⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 1 : 3 — Write the two lengths as a ratio: 5 : 15. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 5, to give 1 : 3. Writing 3 : 1 swaps the order, comparing B to A instead of A to B. Leaving the ratio as 5 : 15 has not been simplified. Finding 1 : 2 comes from comparing the smaller length to the gap between the two lengths (15 − 5 = 10, then wrongly simplifying 5 : 10), not from comparing the two lengths themselves.
2. (a) 1/6 — Method: write the results of the two dice as ordered pairs, count the pairs whose scores add to the total asked for, divide by the number of ordered pairs there are, then cancel the fraction down. Working: there are 6 × 6 = 36 equally likely ordered pairs. The pairs whose scores add to 7 are (1, 6), (2, 5), (3, 4), (4, 3), (5, 2) and (6, 1), which is 6 pairs, so the probability is 6/36. Dividing the top and the bottom by 6 gives 1/6. Answer: the probability is 1/6. The distractors: 7/36 comes from taking the number of favourable pairs to be 7 because 7 is the total asked for, confusing the size of a total with the number of ways of making it; 1/7 comes from using the 21 different combinations of two scores as the equally likely results, finding the 3 combinations 1 and 6, 2 and 5, 3 and 4, and cancelling 3/21; 6/11 comes from counting the 6 favourable pairs correctly but dividing by the 11 possible totals from 2 to 12 rather than by the 36 pairs.
3. (c) 18 — 45 ÷ 5 = 9, and 2 × 9 = 18. A candidate who stops after finding one fifth gets 9. A candidate who uses 3/5 instead of 2/5 gets 27. A candidate who uses 4/5 instead of 2/5 gets 36.
4. (d) No, the range uses only the fastest and slowest time — Method: check what the range is built from, then look at what it leaves out. Working: both teams have a fastest time of 20 seconds and a slowest of 40 seconds, so both ranges are 40 − 20 = 20 seconds and Tomás has that part right. But the range is calculated from those two values alone. Six of Team A's seven times lie between 20 and 25 seconds, with a single time far out at 40; Team B is the other way round, with six of its seven times at 30 seconds or more and a single time far out at 20. So Team A bunches at the fast end and Team B at the slow end. The two patterns are quite different, and the range cannot see the difference because the five middle times never enter the calculation. Answer: no, because the range uses only the fastest and slowest time. The distractors: comparing the means answers a different question, since a mean measures position rather than spread, and two sets with the same spread can have different means; saying that equal ranges mean equal spread is the very assumption that fails here; saying that seven times each forces the spreads to match confuses the size of a data set with how its values are arranged inside it.
5. (b) (2, 6) — To add column vectors, add the top numbers together and add the bottom numbers together, separately: top = 3 + (−1) = 2, bottom = 2 + 4 = 6, giving (2, 6). A candidate who writes the top and bottom numbers of the correct answer in the wrong order gives (6, 2). A candidate who subtracts instead of adds, working out 3 − (−1) = 4 and 2 − 4 = −2, gives (4, −2). A candidate who adds the top numbers correctly but subtracts the bottom numbers by mistake, working out 2 − 4 = −2, gives (2, −2). The correct answer is (2, 6).
6. (b) 32 km — Method: work out the scale factor connecting the two mile values: 20 miles is 4 times 5 miles (20 ÷ 5 = 4), so multiply the km value by 4 too: 8 × 4 = 32 km. Distractor origins: 24 km comes from subtracting the mile values (20 − 5 = 15), dividing by 5 to get a wrong scale factor of 3, then multiplying 8 × 3; 23 km comes from adding the difference in miles, 15, directly to the km value, 8; 16 km comes from using a scale factor of 2, doubling the km value once instead of scaling by the correct factor of 4.
7. (d) 4:1 — Write the ratio online : in-store using the numbers in the question: 180 : 45. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 45, to give 4 : 1. (1:4 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, in-store : online. 3:1 comes from subtracting the in-store orders from the online orders, 180 − 45 = 135, and comparing that to the in-store orders, 135:45, instead of dividing. 4:5 comes from comparing the online orders to the total number of orders, 180:225.)
8. (b) One turning point. — Every quadratic graph, one with an x² term and no higher power of x, has exactly one turning point, since it is a single U-shaped or n-shaped curve. Saying two turning points describes a cubic graph, which can rise, turn, then turn again. Saying no turning points describes a straight line, which has none. Saying four turning points greatly overestimates how many times a simple quadratic curve changes direction — that would need a much higher power of x.
9. (c) $\binom{2}{7}$ — First find the character's position after the first move: (−5 + 6, 2 + (−9)) = (1, −7). The second move takes it from (1, −7) to (3, 0), so subtract the current position from the target: (3 − 1, 0 − (−7)) = $\binom{2}{7}$. $\binom{8}{−2}$ works from the starting point (−5, 2) and ignores the first move — (3 − (−5), 0 − 2) = $\binom{8}{−2}$. $\binom{−2}{−7}$ subtracts the wrong way round, current position minus target, instead of target minus current position — (1 − 3, −7 − 0) = $\binom{−2}{−7}$. $\binom{4}{−7}$ adds the target's coordinates to the current position instead of subtracting — (1 + 3, −7 + 0) = $\binom{4}{−7}$.
10. (b) 4 — With 150 rolls and probability 1/6 for each number, the expected count is 150 ÷ 6 = 25. Comparing each actual count with 25: 1 is 22 (3 below), 2 is 27 (2 above), 3 is 24 (1 below), 4 is 34 (9 above), 5 is 21 (4 below) and 6 is 22 (3 below). Number 4 is furthest above its expected count, so it is the most over-represented. Number 2 is also above its expected count, but by only 2, far less than 4's 9. Number 3's count of 24 is below the expected 25, so it is under-represented, not over. Number 6's count of 22 is also below the expected 25, so it too is under-represented.
11. (d) 1 — Method: any non-zero number raised to the power zero has the same value, which follows from dividing a power by itself. Working: 3² ÷ 3² subtracts the indices to give 3⁰, and the same division worked out directly is 9 ÷ 9 = 1, so 3⁰ = 1. Answer: 1. The distractors: 0 comes from reading the index as the value of the whole expression; 3 comes from treating a zero index as leaving the base unchanged; 1/3 comes from confusing a zero index with a negative index and taking the reciprocal of 3.
12. (d) 50 g — Method: the milk is 4 parts of the ratio, so use the milk to find the value of one part, then read off the chocolate, which is 1 part. Working: one part = 200 ÷ 4 = 50, and the chocolate is one part. Answer: 50 g. The distractors: 40 g comes from treating the 200 g as the total mass of the mixture and splitting it into 1 + 4 = 5 parts; 250 g is the total mass of the finished mixture, the 200 g of milk plus the chocolate, rather than the chocolate on its own; 800 g comes from multiplying 200 by 4 instead of dividing, which scales the milk up rather than down to the chocolate.