⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 2.00 kg — Convert the tin's mass to kilograms first: 650 g = 0.65 kg. Adding this to the bag's mass gives 0.65 + 1.35 = 2.00 kg. Converting 650 g to kilograms by dividing by 100 instead of 1000 gives 6.5 kg, and adding this to 1.35 kg gives 7.85 kg. Adding the two masses without converting grams to kilograms at all — treating 650 as if it were already measured in kilograms — gives 651.35 kg. Subtracting the tin's mass from the bag's mass instead of adding the two together, 1.35 − 0.65, gives 0.70 kg.
2. (d) 4 — Method: compare the equation with the general form y = mx + c after writing the x term first, then read off the coefficient of x. Working: y = 6 + 4x can be written as y = 4x + 6, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = 4. Answer: the gradient is 4. The value 6 comes from reading off the constant, written first in the equation, and treating it as the gradient because it comes before the x term. The value 10 comes from adding the two numbers in the equation, 6 + 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x. The value 24 comes from multiplying the two numbers in the equation, 6 × 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x.
3. (c) 120 — 27 of the 45 sweets are orange (45 − 18 = 27), so the probability of taking an orange sweet is 27/45 = 3/5, and 200 × 3/5 = 120. Writing 80 is wrong because 200 × 18/45 = 80 uses the LEMON sweets' fraction instead of orange. Writing 182 is wrong because it takes the 18 lemon sweets away from the 200 repeats (200 − 18 = 182), applying the ‘the rest are orange’ subtraction to the number of goes instead of to the 45 sweets in the bag. Writing 27 is wrong because it is simply the number of orange sweets in the bag — it has not been scaled up to account for the 200 repeats. The expected number of times an orange sweet is taken is 120.
4. (b) 7 — Method: trap the number between the two square numbers on either side of it, then decide which of them it is nearer to. Working: 6² = 36 and 7² = 49, so √45 lies between 6 and 7; 49 − 45 = 4 while 45 − 36 = 9, so 45 is nearer to 49. Answer: 7. The distractors: 6 comes from taking the square number below 45 and stopping there, without checking which of 36 and 49 is nearer; 22.5 comes from halving 45 instead of looking for the number that multiplies by itself to give 45; 2,025 comes from squaring 45 instead of taking its square root.
5. (d) The mode, because colours cannot be added or ordered — Method: an average can only be used on data that supports the operation it needs. A mean needs the values to be added and divided, a median needs them to be placed in order, and a range needs one value to be taken away from another; a mode needs only counting, so it is the average available when the data are categories rather than numbers. Working: the data collected here are colours, silver, black, blue and red. The numbers 74, 52, 40 and 34 count the cars of each colour, they do not measure them, and 74 + 52 + 40 + 34 = 200 simply returns the size of the survey. No colour can be added to another, and there is no order that puts blue before red, so of the four averages only the one found by counting survives. Answer: the mode, because colours cannot be added or ordered, and the mode is silver. The distractors: the mean is said to use all 200 colours, and a mean of the four frequencies, 200 ÷ 4 = 50, is a number of cars rather than a colour, so it describes nothing about a typical car; the median is said to put the colours in order, but ordering the frequencies 34, 40, 52, 74 orders the counts, not the colours, and gives 46, again a number of cars; the range is not an average at all, and 74 − 34 = 40 measures the gap between the commonest and rarest counts, which is a measure of spread.
6. (d) 5x ≤ 30 — Method: write the total cost as the cost of one book times the number of books, then turn the limit into an inequality sign; 'at most' allows the limit to be reached but not passed. Working: x books at £5 each cost 5x pounds; that total must not go above £30, and spending exactly £30 is allowed, so the two sides are joined by ≤ and the inequality is 5x ≤ 30. Answer: 5x ≤ 30. The distractors: 5x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition; x + 5 ≤ 30 comes from adding the price of a book to the number of books instead of multiplying; 5x < 30 comes from reading 'at most £30' as 'less than £30', which wrongly rules out spending the whole £30.
