⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 23 — Division undoes multiplication, so the missing number is 391 ÷ 17 = 23. Writing down 17 repeats the number already given instead of solving for the missing one. Subtracting instead of dividing gives 391 − 17 = 374. Multiplying instead of dividing gives 391 × 17 = 6647.
2. (a) Square-based pyramid — A solid with one square base and four triangular faces meeting at a single apex above the base is a square-based pyramid. A triangular prism has two triangular faces and three rectangular faces, not a square base with four triangles, so that is a different solid. A cube has six square faces, and a cuboid has six rectangular faces — neither has any triangular faces at all. The solid described is a square-based pyramid.
3. (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
4. (c) 9.9 cm — Method: the 7 cm side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is wanted, so use sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse and rearrange it for the hypotenuse. Working: sin 45° = 7 ÷ h, so h = 7 ÷ sin 45° = 9.899…, which is 9.9 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 9.9 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from multiplying by sin 45° instead of dividing by it; 14.0 cm comes from doubling the 7 cm side, which is the rule for a side opposite 30° and not one opposite 45°; 7.0 cm comes from reading the two equal sides of a 45° right-angled triangle as including the hypotenuse, when the equal pair is the two shorter sides.
5. (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
6. (d) 3400 — Combining all three greenhouses gives 200 + 150 + 250 = 600 seeds planted in total, and 172 + 126 + 212 = 510 germinated, so the combined estimate of the germination probability is 510/600 = 0.85. Out of a new batch of 4000 seeds, the expected number to germinate is 4000 × 0.85 = 3400. Writing 3440 is wrong because it uses only Greenhouse 1's rate, 172/200 = 0.86, instead of the combined rate from all three: 4000 × 0.86 = 3440. Writing 3360 is wrong because it uses only Greenhouse 2's rate, 126/150 = 0.84: 4000 × 0.84 = 3360. Writing 510 is wrong because that is the total number that germinated in the ORIGINAL trial, not scaled up to the new batch of 4000 seeds at all. The best estimate is 3400 seeds.
7. (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
8. (d) 5x ≤ 30 — Method: write the total cost as the cost of one book times the number of books, then turn the limit into an inequality sign; 'at most' allows the limit to be reached but not passed. Working: x books at £5 each cost 5x pounds; that total must not go above £30, and spending exactly £30 is allowed, so the two sides are joined by ≤ and the inequality is 5x ≤ 30. Answer: 5x ≤ 30. The distractors: 5x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition; x + 5 ≤ 30 comes from adding the price of a book to the number of books instead of multiplying; 5x < 30 comes from reading 'at most £30' as 'less than £30', which wrongly rules out spending the whole £30.
9. (c) 27 days — The campaign starts at d = 3 and ends at d = 30, so it runs for 30 − 3 = 27 days. Getting 33 days comes from adding the two values, 3 + 30 = 33, instead of subtracting them. Getting 30 days uses only the end day and ignores that the campaign did not start at day 0. Getting 24 days comes from subtracting the start day twice, 30 − 3 − 3 = 24, instead of once.
10. (b) 12.5 — Method: apply the term-to-term rule to the term just written, and keep the exact value even when halving does not give a whole number. Working: the term before the one wanted is 25, and halving it means working out 25 ÷ 2, which is 12 with 1 left over to share, giving a half. Answer: 12.5. The distractors: 12 comes from halving 25 and then cutting the result down to a whole number; 0 comes from treating the sequence as one with a constant difference and taking 25 away from 25; 6.25 comes from halving twice and giving the term after the next one.
11. (b) £13,860 — Method: apply the first year's percentage decrease, then apply the second year's percentage decrease to the new value. Working: after the first year, the car is worth £17,500 × 0.88. Multiplying this result by 0.90 gives the value at the end of the second year, £13,860. Answer: £13,860. £13,650 comes from adding the two percentages together (12% + 10% = 22%) and applying a single 22% decrease, £17,500 × 0.78 = £13,650, instead of applying the decreases one after the other. £15,750 comes from applying only the second year's 10% decrease to the original price, forgetting the first year's decrease entirely, £17,500 × 0.90 = £15,750. £15,400 comes from applying only the first year's 12% decrease and stopping there, forgetting to apply the second year's decrease at all.
12. (c) 1 : 300 — First convert both lengths to the same unit: 15 m = 1500 cm. The scale compares 5 cm on the drawing to 1500 cm in real life, so dividing both parts by 5 gives a scale of 1 : 300. A candidate who compares 5 to 15 without converting units gets 1 : 3. A candidate who converts 15 m to 150 cm, using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 30. A candidate who converts 15 m to 15000 cm, again using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 3000. The scale of the drawing is 1 : 300.