dividing, 400 × 50 = 20 000, gives 20 000 cm — using the scale in the wrong direction, as if going from plan to real life instead of real life to plan.
10. (d) 3/50 — Relative frequency is the number of faulty bolts divided by the total sample size: 15/250, which simplifies to 3/50 by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by 5. Using 235, the number of bolts that were NOT faulty, as the denominator instead of the total 250 gives 15/235, which simplifies to 3/47. Inverting the fraction, dividing the total by the number of faulty bolts instead of the other way round, gives 250/15, which simplifies to 50/3 — a value greater than 1, which cannot be a probability. Simplifying by dividing the numerator and the denominator by different numbers, 15 ÷ 15 = 1 and 250 ÷ 25 = 10, gives 1/10.
11. (b) 18 — Method: convert the real length to centimetres, then divide by the scale factor to shrink it down to the model's size. Working: 4.32 m = 432 cm; 432 cm / 24 = 18 cm. A student who answers 432 has converted the units correctly but forgotten to divide by the scale factor at all. A student who answers 10368 has multiplied by the scale factor instead of dividing (432 x 24). A student who answers 1.8 has converted the metres to centimetres by multiplying by 10 instead of 100, getting 43.2 cm, and then divided by 24. Answer: 18 cm.
12. (c) 8 m — Method: in the same sunlight every object has its height and its shadow in the same ratio, so write 2:3 = h:12, find the multiplier that takes 3 to 12 and apply it to the height. Working: 12 ÷ 3 = 4, so the tree's shadow is 4 times the post's shadow; the height must be scaled by the same 4, giving 4 × 2 = 8 m. Answer: 8 m. The distractors: 18 m comes from setting up the proportion upside down, 12 ÷ 2 × 3, which scales by shadow over height instead of height over shadow; 24 m comes from multiplying the 12 m shadow by the post's height of 2 m and never dividing by the post's shadow of 3 m; 4 m is the scale factor 12 ÷ 3, given as a length instead of being used to scale the 2 m post.