⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 90° — A tangent to a circle always meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so the angle between the tangent and the radius at P is 90°. 180° confuses the tangent with the diameter through P, as if the radius continued in a straight line into the tangent. 45° halves the true angle by mistake. 60° comes from confusing this fact with the angle of an equilateral triangle.
2. (a) 753 — The estimate from 2000 spins is the most reliable, since it comes from the largest sample size, so the best estimate of the probability is 0.251. Over a further 3000 spins, the expected number landing on green is 3000 × 0.251 = 753. Writing 1050 is wrong because 3000 × 0.350 = 1050 uses the estimate from only 20 spins, the LEAST reliable of the three. Writing 870 is wrong because 3000 × 0.290 = 870 uses the estimate from 200 spins rather than the more reliable 2000-spin estimate. Writing 750 is wrong because 3000 × 0.25 = 750 ignores the recorded data completely and simply assumes each of the 4 colours is equally likely. The best estimate is 753 expected green spins.
3. (a) 40 m² — A scale of 1 : 10 is a length scale factor of 10 from model to real. Areas scale with the square of the length scale factor: 10² = 100. 0.4 × 100 = 40, so the real staircase covers 40 m². Giving 4 m² uses the length scale factor, 10, without squaring it (0.4 × 10 = 4). Giving 0.04 m² divides by the scale factor instead of multiplying by its square (0.4 ÷ 10 = 0.04). Giving 400 m² cubes the scale factor, 10³ = 1000, as if area scaled like a volume (0.4 × 1000 = 400).
4. (c) £338.69 — To increase by 12% each year, multiply by 1.12 twice. £270 × 1.12 × 1.12 = £338.688, which rounds to £338.69 (nearest penny, since the third decimal place is 8). £334.80 comes from treating the two 12% increases as a single flat 24% increase applied once instead of compounding: £270 × 1.24 = £334.80. £302.40 comes from applying the 12% increase only once, for 1 year instead of 2: £270 × 1.12 = £302.40. £338.68 comes from rounding £338.688 down to the nearest penny instead of up.
5. (a) 4/15 — Method: first find how many pupils travel only by car, then write that as a fraction of the 60 pupils surveyed. Working: pupils who walk or cycle or both = 32 + 24 − 12 = 44. Only by car = 60 − 44 = 16. P(only by car) = 16/60 = 4/15. Answer: 4/15. Watch out: writing down 1/5 takes the overlap of 12 pupils on its own, 12/60, mistaking the group who do both for the group who travel only by car. Writing down 4/5 comes from 60 − 12 = 48, subtracting only the overlap from the total instead of the whole walk-or-cycle count, so cyclists and walkers who are not in the overlap are wrongly swept into the only-car group. And writing down 7/15 comes from 60 − 32 = 28, subtracting the walkers alone and forgetting the cyclists altogether.
6. (a) 1 — Method: the value of y when x = 0 is where the line meets the y-axis, which is the constant c in y = mx + c, so the gradient is worked out from the two given points first and the constant follows by substituting one of them. Working: m = (16 − 7) ÷ (5 − 2) = 9 ÷ 3 = 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 2 and y = 7 gives 7 = 3 × 2 + c, so c = 7 − 6 = 1, and the value of y when x = 0 is that constant. Answer: 1. The distractors: 3 comes from stopping at the gradient and offering it as the intercept; 4 comes from stepping back from x = 2 to x = 0 by one unit of x instead of two, 7 − 3 = 4; −1 comes from working the constant out as mx − y, 3 × 2 − 7 = −1, instead of y − mx.
7. (c) 3/7 — Method: every counter is equally likely to be taken, so write the number of red counters over the total number of counters in the bag. Working: the bag holds 3 + 2 + 2 = 7 counters, of which 3 are red. Answer: 3/7, a value between 0 and 1 and just below the middle of the scale. The distractors: 4/7 comes from giving the probability that the counter is not red, counting the 2 blue and 2 green instead; 2/7 comes from counting one of the other colours by mistake and giving 2 counters over the total; 3/4 comes from writing the 3 red counters over the 4 counters that are not red instead of over all 7 counters.
8. (b) 80 — Method: the difference between 40% and 25% of the number is 15% of the number, and that difference is 12. Working: 15% of the number is 12, so 1% of the number is 12 ÷ 15 = 0.8, and the number is 0.8 × 100 = 80. Check: 40% of 80 is 32, 25% of 80 is 20, and 32 − 20 = 12. Answer: 80. The distractors: 30 comes from solving 40% of the number = 12; 48 comes from solving 25% of the number = 12; 15 is the percentage difference written as the answer.
9. (c) ASA — Method: check which condition matches two angles and the side between them, since that is all the sailmaker has measured. Working: the 10 m side lies between the 50° and 75° angles in both panels, so this is two Angles and the included Side, ASA. Options: SAS would need two sides and the angle between them, but only one side has been measured here; SSS would need three sides, but only one is known; RHS needs a right angle and a hypotenuse, and neither panel has a stated right angle. Answer: ASA.
10. (b) 6 — 3n + 4.5 = 22.5, so 3n = 18 and n = 6. A candidate who divides 22.5 by 3 first and ignores the 4.5 gets n = 7.5. A candidate who makes a sign error and forms the equation 3n − 4.5 = 22.5 gets 3n = 27 and n = 9. A candidate who divides by 3 before subtracting the 4.5, working out 22.5 ÷ 3 + 4.5, gets n = 12.
11. (b) 115° — Angle APE and angle BPQ are vertically opposite, so angle BPQ = 65°, equal to angle APE. Angle BPQ and angle PQD are co-interior (allied) angles between the parallel lines, and co-interior angles always add up to 180°, so angle PQD = 180 − 65 = 115°. "65°" comes from treating co-interior angles as equal to each other, the way alternate angles are, instead of adding to 180°. "295°" comes from applying the angles-round-a-point fact (360° − 65°) directly to the original 65°, skipping the correct co-interior step. "25°" comes from misremembering co-interior angles as adding to 90° instead of 180° (90 − 65 = 25).
12. (d) (4, 8) — The other endpoint is found from 2 × midpoint − known endpoint: x = 2 × (−1) − (−6) = −2 + 6 = 4, y = 2 × 5 − 2 = 10 − 2 = 8, giving (4, 8). (−3.5, 3.5) comes from averaging the given endpoint and the midpoint as if they were the two endpoints of a segment, instead of working backwards from the midpoint. (5, 3) comes from working out (−1 − (−6), 5 − 2) instead of doubling the midpoint before subtracting. (4, 5) comes from correctly finding the x-coordinate but copying the midpoint's y-coordinate of 5 instead of doubling it.