⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 115° — Angle APE and angle BPQ are vertically opposite, so angle BPQ = 65°, equal to angle APE. Angle BPQ and angle PQD are co-interior (allied) angles between the parallel lines, and co-interior angles always add up to 180°, so angle PQD = 180 − 65 = 115°. "65°" comes from treating co-interior angles as equal to each other, the way alternate angles are, instead of adding to 180°. "295°" comes from applying the angles-round-a-point fact (360° − 65°) directly to the original 65°, skipping the correct co-interior step. "25°" comes from misremembering co-interior angles as adding to 90° instead of 180° (90 − 65 = 25).
2. (c) 0.7, 0.72, 3/4 — Method: numbers written in different forms cannot be compared as they stand, so every fraction is turned into a decimal by dividing the numerator by the denominator, and the decimals are then compared place by place from the left. Working: 3/4 means 3 ÷ 4 = 0.75, so the three values to compare are 0.7, 0.75 and 0.72; written to two decimal places they are 0.70, 0.75 and 0.72, and the hundredths digits 0, 5 and 2 put 0.70 first, 0.72 next and 0.75 last; written again in the forms the question used, the order from smallest is 0.7, then 0.72, then 3/4. Answer: 0.7, 0.72, 3/4. The distractors: 3/4, 0.7, 0.72 comes from turning 3/4 into 0.34 by writing the numerator and the denominator as the two digits after the point, which makes the fraction the smallest of the three; 0.72, 3/4, 0.7 comes from the belief that the more digits a decimal has the smaller it must be, which puts both 0.72 and 0.75 below 0.7 and 0.72 below 0.75; 3/4, 0.72, 0.7 comes from comparing the three values correctly but listing them largest first, against an instruction to start with the smallest.
3. (d) 30 — Method: 50% is one half, so 50% of a quantity is the quantity divided by 2. Working: 60 ÷ 2 = 30. Answer: 30. The distractors: 120 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing; 3000 comes from multiplying by 50 without dividing by 100; 6 comes from finding 10% instead of 50%.
4. (b) P, since OP = 5 and OQ = 6 — Using the distance formula, OP = √(3² + 4²) = √(9 + 16) = √25 = 5, and OQ = √(6² + 0²) = √36 = 6. Since 5 is less than 6, P is closer to the origin. Naming Q as closer, with OQ = 5 and OP = 6, has the two distances swapped around the wrong point. Naming P as closer but with OP = 6 and OQ = 5 also has the two values swapped, even though it names the right point. The distances are not equal, since 5 is not the same as 6, so P and Q are not equally distant from the origin.
5. (d) x = 5 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 5, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 5x + 15 = 40; subtracting 15 from both sides gives 5x = 25; dividing both sides by 5 gives x = 5. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: x = 8 comes from dividing both sides by 5 first, reaching x + 3 = 8 and writing 8 as the value of x without taking the 3 away; x = 11 comes from adding 15 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 5x = 55; x = 7.4 comes from expanding 5(x + 3) as 5x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 5, which leads to 5x = 37.
6. (a) 20 — Dice A is fair, so its expected number of sixes is 150 × 1/6 = 25. Dice B has P(6) = 0.3, so its expected number of sixes is 150 × 0.3 = 45. The difference is 45 − 25 = 20. Adding the two expected values instead of subtracting them gives 25 + 45 = 70. Reporting Dice B's expected sixes on their own, without comparing to Dice A, gives 45. Using the fair probability 1/6 for Dice B as well as Dice A ignores the bias altogether, giving 150 × 1/6 = 25 for both dice and a difference of 0.
7. (b) 32 km — Method: work out the scale factor connecting the two mile values: 20 miles is 4 times 5 miles (20 ÷ 5 = 4), so multiply the km value by 4 too: 8 × 4 = 32 km. Distractor origins: 24 km comes from subtracting the mile values (20 − 5 = 15), dividing by 5 to get a wrong scale factor of 3, then multiplying 8 × 3; 23 km comes from adding the difference in miles, 15, directly to the km value, 8; 16 km comes from using a scale factor of 2, doubling the km value once instead of scaling by the correct factor of 4.
8. (c) 1.25 cm — Method: find the real length using the first map's scale, then use the second map's scale to find its drawn length. Working: real length = 5 × 20 000 = 100 000 cm. On the second map: 100 000 ÷ 80 000 = 1.25 cm. Wrong options: 20 cm comes from inverting the ratio of the two scales (5 × 80 000 ÷ 20 000); 5 cm comes from wrongly assuming the length looks the same on both maps; 12.5 cm comes from dropping a zero from the second scale factor and dividing by 8 000 instead of 80 000 (100 000 ÷ 8 000).
9. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
10. (a) 12 m² — Real length = 8 × 50 = 400 cm = 4 m. Real width = 6 × 50 = 300 cm = 3 m. Real area = 4 × 3 = 12 m². Scaling the plan area (8 × 6 = 48 cm²) by 50 instead of by 50 squared gives 48 × 50 = 2400 cm² = 0.24 m² — area scales by the square of the length scale factor, not the scale factor itself. Multiplying the real dimensions in centimetres, 400 × 300 = 120 000, and calling the result 120 000 m² mistakes square centimetres for square metres. Converting only the length to metres and leaving the width as 6 (treating centimetres as metres), 4 × 6 = 24, gives 24 m², from a scaling that was never finished.
11. (d) 32 — The frequency tree already shows the tea-and-coffee branch directly: of the 50 tea drinkers, 32 also drink coffee, so n(T ∩ C) = 32. Adding both coffee branches together, 32 + 6 = 38, gives n(C), the total number of coffee drinkers, not just those who also drink tea. Using the non-tea branch's figure, 6, describes people who drink coffee but NOT tea. Subtracting to get 50 − 32 = 18 finds the tea drinkers who do NOT drink coffee, the opposite region to the one asked for.
12. (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.