⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) 7 cm — Area of a parallelogram = base × height, so height = area ÷ base = 84 ÷ 12 = 7 cm. A pupil who multiplies instead of dividing gets 84 × 12 = 1008 cm. A pupil who divides the base by the area instead of the area by the base gets 12 ÷ 84 ≈ 0.14 cm. A pupil who mistakenly halves the area first, as if this were a triangle, gets (84 ÷ 2) ÷ 12 = 3.5 cm. The correct height is 7 cm.
2. (d) 10 — Method: picking 3 flowers from 5 leaves 2 flowers behind, so counting the different pairs that could be left out counts the bunches, and those pairs can be listed systematically. Working: number the flowers 1 to 5; the first flower can be left out alongside any of the 4 flowers after it, the second alongside any of the 3 after it, the third alongside any of the 2 after it and the fourth alongside the last one, so the number of pairs left out is 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 60 comes from working out 5 × 4 × 3 and treating the three picks as an ordered selection when the order does not matter; 30 comes from dividing that product by 2 instead of by the 6 orders in which three chosen flowers could have been picked; 15 comes from multiplying the 5 flowers by the 3 flowers picked instead of counting the selections.
3. (c) £7.05 — Tom is correct — Method: multiply the cost of one jar by the number of jars, then compare the total to £7. Working: 3 × £2.35 = £7.05, and since £7.05 is more than £7, Tom's claim is correct. Answer: £7.05 — Tom is correct. "£7.05 — Tom is incorrect" comes from reaching the right total but reading the 05 after the point as making the amount less than £7. "£6.95 — Tom is incorrect" comes from working out 3 × 35p as 3 × 30p + 5p = 95p, multiplying only the tens digit, and adding it to 3 × £2 = £6. "£7.20 — Tom is correct" comes from rounding £2.35 up to £2.40 before multiplying: 3 × £2.40 = £7.20.
4. (a) 0.15 — Let P(water) = x, so P(coffee) = 3x. The four outcomes are exhaustive: 0.36 + 0.04 + x + 3x = 1, so 0.4 + 4x = 1, giving 4x = 0.6 and x = 0.15. So P(water) = 0.15. Reporting 3x, the coffee probability, instead of water gives 0.45. Splitting the remaining 0.6 evenly between coffee and water, ignoring the 3:1 ratio, gives 0.30. Stopping once the remaining probability 0.6 is found, without dividing by the four equal shares, gives 0.60.
5. (b) 68° — Method: two properties are needed. Angle A and angle D are co-interior angles between the parallel sides AB and DC, so they add up to 180°; and because the trapezium is isosceles, the two angles on the side AB are equal, so angle B = angle A. Working: angle A = 180° − 112° = 68°, and angle B = angle A = 68°. Answer: 68°. The distractors: 112° comes from assuming that angles B and D are equal, which is the property of a parallelogram, not of a trapezium; 90° comes from assuming that the angles on the other parallel side must be right angles; 248° comes from using the 360° angle sum of a quadrilateral and taking away only the one angle that is given.
6. (c) An L-shape — Method: to find the front elevation, trace the outline of the solid seen from directly in front. Working: the low, wide cuboid gives a wide rectangle across the bottom, and the taller, narrower cuboid sitting on one end adds a narrower rectangle rising above only that end of the base, so the outline steps up on one side only. Answer: an L-shape. The distractors: a rectangle comes from taking the outline of the box the whole solid would just fit inside, ignoring the step created by the taller block. A T-shape comes from placing the taller block in the middle of the base instead of at one end, so that the base would show on both sides of it. A parallelogram comes from copying a face as it is drawn in the sketch — the top of the taller block is drawn as a sloping parallelogram because the solid is drawn at an angle — instead of drawing the true outline seen looking straight at the front.
7. (d) 4.7 km — Multiply the map length by the scale factor: 9.4 × 50 000 = 470 000 cm. Convert to kilometres: 470 000 cm = 4700 m = 4.7 km. Converting only to metres and calling the answer 4700 kilometres mistakes metres for kilometres. Misreading the scale as 1 : 5000 instead of 1 : 50 000, 9.4 × 5000 = 47 000 cm = 0.47 km, is ten times too small. Misplacing the decimal point in 9.4 and effectively using 94, 94 × 50 000 = 4 700 000 cm = 47 km, is ten times too big.
8. (a) the second quadrant — Method: the quadrant is settled by the signs of the two coordinates, not by their size; the quadrants are numbered anticlockwise, starting from the region where both coordinates are positive. Working: the x-coordinate −3 is negative, so the point lies to the left of the y-axis; the y-coordinate 0.5 is positive, so it lies above the x-axis; the region that is both left of the y-axis and above the x-axis is the second. Answer: the second quadrant. The distractors: 'the first quadrant' comes from ignoring the minus sign on −3; 'the third quadrant' comes from treating 0.5 as a negative value because it is smaller than 1, when in fact any number above zero is positive; 'the fourth quadrant' comes from reading the pair the wrong way round, as though the point were (0.5, −3).
9. (c) 1.2 — Add the parts of the ratio: 6 + 1 = 7. Divide the total amount by the number of parts: 8.4 ÷ 7 = 1.2 litres, which is the value of one part and also the amount of syrup, since syrup is 1 part. (7.2 litres is the amount of water, using 6 parts instead of 1. 1.4 comes from dividing 8.4 by 6 — the water's part of the ratio — instead of dividing by the total number of parts, 7. 0.84 comes from dividing 8.4 by 10 instead of by 7.)
10. (d) 15:20 — Method: add all three journey segments to the departure time, converting the total number of minutes into hours and minutes. Working: 55 + 20 + 40 = 115 minutes = 1 hour 55 minutes. 13:25 + 1 hour 55 minutes = 15:20. Answer: 15:20. (15:00 comes from leaving out the 20 minute break and adding only 55 + 40 = 95 minutes. 14:25 comes from leaving out the 55 minute first leg and adding only 20 + 40 = 60 minutes. 14:40 comes from leaving out the 40 minute second leg and adding only 55 + 20 = 75 minutes.)
11. (d) 15 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 5x gives y = 5 × 3 = 15. A candidate who adds instead of multiplying would get 5 + 3 = 8. A candidate who ignores the coefficient 5 and just copies the value of x would write y = 3. A candidate who multiplies correctly but treats x as −3 by mistake would get y = 5 × (−3) = −15.
12. (b) No — the angle given is not the included angle — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides, since SAS requires the included angle. Working: sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the angle between them is angle B — but the angle given is angle A, which is not between the two given sides, and the same mismatch happens in triangle DEF. Options: 'two sides and one angle match' restates SAS's ingredients without checking their positions, which is exactly Meera's mistake; 'SSS needs three equal sides' is a true fact about a different condition, but it is not the reason Meera is wrong here; 'SAS allows any equal angle' states a rule that is not how SAS works, since the angle must be the included one. Answer: no, the angle given is not the included angle.