⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) c = k/6 — k = 6c means c has been multiplied by 6, so to make c the subject, divide both sides by 6: c = k/6. Writing c = 6k multiplies by 6 again instead of undoing the multiplication. Writing c = k − 6 mistakes multiplying for adding, and subtracts 6 rather than dividing. Writing c = 6 − k reverses the order as well as the operation. The correct rearrangement is c = k/6.
2. (b) 15 pupils — The frequencies are 5, 4, 3 and 3 pupils, and 5 + 4 + 3 + 3 = 15, so there are 15 pupils in the class. Choosing 6 pupils comes from adding the numbers of pets, 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, instead of the frequencies. Choosing 10 pupils comes from leaving out the '0 pets' row: 4 + 3 + 3 = 10. Choosing 18 pupils comes from counting the '3 pets' row twice: 5 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 18.
3. (a) 314 cm² — Method: the area of a circle is πr², and the radius is half the diameter, so halve the 20 cm before squaring. Working: r = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 cm, so the area is 3.14 × 10² = 3.14 × 100 = 314. Answer: 314 cm². The distractors: 1256 cm² comes from putting the diameter straight into πr² without halving it, 3.14 × 20²; 628 cm² comes from halving correctly but then using 2πr², a mixture of the circumference and area formulae; 62.8 cm² comes from working out πd = 3.14 × 20, which is the circumference of the plate rather than its area.
4. (c) 693 — Method: multiplying a bracket by a number multiplies every term inside it, so 7 × (100 − 1) = 7 × 100 − 7 × 1. Working: 7 × 100 = 700 and 7 × 1 = 7, so the calculation becomes 700 − 7 = 693. Answer: 693. The distractors: 699 comes from subtracting the 1 itself rather than 7 lots of it, giving 700 − 1 = 699; 707 comes from adding the second product instead of subtracting it, giving 700 + 7 = 707; 700 comes from rounding 99 up to 100 and then offering the estimate 7 × 100 as an exact value.
5. (d) (0, −10) — The y-intercept occurs where x = 0. Substituting x = 0 into y = x² + 3x − 10 gives y = 0 + 0 − 10 = −10, so the graph crosses the y-axis at (0, −10). The option (0, 3) mistakenly uses the coefficient of x instead of the constant term. The option (0, 10) makes a sign error, dropping the negative from the constant term. The option (−10, 0) swaps the x- and y-coordinates, which would instead be a point on the x-axis, not the y-axis.
6. (c) tan θ = opposite/adjacent — The tangent ratio is defined as tan θ = opposite/adjacent, so this is the ratio that connects the opposite and adjacent sides. "sin θ = opposite/adjacent" wrongly labels this ratio as sine, when sine actually connects the opposite side and the hypotenuse. "cos θ = opposite/adjacent" wrongly labels it as cosine, when cosine connects the adjacent side and the hypotenuse. "tan θ = adjacent/opposite" uses the correct ratio name but has the opposite and adjacent sides the wrong way round.
7. (c) Sam is correct — The leading zeros in 0.070268 are not significant, so the first three significant figures are 7, 0 and 2. The next digit along is 6, and since 6 is 5 or more, the third significant figure rounds up from 2 to 3, giving 0.0703. This means Sam's answer is correct. Writing 0.070 keeps only 2 significant figures, one short of what was asked. Writing 0.0702 ignores the digit 6 that follows and leaves the third figure unrounded. Writing 0.0704 rounds the third figure up twice, as if a later digit had also pushed it up.
8. (b) 32p — £3.20 is 320p, and 1 kg is 1000 g, which is 10 lots of 100 g. Divide the price in pence by 10: 320 ÷ 10 = 32p per 100 g. Dividing 320 by 100 instead of 10 gives 3.2p, using the wrong number of hundred-grams in a kilogram. Multiplying 320 by 10 instead of dividing gives 3200p. Forgetting to convert pounds to pence and dividing 3.20 by 10 gives 0.32, which is still in pounds rather than pence. Rice costs 32p per 100 g.
9. (b) 3, 6, 9, 12 — Method: substitute the positions n = 1, 2, 3 and 4 into the rule in turn, because a position-to-term rule gives each term from its own position number. Working: 3 × 1 = 3, 3 × 2 = 6, 3 × 3 = 9 and 3 × 4 = 12. Answer: 3, 6, 9, 12. The distractors: 3, 9, 27, 81 comes from reading 3n as 3 multiplied by itself n times and so multiplying by 3 at every step; 0, 3, 6, 9 comes from starting the count at n = 0, which shifts every term one place; 4, 5, 6, 7 comes from reading 3n as n + 3 and adding 3 to each position number instead of multiplying by 3.
10. (d) 4 — Method: each of the first draw's 2 outcomes can be paired with each of the second draw's 2 outcomes, since the counter is put back before the second draw, so the tree has one branch for every combination. Working: 2 × 2 = 4 outcomes: red-red, red-blue, blue-red, blue-blue. Answer: 4. Watch out: writing down 2 lists only the colours of a single draw and never branches out to a second draw at all. Writing down 3 treats red-then-blue and blue-then-red as the same branch, when the tree diagram shows them as two separate paths, since the counter is put back and either colour could come first or second. And writing down 16 comes from working out 2 × 2 × 2 × 2, as though the counter were drawn four times instead of twice.
11. (b) 70 — Saloon, estate and hatchback are exhaustive, so their probabilities sum to 1: the probability of a hatchback is 1 − 0.28 − 0.37 = 0.35. The number of hatchbacks is 0.35 × 200 = 70. Treating the SUM of the other two probabilities, 0.28 + 0.37 = 0.65, as the probability of a hatchback instead of its complement gives 0.65 × 200 = 130. Multiplying the correct probability, 0.35, by 100 instead of the 200 cars actually surveyed gives 35. Averaging the two given probabilities, (0.28 + 0.37) ÷ 2 = 0.325, instead of subtracting them from 1, and then multiplying by 200 gives 65.
12. (b) 22.8% — Relative frequency as a percentage is the faulty count divided by the total, then multiplied by 100: 33 ÷ 145 × 100 = 22.76, which rounds to 22.8%. Giving 33.0% as the answer uses the frequency, 33, directly as a percentage without dividing by the total 145 at all. Rounding 22.76 down to 22.7% instead of up applies the wrong rounding direction at the first decimal place. Finding the relative frequency of the bulbs that were NOT faulty first: 145 − 33 = 112, and 112 ÷ 145 × 100 = 77.24, answers the opposite question and rounds to 77.2%.