⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 9/5 — Method: the area of a rectangle is its length multiplied by its width; the decimal product is then written over a power of ten and cancelled. Working: 24 × 75 = 1800, and 2.4 and 0.75 have three decimal places between them, so 2.4 × 0.75 = 1.8; the area of the panel is 1.8 square metres, which is eighteen tenths, so it can be written as 18/10, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 gives 9 over 5. Answer: 9/5. The distractors: 4/5 comes from converting only the digits after the decimal point and losing the whole one, turning 1.8 into eight tenths; 63/20 comes from adding the two sides instead of multiplying them, giving 3.15; 9/50 comes from misplacing the decimal point in the product and writing 0.18, which cancels to 9 over 50.
2. (b) x = y − 7 — The letter x has 7 added to it, and the inverse of adding 7 is subtracting 7. Subtracting 7 from both sides leaves x on its own on the right, giving y − 7 = x, which is written x = y − 7. Adding 7 to both sides instead repeats the operation rather than undoing it; writing 7 − y reverses the subtraction, which changes the sign of the whole expression; writing 7y treats the addition as a multiplication.
3. (b) On average a plant grew 1.5 cm taller for each extra day — Method: in the equation of a line, the number multiplying x is the gradient, and a gradient states the change in y produced by an increase of 1 in x, read in the units of the two axes. Working: here x is measured in days and y in centimetres, so the gradient 1.5 carries the units centimetres per day. Testing it on the line, 5 days gives 1.5 × 5 + 4 = 11.5 cm and 6 days gives 1.5 × 6 + 4 = 13 cm, a rise of 1.5 cm for the one extra day. Answer: on average a plant grew 1.5 cm taller for each extra day of watering. The distractors: 1.5 cm as the height before any watering is the value of y when x is 0, which is the other number in the equation, 4 cm, so this swaps the gradient and the intercept; 1.5 cm as the gap between the tallest and the shortest plant reads the gradient as a range, when a range is a difference between two of the 16 plants and a gradient is a rate; 1.5 days for each extra centimetre inverts the rate, dividing days by centimetres instead of centimetres by days, and the line gives 1 cm of growth in two thirds of a day.
4. (d) 7/3 — Put the kettle's energy over the toaster's energy: 2.1/0.9. Multiply both numbers by 10 to clear the decimals: 21/9. Divide both by their highest common factor, 3: 21÷3 = 7, 9÷3 = 3, giving 7/3. (3/7 comes from writing the energy values the wrong way round. 4/3 comes from finding the difference, 2.1 − 0.9 = 1.2 kWh, and writing it as a fraction of the toaster's energy, 1.2/0.9. 7/10 comes from comparing the kettle's energy to the total energy used by both appliances, 2.1/3.0.)
5. (c) SAS - two sides and the included angle equal — Two sides (AB and BC) and the angle between them (angle B) are equal in both triangles, so this is SAS. SSS would need all three sides given, but only two sides are stated. ASA needs two angles and the side between them, but only one angle is given. AAS needs two angles and a side, but again only one angle is given here.
6. (b) 1 : 3 — Write the two lengths as a ratio: 5 : 15. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 5, to give 1 : 3. Writing 3 : 1 swaps the order, comparing B to A instead of A to B. Leaving the ratio as 5 : 15 has not been simplified. Finding 1 : 2 comes from comparing the smaller length to the gap between the two lengths (15 − 5 = 10, then wrongly simplifying 5 : 10), not from comparing the two lengths themselves.
7. (c) L/5 − 3 — Each of the 5 equal pieces is L/5 metres long, and removing 3 metres from one piece gives L/5 − 3. Subtracting the 3 metres before dividing by 5, (L − 3)/5, divides the removed length between all 5 pieces instead of taking it from just one. Dividing only the 3 by 5 instead of dividing L by 5, L − 3/5, divides the wrong number. Writing 5/L − 3 inverts the fraction, swapping which number is the numerator.
8. (d) £48 — Scale factor = new width ÷ original width = 40 ÷ 10 = 4. Poster height = 15 × 4 = 60 cm. Cost = 60 × £0.80 = £48. (£12 comes from forgetting to scale the height at all, and pricing the original 15 cm height; £15.20 comes from adding the scale factor 4 to the height instead of multiplying by it; £3 comes from dividing the height by the scale factor instead of multiplying by it.)
9. (c) 3/16 — The probability that Priya misses a shot is 1 − 3/4 = 1/4. The two shots are independent, so multiply the probability of scoring the first shot by the probability of missing the second shot: 3/4 × 1/4 = 3/16. Choosing 9/16 comes from using the probability of scoring, 3/4, for both shots instead of switching to the miss probability for the second shot, 3/4 × 3/4 = 9/16, which is the probability that she scores with both shots. Choosing 1/2 comes from subtracting the two probabilities instead of multiplying them, 3/4 − 1/4 = 1/2. Choosing 3/4 comes from giving only the probability that she scores with the first shot, forgetting to combine it with what happens on the second shot.
10. (b) (5, −2) — Reflecting in the x-axis keeps the x-coordinate the same and changes the sign of the y-coordinate, so (5, 2) → (5, −2). ((−5, 2) comes from reflecting in the y-axis instead, changing the sign of the x-coordinate; (−5, −2) comes from changing the sign of both coordinates, as for a reflection in the origin; (2, 5) comes from swapping the coordinates, which is what happens for a reflection in the line y = x.)
11. (b) 1 : 2.25 — Method: to write a ratio in the form 1 : n, divide both parts by the first part. Working: 4 ÷ 4 = 1 and 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25, so 4 : 9 = 1 : 2.25. Working out 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25 correctly but then writing it as the first part gives 2.25 : 1, the two parts the wrong way round. Subtracting 9 − 4 = 5 gives 1 : 5, confusing the difference between the parts with the ratio. Multiplying 4 × 9 = 36 gives 1 : 36, confusing the product of the parts with the ratio.
12. (d) 12 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 18 + 4(n − 1), set it equal to 62, and solve for n. Working: 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, so 4(n − 1) = 44, giving n − 1 = 11, so n = 12. Answer: row 12. 11 comes from using 18 + 4n = 62 instead of 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, an off-by-one error, giving n = 11. 48 comes from correctly simplifying to 4n = 48 but stopping there, without dividing by 4 to find n. 15.5 comes from dividing 62 by 4 directly, ignoring the 18 seats already in the front row.