⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 21 — Method: find the gap between neighbouring terms, then add one gap to the last term that is known. Working: 9 − 5 = 4, 13 − 9 = 4 and 17 − 13 = 4, so 4 is added each time; the 5th term is one step on from the 4th term, so it is 17 + 4. Answer: 21. The distractors: 25 comes from adding the 4 twice and landing on the 6th term; 20 comes from multiplying the position by the common difference, 5 × 4, and ignoring the fact that the sequence starts at 5 rather than at 4; 22 comes from adding the first term, 5, to 17 instead of adding the common difference.
2. (c) x = 8 — The turning point lies exactly halfway between the two roots. If the other root is r, the midpoint of −2 and r must be 3, so (−2 + r) ÷ 2 = 3, giving r = 8. Choosing x = 5 comes from adding 2 and 3 rather than using the midpoint relationship correctly. Choosing x = 1 comes from subtracting 2 from 3 instead of reflecting −2 across the turning point. Choosing x = −8 finds the right distance but then reflects in the y-axis instead of in the line of symmetry x = 3, so the sign of the answer is flipped.
3. (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
4. (b) 100 — The sample shows a proportion of 8/60 = 2/15 faulty. Apply that proportion to the new batch of 750: 750 × 2/15 = 100. Flipping the ratio, calculating 8/750 × 60 instead of 8/60 × 750, gives 0.64, which rounds to about 1. Assuming the same number of faulty items applies to the new batch, without scaling for its larger size, just repeats the sample's count of 8. Rounding the proportion 8/60 = 0.1333... down to 0.1 before multiplying gives 750 × 0.1 = 75.
5. (a) 4 — Method: for inverse proportion, x × y always stays the same value. Working: when x = 5 and y = 8, the constant is 5 × 8 = 40. When x = 10, y = 40 ÷ 10 = 4. So y = 4. Distractor 16 comes from treating the relationship as direct proportion instead of inverse, working out 8 × 10 ÷ 5. Distractor 3 comes from assuming y decreases by the same amount that x increases, an additive rather than proportional idea. Distractor 0.8 comes from dividing the given y-value, 8, by the new x-value, 10, without first finding the constant.
6. (c) 1/3 — Method: find non-fiction's fraction of the whole, then multiply by the fraction of non-fiction that is history. Working: total parts = 4 + 5 = 9, so non-fiction is 5/9 of all books. History books are 3/5 of the non-fiction books: 3/5 × 5/9 = 15/45 = 1/3. Answer: 1/3. 3/5 comes from giving the fraction of non-fiction books that are history, without relating it to all the books at the fair. 5/9 comes from stopping after finding the fraction of all books that are non-fiction, without finding the history books within that. 4/15 comes from multiplying 3/5 by the fraction that is fiction (4/9) instead of the fraction that is non-fiction (5/9).
7. (b) 28 — The width of the rectangle is the difference in x-coordinates, 9 − 2 = 7, and the height is the difference in y-coordinates, 5 − 1 = 4. The area is width × height = 7 × 4 = 28. 22 comes from using the perimeter formula, 2 × (7 + 4), instead of the area formula. 35 comes from multiplying 7 by 5 instead of 4, misreading one of the y-coordinates. 63 comes from multiplying 9 by 7, using an x-coordinate instead of the height.
8. (b) £1.57 — Slice area = (90 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 10² = 0.25 × 314 = 78.5 cm². Cost = 78.5 × £0.02 = £1.57. (£0.16 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.25 × 3.14 × 10 for the area; £6.28 comes from finding the area of the whole cake and forgetting the angle fraction; £0.31 comes from using the arc length formula instead of the sector area formula.)
9. (d) (−2, 6) — Method: add the top numbers of both vectors to the starting x-coordinate, and the bottom numbers of both vectors to the starting y-coordinate. Working: x-coordinate 2 + 3 + (−7) = −2; y-coordinate −1 + 5 + 2 = 6. Answer: (−2, 6). A candidate who only applies vector u and forgets v gets (5, 4). A candidate who only applies vector v and forgets u gets (−5, 1). A candidate who works out the combined vector u + v but forgets to add it to the starting point gets (−4, 7).
10. (a) 1,400 and 1,240, so combine the samples for one estimate — Method: scale each sample up to the whole stock, then use the fact that a larger sample gives a more reliable estimate than a smaller one. Working: the first sample gives 35 ÷ 50 = 0.7 and 0.7 × 2,000 = 1,400 paperbacks; the second gives 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62 and 0.62 × 2,000 = 1,240 paperbacks. Two random samples of the same size are expected to differ a little, so neither estimate is wrong. Putting the two together gives 35 + 31 = 66 paperbacks in 100 books, and 66 ÷ 100 = 0.66 with 0.66 × 2,000 = 1,320, an estimate resting on twice as many books as either volunteer checked. Answer: 1,400 and 1,240, so combine the samples for one estimate. The distractors: keeping 1,400 because it is larger picks an estimate by its size, when both samples held 50 books and neither has a stronger claim; saying a volunteer must have miscounted assumes two random samples ought to agree exactly, which is precisely what random sampling does not promise; 1,750 and 1,550 come from 35 × 50 = 1,750 and 31 × 50 = 1,550, multiplying each count by the size of the sample instead of scaling by 2,000 ÷ 50.
11. (c) 21.6 — m² = (−2.4)² = 5.76, since a negative number squared is positive, so 5m² = 28.8. Then 3m = 3 × (−2.4) = −7.2. Total: 28.8 + (−7.2) = 21.6. −36 comes from taking m² as negative, 5 × (−5.76) − 7.2 = −36, forgetting that squaring removes the negative sign. 36 comes from ignoring the negative sign on m altogether and using m = 2.4 throughout. 29.4 comes from treating 3m as 3 + m instead of 3 × m, giving 28.8 + (3 + (−2.4)).
12. (b) s = d / t — Method: undo the multiplication by t by dividing both sides by t. Working: d = st, so dividing both sides by t gives s = d / t. The value s = dt comes from multiplying by t instead of dividing. The value s = t / d comes from inverting the fraction, dividing t by d instead of d by t. The value s = d − t comes from subtracting t instead of dividing by it.