⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 26.6 — h² = 1.6² = 2.56, so B = 68 ÷ 2.56 = 26.5625, which rounds to 26.6 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets to square the height gets 68 ÷ 1.6 = 42.5. A candidate who squares the mass instead of the height gets 68² ÷ 1.6 = 2890.0. A candidate who truncates 26.5625 instead of rounding it gets 26.5.
2. (c) −8 — (−2)³ = (−2) × (−2) × (−2) = −8, since multiplying three negative numbers gives a negative result. A candidate who forgets the sign of a negative number when cubing it might treat (−2)³ as if it were 2³ = 8. A candidate who multiplies −2 by 3 instead of cubing it might get −2 × 3 = −6. A candidate who combines both mistakes — multiplying by 3 and dropping the sign — might get 2 × 3 = 6.
3. (a) 13 °C — Method: subtract the lowest temperature from the highest temperature to find the difference. Working: the highest temperature is 6 °C and the lowest is −7 °C. Difference = 6 − (−7) = 6 + 7 = 13. Answer: 13 °C. 8 °C comes from using −2 °C as the lowest temperature instead of −7 °C: 6 − (−2) = 8. 5 °C comes from finding the difference between the two negative temperatures instead of the highest and lowest: −2 − (−7) = 5. −1 °C comes from adding the highest and lowest temperatures instead of subtracting: 6 + (−7) = −1.
4. (a) 2b — Method: a total cost is the price of one item multiplied by the number of items bought. Working: each pen costs £2 and there are b pens, so the total cost is 2 × b, which is written as 2b. Answer: 2b. The distractors: b + 2 comes from adding the price to the number of pens instead of multiplying, treating £2 as a one-off charge; 2b + 2 comes from multiplying correctly and then adding the £2 a second time as though there were also a fixed charge; b/2 comes from dividing by the price instead of multiplying by it.
5. (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
6. (d) 3, 6, 12, 24 — Method: a term-to-term rule is applied to the term just written, so start with the first term and use the rule three more times. Working: the first term is 3; 3 × 2 = 6 is the second; 6 × 2 = 12 is the third; 12 × 2 = 24 is the fourth. Answer: 3, 6, 12, 24. The distractors: 3, 5, 7, 9 comes from adding 2 each time instead of multiplying by 2; 3, 9, 27, 81 comes from multiplying by the first term, 3, instead of by the multiplier 2 the rule gives; 6, 12, 24, 48 comes from doubling before writing anything down, so the list starts one term too late and the given first term is missing.
7. (b) 4,700 — To round to the nearest 100, look at the digit in the tens column, which decides whether the hundreds column rounds up or stays the same. In 4,685 that digit is 8, and since 8 is 5 or more, the 6 in the hundreds column rounds up to 7, giving 4,700. Simply changing the last two digits to zero without checking the tens digit gives 4,600, which rounds down when it should round up. Rounding to the nearest 10 instead of the nearest 100 gives 4,690. Rounding to the nearest 1,000 instead gives 5,000, one place value too coarse.
8. (c) 2π cm — Method: the circumference of a circle is 2πr, where r is the radius, or equivalently πd, where d is the diameter. Working: r = 1, so the circumference is 2 × π × 1 = 2π cm. Answer: 2π cm. The distractors: π cm comes from using the formula πd but substituting the radius in place of the diameter; 4π cm comes from doubling twice — changing the radius into the diameter of 2 cm and then putting that diameter into 2πr as though it were a radius; π cm² is the area of this circle, π × 1², and comes from reaching for the area formula when a distance round the outside was asked for, which is why it carries a squared unit.
9. (a) The tape can only give the length to the nearest centimetre — Method: a measurement should never be written to a finer degree of accuracy than the instrument used can read. Working: the tape is marked in centimetres, so the smallest division Leah can read is 1 cm, which is 0.01 m and two decimal places in metres; writing 7.3157 m claims the length to the nearest tenth of a millimetre, four decimal places, which the markings cannot support. A record of 7.32 m, to the nearest centimetre, is what this tape justifies. Answer: The tape can only give the length to the nearest centimetre. The distractors: the nearest millimetre contradicts the markings described in the question, which are centimetres, and would still claim more accuracy than the tape offers; the rule that a length in metres must be written to 2 decimal places borrows the habit of writing money to the penny, when the accuracy of a length depends on the instrument; rounding to the nearest metre would throw away accuracy the tape genuinely provides.
10. (c) 6x(2x + 3) — The highest common factor of 12x² and 18x is 6x. Dividing each term by 6x gives 12x² ÷ 6x = 2x and 18x ÷ 6x = 3, so 12x² + 18x = 6x(2x + 3). A candidate who only takes out the number 6 (missing the x) gets 6(2x² + 3x), which is not fully factorised. A candidate who only takes out 2x (missing the extra factor of 3 in 6) gets 2x(6x + 9), also not fully factorised — the bracket still shares a common factor. A candidate who takes out 3x instead of the full 6x gets 3x(4x + 6), which again is not fully factorised since 4x + 6 shares a common factor of 2.
11. (d) Only families with strong feelings bothered to reply. — Method: a survey has non-response bias when only some of the people asked actually reply, and those who do are not a typical cross-section of everyone who was asked. Working: only 30 of the 200 families sent back their questionnaire, and 27 of those 30 — the great majority — said they were unhappy. Families who feel strongly about an issue, particularly those with a complaint, are far more likely to make the effort to reply than families who are simply satisfied and see no need to say anything, so the 30 replies over-represent unhappy families. Saying the families who replied were picked at random by the school gets the sampling the wrong way round: nobody picked them — they picked themselves by deciding to reply, and that is precisely why they are not a typical cross-section of all 200. Saying postal surveys always have low response rates restates that the response was low without explaining why a low response rate, on its own, makes a result unrepresentative — it is the reason FOR the low response, not the low response itself, that causes the bias here. Saying that the 27 unhappy replies show most families are unhappy is exactly the mistake the question is warning against: it treats the loudest 30 replies as if they stood for the other 170 who never sent theirs back. A low response rate is a warning sign only because the people who bother to reply are rarely typical of everyone who was asked.
12. (b) £96.90 — Method: multiply the number of units by the cost per unit, then convert the result from pence to pounds. Working: 340 × 28.5p = 9690p; converting to pounds, 9690p ÷ 100 = £96.90. Answer: £96.90. £969.00 comes from misplacing the decimal point when converting pence to pounds, dividing by 10 instead of 100. £9.69 comes from misplacing the decimal point the other way, dividing by 1000 instead of 100. £102.00 comes from rounding the rate to 30p per unit before multiplying.