7. (d) $y = 2x - 1$ — Method: pick two points the line passes through, work out the gradient as vertical change ÷ horizontal change, and read the y-intercept from where the line crosses the y-axis. Working: the line passes through (0, −1) and (1, 1), so the gradient is (1 − (−1)) ÷ (1 − 0) = 2, and it crosses the y-axis at −1. Answer: y = 2x − 1. Distractor refutation: y = 2x + 1 comes from reading the y-intercept as +1 instead of −1, misreading which side of the origin the line crosses. y = x − 1 comes from taking the gradient as 1, counting the same number of squares across and up instead of checking the rise is twice the run. y = −2x − 1 comes from a sign error on the gradient, treating the line as sloping downward from left to right when it actually rises.
8. (a) 12 — Compare the powers of each prime that appears in both factorisations. In 2² × 3² and 2² × 3 × 7, the prime 2 appears with power 2 in both, and the prime 3 appears with power 2 in one and only power 1 in the other — take the lower power, 3¹. Multiplying the shared primes at their lower powers, 2² × 3, gives 12. Using power 1 for both primes instead of comparing the powers properly, 2 × 3, gives 6, which misses that 2 is common at power 2, not power 1. Multiplying the primes at their higher powers and including 7, which only appears in 84, gives 2² × 3² × 7, which comes to 252 — this is the lowest common multiple, not the highest common factor. Only spotting that 3 is a common prime and overlooking that 2 is common as well gives 3. So the highest common factor of 36 and 84 is 12.
9. (a) to the nearest centimetre — Method: the error interval of a rounded measurement runs from half a unit below the stated value to half a unit above it, so the width of the interval is one whole unit of the accuracy used. Working: the interval runs from 24.5 to 25.5, a width of 25.5 − 24.5 = 1, so the unit of accuracy is 1 cm; the stated value is the midpoint, 25 cm, and 25 correct to the nearest centimetre is exactly what gives 24.5 ≤ L < 25.5. Answer: to the nearest centimetre. To the nearest 0.5 cm comes from reading the half-unit, 0.5, as the accuracy itself instead of doubling it back to the full unit. To 1 decimal place comes from seeing the bounds written with one decimal place and taking that as the accuracy, but the bounds of a value given to 1 decimal place would be only 0.05 either side. To the nearest 10 cm comes from confusing the size of the value, about 25, with the unit it was rounded to; rounding to the nearest 10 cm would give an interval 5 cm either side of the stated value.
10. (c) 5√3 m — The cable, the pole and the ground form a right-angled triangle: the ground distance (5 m) is adjacent to the 60° angle, and the height of the pole is opposite it, so height = 5 × tan 60° = 5 × √3 = 5√3 m. 5√3/2 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of tan 60°. 5/√3 m comes from using tan 30° = 1/√3, the reciprocal-angle value, instead of tan 60°. 10√3 m comes from doubling the correct height by mistake.
11. (a) Yes, because 120 ends in 0 — Method: a whole number divides exactly by 5 when its last digit is 5 or 0, so look at the final digit. Working: the final digit of 120 is 0, so 120 is a multiple of 5; the division confirms it, since 5 × 24 = 120 with nothing left over. Answer: Yes, because 120 ends in 0. The distractors: the option that says yes because 120 is even reaches the right conclusion from the wrong test, since being even is the test for divisibility by 2, and 14 is even but is not a multiple of 5; saying no because 5 does not divide into 12 comes from ignoring the final digit and testing only the leading digits; saying no because the digits add to 3 applies the digit-sum test, which works for 3 and for 9 but not for 5.
12. (a) 2b — Method: a total cost is the price of one item multiplied by the number of items bought. Working: each pen costs £2 and there are b pens, so the total cost is 2 × b, which is written as 2b. Answer: 2b. The distractors: b + 2 comes from adding the price to the number of pens instead of multiplying, treating £2 as a one-off charge; 2b + 2 comes from multiplying correctly and then adding the £2 a second time as though there were also a fixed charge; b/2 comes from dividing by the price instead of multiplying by it.