⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) £96.90 — Method: multiply the number of units by the cost per unit, then convert the result from pence to pounds. Working: 340 × 28.5p = 9690p; converting to pounds, 9690p ÷ 100 = £96.90. Answer: £96.90. £969.00 comes from misplacing the decimal point when converting pence to pounds, dividing by 10 instead of 100. £9.69 comes from misplacing the decimal point the other way, dividing by 1000 instead of 100. £102.00 comes from rounding the rate to 30p per unit before multiplying.
2. (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
3. (a) 5 — The symbol ≤ means n can equal 5 or any number less than 5, so 5 is included and is the largest integer value. A candidate who treats the inequality as strict, as if it were n < 5, answers 4. A candidate who confuses ≤ with ≥ and looks for a value just above the boundary answers 6. A candidate who makes a sign error and reads the inequality as n ≤ −5 answers −5.
4. (b) 15 pupils — The frequencies are 5, 4, 3 and 3 pupils, and 5 + 4 + 3 + 3 = 15, so there are 15 pupils in the class. Choosing 6 pupils comes from adding the numbers of pets, 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, instead of the frequencies. Choosing 10 pupils comes from leaving out the '0 pets' row: 4 + 3 + 3 = 10. Choosing 18 pupils comes from counting the '3 pets' row twice: 5 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 18.
5. (d) 5x² — 5x² is a single term: a product of a number and a power of a letter, with no + or − sign attached to anything else. A candidate who picks 5x² + 3x is choosing the expression that contains that term, rather than the term on its own. A candidate who picks 5x² = 20 is drawn in by the equals sign and misses that this makes it an equation. A candidate who picks A = 5x² thinks any statement with a letter and a number combined must be a formula.
6. (d) 135 m² — Method: for area, the scale factor must be squared. Working: area scale = 300² = 90 000. 15 × 90 000 = 1,350,000 cm². Convert to m² by dividing by 10 000: 1,350,000 ÷ 10 000 = 135 m². Wrong options: 0.45 m² comes from using the linear scale factor (×300) instead of squaring it; 1,350,000 m² comes from forgetting to convert the answer from cm² to m²; 13,500 m² comes from dividing by 100 instead of 10 000 when converting units.
7. (b) On average a plant grew 1.5 cm taller for each extra day — Method: in the equation of a line, the number multiplying x is the gradient, and a gradient states the change in y produced by an increase of 1 in x, read in the units of the two axes. Working: here x is measured in days and y in centimetres, so the gradient 1.5 carries the units centimetres per day. Testing it on the line, 5 days gives 1.5 × 5 + 4 = 11.5 cm and 6 days gives 1.5 × 6 + 4 = 13 cm, a rise of 1.5 cm for the one extra day. Answer: on average a plant grew 1.5 cm taller for each extra day of watering. The distractors: 1.5 cm as the height before any watering is the value of y when x is 0, which is the other number in the equation, 4 cm, so this swaps the gradient and the intercept; 1.5 cm as the gap between the tallest and the shortest plant reads the gradient as a range, when a range is a difference between two of the 16 plants and a gradient is a rate; 1.5 days for each extra centimetre inverts the rate, dividing days by centimetres instead of centimetres by days, and the line gives 1 cm of growth in two thirds of a day.
8. (c) 1 : 3 — n : P = 15 : 45. Dividing both parts by their highest common factor, 15, gives 1 : 3. Inverting the ratio, 3 : 1, swaps profit and number of items. Dividing only the n-part by 15, getting 1, but leaving the P-part as 45 gives 1 : 45 — only one side has been simplified. Dividing only the P-part by 15, getting 3, but leaving the n-part as 15 gives 15 : 3, the opposite partial mistake.
9. (b) £33.60 — The area of the parallelogram flower bed is base × height = 3.5 × 2 = 7 m². The cost is 7 × £4.80 = £33.60. £16.80 comes from using the triangle formula instead of the parallelogram formula: 3.5 × 2 = 7, and half of 7 is 3.5 m², then 3.5 × £4.80 = £16.80. £26.40 comes from adding the base and height, 3.5+2 = 5.5, instead of multiplying them, then multiplying by £4.80. £7.00 correctly finds the area, 7 m², but forgets to multiply it by the cost per m².
10. (b) Cuboid — not necessarily a cube — A solid with 6 faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices in which every face is a rectangle is a cuboid, but nothing here confirms that all the edges are the same length, so the box could be a cube or a non-cube cuboid; the most that can be concluded is that it is a cuboid, making 'Cuboid — not necessarily a cube' correct. 'Cube — only a cube fits this' is wrong because a cube is just one particular cuboid; a general cuboid with different length, width and height has exactly the same face, edge and vertex counts and rectangular faces. 'Triangular prism' is wrong because a triangular prism has 5 faces, 9 edges and 6 vertices, and two of its faces are triangles, so it matches neither the counts nor the face shape. 'Not enough information' is wrong because rectangular faces with these counts do pin the solid down to the cuboid family, even though they cannot pin down a cube specifically.
11. (a) 15 km/h — Speed = distance ÷ time, so 45 ÷ 3 = 15 km/h. Working out 45 × 3 = 135 multiplies distance and time together instead of dividing. Working out 45 + 3 = 48 and 45 − 3 = 42 both combine the two values by addition or subtraction, which does not give a speed at all. The cyclist's average speed is 15 km/h.
12. (b) 0.225 — The relative frequency of rain is the number of rainy days out of all days recorded: 9 ÷ 40 = 0.225, which is noticeably less than the forecaster's claimed 0.3. Using the number of dry days, 40 − 9 = 31, as the denominator instead of the total of 40 gives 9 ÷ 31 = 0.29 (2 d.p.). Simply reporting the forecaster's claimed value, 0.3, without calculating anything from the data at all, ignores the recorded results completely. Misplacing the decimal point, treating 9 out of 40 as 9%, gives 0.09 instead of 0.225.