⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) Equilateral — Method: triangles are named by their sides — three equal sides, exactly two equal sides, or no equal sides — or by their angles. Working: the triangle described has three equal sides, which is the equilateral case, and each of its angles is 60°. Answer: equilateral. The distractors: isosceles is the name for a triangle with exactly two equal sides, and is chosen by candidates who remember only that it is the 'equal sides' word; scalene is the name for a triangle whose sides are all different, so it is the opposite of what is described; right-angled classifies a triangle by an angle of 90° rather than by its sides, and is chosen by candidates who recall that the angles of this triangle are all equal and take 'equal angles' to mean 'right angles'.
2. (a) 22p — First convert the hourly rate to pence: £13.20 = 1320p. Then convert from per hour to per minute by dividing by 60, since there are 60 minutes in an hour: 1320 ÷ 60 = 22p per minute. Working out 1320 × 60 = 79200p multiplies by 60 instead of dividing, going the wrong way between per hour and per minute. Working out 13.20 × 10 = 132p converts pounds to pence using the wrong power of ten, and dividing that by 60 carries the error through to give 2.2p. Working out 13.20 × 100 = 1320p converts the currency correctly but stops there, leaving the rate as pence per hour rather than completing the second conversion to pence per minute. The rate of pay is 22p per minute.
3. (d) 600 g — Find the flour used for one person: 240 ÷ 6 = 40 g per person. Then scale up to 15 people: 40 × 15 = 600 g. Dividing 240 by 15 and then multiplying by 6 gives 96 g — that uses the ratio the wrong way round, scaling down instead of up. Stopping at 40 g only gives the amount for one person, not for 15. Adding 15 − 6 = 9 to 240 gives 249 g, which treats the number of people and the grams of flour as if they were the same kind of quantity — proportion means scaling, not adding. The recipe needs 600 g of flour.
4. (c) 7.1 cm — Method: a shorter side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is known, so sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse gives that side directly. Working: sin 45° = x ÷ 10, so x = 10 × sin 45° = 7.071…, which is 7.1 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 7.1 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from halving the hypotenuse, which is the rule for the side opposite a 30° angle and not a 45° one; 14.1 cm comes from dividing by sin 45° instead of multiplying by it, which makes a shorter side longer than the hypotenuse; 10.0 cm comes from taking tan 45° = 1 and concluding that the shorter side matches the hypotenuse.
5. (d) £144 — Method: find the length (perimeter) scale factor by taking the square root of the area ratio, then apply it to the cost. Working: 12 : 27 simplifies to 4 : 9, and the square root of each part gives the length ratio 2 : 3, so the scale factor from the smaller to the larger pond is 3 ÷ 2 = 1.5. Cost = £96 × 1.5 = £144. Answer: £144. £216 comes from using the area ratio itself as the cost ratio, £96 × (27 ÷ 12) = £216, without taking the square root. £64 comes from using the length ratio the wrong way round, £96 × (2 ÷ 3) = £64. £111 comes from simply adding the difference in area, 27 − 12 = 15, onto the original cost, £96 + £15 = £111, instead of scaling proportionally.
6. (b) 3 + 2m — Method: add the fixed fee to the cost of the miles travelled. Working: the miles cost 2 × m = 2m pounds, and the fixed fee is £3, so the total is 3 + 2m. Answer: 3 + 2m. 2 + 3m comes from swapping which number is the fixed fee and which is the per-mile rate. 5 + m comes from adding the fixed fee and the rate together into one number, 3 + 2 = 5, before adding the miles, instead of multiplying the rate by the number of miles. 5m comes from multiplying that combined total by the miles, treating the whole £5 as if it were a per-mile rate.
7. (a) (−1, 1) — Translating by $\binom{−2}{3}$ subtracts 2 from every x-coordinate and adds 3 to every y-coordinate. This gives image vertices (−1, 4), (3, 4), (3, 7) and (−1, 7). The point (−1, 1) is not one of these: it has the correct new x-coordinate (1 − 2 = −1) but keeps the original y-coordinate (1) instead of adding 3, as if only the horizontal part of the vector had been applied.
8. (a) 12 — Compare the powers of each prime that appears in both factorisations. In 2² × 3² and 2² × 3 × 7, the prime 2 appears with power 2 in both, and the prime 3 appears with power 2 in one and only power 1 in the other — take the lower power, 3¹. Multiplying the shared primes at their lower powers, 2² × 3, gives 12. Using power 1 for both primes instead of comparing the powers properly, 2 × 3, gives 6, which misses that 2 is common at power 2, not power 1. Multiplying the primes at their higher powers and including 7, which only appears in 84, gives 2² × 3² × 7, which comes to 252 — this is the lowest common multiple, not the highest common factor. Only spotting that 3 is a common prime and overlooking that 2 is common as well gives 3. So the highest common factor of 36 and 84 is 12.
9. (d) 1/8 — Method: a run of flips of a fair coin gives equally likely sequences of heads and tails, so count the sequences that match and divide by how many sequences there are. Working: each flip lands two ways and no flip affects another, so three flips give 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 equally likely sequences: HHH, HHT, HTH, HTT, THH, THT, TTH and TTT. Only HHH has a head at every flip, so 1 sequence of the 8 matches. Answer: the probability is 1/8. The distractors: 1/4 comes from treating 'three heads', 'two heads', 'one head' and 'no heads' as four equally likely results, which they are not, since one sequence gives three heads and three sequences give two; 1/6 comes from taking the number of sequences to be 2 + 2 + 2 = 6, adding the two ways each flip can land instead of multiplying them; 1/2 comes from reading the first flip only and giving the probability of a head on one flip, without combining it with the other two.
10. (a) 80 km/h — Average speed = total distance ÷ total time. Total distance = 45 + 75 = 120 km. Total time = 30 minutes + 1 hour = 1.5 hours. 120 ÷ 1.5 = 80 km/h. 60 km/h comes from treating the 30 minutes as a whole hour, giving a total time of 2 hours instead of 1.5 (120 ÷ 2). 82.5 km/h comes from averaging the two separate speeds (45 ÷ 0.5 = 90 km/h and 75 ÷ 1 = 75 km/h, then (90 + 75) ÷ 2) instead of using total distance over total time. 75 km/h comes from using only the second part of the journey (75 km in 1 hour) and ignoring the first part.
11. (d) 1.2 × 10⁵ — 4 × 3 = 12, and 3 + 1 = 4, giving 12 × 10⁴ — but 12 is not between 1 and 10, so this must be rewritten as 1.2 × 10⁵. Stopping at 12 × 10⁴ without rewriting it leaves the coefficient out of range. Rewriting 12 as 1.2 but leaving the exponent at 4 instead of increasing it to 5 gives 1.2 × 10⁴, which is ten times too small. Adding the coefficients instead of multiplying them gives 4 + 3 = 7, so 7 × 10⁴.
12. (c) 11.0 cm — Arc length = (angle ÷ 360) × 2 × π × r = (90 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 7 = 0.25 × 43.96 = 10.99 cm, which rounds to 11.0 cm. (44.0 cm comes from finding the full circumference, 2 × 3.14 × 7 = 43.96 cm, and forgetting the angle fraction; 5.5 cm comes from leaving out the factor of 2, using π × r instead of 2 × π × r, giving 0.25 × 3.14 × 7 = 5.495 cm; 22.0 cm comes from using the diameter, 14 cm, in place of the radius, giving 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 14 = 21.98 cm.)