⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 8 cm — Area of a trapezium = (sum of parallel sides) ÷ 2 × height, so 45 = (a + 10) ÷ 2 × 5. Dividing 45 by 5 gives 9, so (a + 10) ÷ 2 = 9, meaning a + 10 = 18, so a = 18 − 10 = 8 cm. A pupil who correctly finds that the two parallel sides add up to 18 but forgets to subtract the known side of 10 cm gives the sum of both parallel sides, 18 cm, as the answer. A pupil who then adds 10 again by mistake instead of subtracting gets 18 + 10 = 28 cm. A pupil who halves the correct answer by mistake gets 8 ÷ 2 = 4 cm. The correct length of the other parallel side is 8 cm.
2. (b) 10.5 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length. Working: 7 cm × 1.5 = 10.5 m. A student who answers 8.5 has added the scale factor to the drawing length instead of multiplying (7 + 1.5). A student who answers 14 has rounded the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying. A student who answers 3.5 has divided the drawing length by 2 instead of multiplying it by 1.5. Answer: 10.5 m.
3. (a) 2/3 — Method: 'in A or in B' means every score that belongs to at least one of the two sets; a score that belongs to both is still only one outcome, so it is listed once. Working: the even scores are 2, 4 and 6; the scores greater than 4 are 5 and 6. Listing the scores that appear in either set gives 2, 4, 5 and 6, with 6 written once. That is 4 of the 6 faces, or 4/6. Answer: the probability is 2/3. The distractors: 5/6 comes from adding the sizes of the two sets, 3 + 2, so that the score 6 is counted in both and appears twice; 1/2 comes from using the even scores alone; 1/6 comes from giving the probability that the score is in both sets, which is the single score 6, rather than in either of them.
4. (c) 2/5 — To find a fraction of a fraction, multiply them together: 3/5 × 2/3 = 6/15, which simplifies to 2/5. Multiplying only the numerators, 3 × 2 = 6, but adding the denominators, 5 + 3 = 8, instead of multiplying them gives 6/8, which simplifies to 3/4. Using only the fraction who study French, 3/5, and ignoring that a further fraction of them also study Spanish gives 3/5. Dividing by 2/3 instead of multiplying by it, using its reciprocal 3/2, gives 3/5 × 3/2 = 9/10.
5. (b) No, it needs one more square — A closed cube has exactly 6 faces, so its net must be made of exactly 6 identical squares, arranged so each one unfolds to a separate face with none overlapping. This net has only 5 squares, so it is one square short and cannot be folded into a closed cube. Choosing 'Yes, it folds into a cube' ignores that a cube needs 6 faces, not 5. Choosing 'No, it has one square too many' miscounts in the wrong direction — 5 is one too FEW, not one too many. Choosing 'Yes, but only if two squares overlap' is not a valid net: a net's faces must not overlap when folded.
6. (a) Wrong: multiply by angle ÷ 360, not divide by it. — The arc length is the fraction angle ÷ 360 of the circumference, and that fraction is MULTIPLIED by the circumference — it is never divided by the angle itself. So Priya's method, dividing by the angle, is wrong, and the correct statement names both the fraction and the multiplication. Saying she is correct accepts her wrong division. Saying the arc length is the full circumference multiplied by the angle in degrees, with no division at all, drops the 360 that turns the angle into a fraction. Saying the arc length is the radius multiplied by the angle in degrees swaps the circumference for the radius, which is a different and, in degrees, incorrect formula.
7. (a) 2978 — A rise of 6% is a multiplier of 1.06, applied once for each year. After year 1: 2500 × 1.06 = 2650. After year 2: 2650 × 1.06 = 2809. After year 3: 2809 × 1.06 = 2977.54, which is 2978 to the nearest whole number. Multiplying by 1.18 in one go would be wrong, because the second and third years grow from larger numbers than the first.
8. (a) 10/7 — Put Saturday's distance over Sunday's distance: 17.5/12.25. Multiply both numbers by 100 to clear the decimals: 1750/1225. Divide both by their highest common factor, 175: 1750÷175 = 10, 1225÷175 = 7, giving 10/7. (7/10 comes from writing the distances the wrong way round. 3/7 comes from finding the difference, 17.5 − 12.25 = 5.25 km, and writing it as a fraction of Sunday's distance, 5.25/12.25. 10/17 comes from comparing Saturday's distance to the total distance ridden, 17.5/29.75.)
9. (a) 11.5 ≤ L < 12.5 — Rounding to the nearest centimetre means L can be up to half a centimetre below or above 12 before it would round to a different whole number. Half of 1 cm is 0.5 cm, so the lower bound is 12 − 0.5 = 11.5 and the upper bound is 12 + 0.5 = 12.5. A value exactly at the upper bound, 12.5, would round up to 13, not 12, so 12.5 itself is excluded, giving 11.5 ≤ L < 12.5. Writing 11.5 ≤ L ≤ 12.5 wrongly includes 12.5 on both ends. Writing 11 ≤ L < 13 uses a whole centimetre either side instead of half a centimetre. Writing 11.5 < L < 12.5 wrongly excludes the lower bound, which is a value that does round to 12.
10. (d) −2 — Method: place the two end values on a number line and list the integers that sit strictly between them. Working: reading from left to right the integers run −4, −3, −2, −1, so the values strictly between the ends are −3 and −2. Only one of those is offered. Answer: −2. The distractors: −5 comes from ordering negatives by the size of their digits, which wrongly places −5 to the right of −4; 0 comes from carrying on past −1 instead of stopping at it; 2 comes from ignoring the minus signs and choosing a number between 1 and 4.
11. (c) 3 hours — Time = distance ÷ speed, so 210 ÷ 70 = 3 hours. Working out 210 − 70 = 140 subtracts the speed from the distance instead of dividing. Working out 210 + 70 = 280 adds the two values together, which does not give a time. Working out 210 × 70 = 14700 multiplies distance and speed together instead of dividing. The journey takes 3 hours.
12. (b) Priya — The larger the number of trials, the closer a relative frequency tends to be to the true probability. Priya made 200 drops, more than Freya's 20, Malik's 50 or Tom's 80, so her relative frequency gives the best estimate. Freya's estimate is based on only 20 drops, the smallest sample, so it is the least reliable of the four. Malik's 50 drops and Tom's 80 drops are both larger than Freya's but still well short of Priya's 200.