⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) An under-estimate, by 8 — Method: work out the exact product, then compare it with the estimate; an estimate that is smaller than the exact value is an under-estimate, and the difference between them is the size of the error. Working: 48 × 21 = 48 × 20 + 48 = 960 + 48 = 1,008, and 1,008 − 1,000 = 8, so the estimate falls short. Answer: an under-estimate, by 8. The distractors: an over-estimate by 8 has the size of the error right but the direction wrong, and comes from assuming that rounding 48 up to 50 must push the estimate above the exact value, without allowing for 21 being rounded down; an over-estimate by 19 comes from working out 48 × 21 as 48 × 20 + 21 = 981, adding a 21 where another 48 belongs; the claim that the estimate is exactly right comes from arguing that one number was rounded up and the other down, so the two changes must cancel.
2. (c) £7.85 — Arc length = (90 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 0.25 × 62.8 = 15.7 cm. Cost = 15.7 × £0.50 = £7.85. (£31.40 comes from finding the full circumference and forgetting the angle fraction; £15.70 comes from using the diameter, 20 cm, in place of the radius; £157.00 comes from multiplying the arc length by the radius instead of by the cost per centimetre.)
3. (c) 2 — Set A, the multiples of 3, is {3, 6, 9}. Removing the numbers that are also in set B, the even numbers {2, 4, 6, 8, 10}, leaves {3, 9} — 2 numbers are in A but not B. Giving 3, the whole size of set A, forgets to remove the number 6, which is also even. Giving 7 counts every number in A or B combined, {2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10}, rather than only those in A but not B. Giving 4 counts the numbers in set B but not set A, {2, 4, 8, 10}, the wrong way round.
4. (d) 4 — Method: a plane of symmetry must pass through the apex and cut the base along one of the base's own lines of symmetry. Working: a square has 4 lines of symmetry (2 through opposite edge midpoints, 2 through opposite corners), and each of these, combined with the apex, gives one plane of symmetry of the pyramid. A student who answers 2 has only found the planes through the edge midpoints, or only the ones through the corners, and missed the other pair. A student who answers 8 has doubled the correct count, perhaps confusing it with a different solid. A student who answers 1 has only spotted the one obvious front-to-back plane. Answer: 4.
5. (d) (11, −2) — First undo the original translation to find the vertex on the original shape: (1 − (−8), 6 − 3) = (9, 3). Then apply the second vector to that original vertex: (9 + 2, 3 + (−5)) = (11, −2). (3, 1) comes from applying the second vector to the image point (1, 6) instead of to the original vertex — (1 + 2, 6 + (−5)) = (3, 1). (7, 8) comes from subtracting the second vector from the original vertex (9, 3) instead of adding it — (9 − 2, 3 − (−5)) = (7, 8). (11, 3) comes from applying only the x-component of the second vector to the original vertex and leaving the y-coordinate unchanged.
6. (c) The frequency of that category — Method: a bar chart for categorical data has one bar for each category, and the vertical scale on which the bars are measured is a count. Working: a bar drawn twice as tall as another tells you that twice as many items of data fell into its category, so the height measures how many items of data belong to that one category, which is exactly what a frequency is. Answer: the height of each bar is the frequency of that category — a count of items of data. The distractors: the number of different categories comes from reading the vertical scale as though it counted the bars, which is shown along the horizontal axis instead; the total of all the data comes from treating one bar as though it stood for the whole data set rather than for one category; the mean of all the data comes from confusing a bar chart with a measure of average, which no single bar can show.
7. (b) 3 — Method: solving an index equation like this means finding how many factors of the base multiply together to give the number on the right. Working: 4¹ = 4, 4² = 16 and 4³ = 64, so three factors of 4 are needed. Answer: 3. The distractors: 4 comes from listing 4, 16 and 64 and counting the base itself as a step, which gives one more than the index; 6 comes from solving the equation with 2 as the base instead of 4, since 2⁶ = 64; 16 comes from dividing 64 by 4, treating the index as an instruction to divide.
8. (d) If the graph has two real roots, they are equal and opposite in value, so they sum to zero. — A turning point on the y-axis means the graph's axis of symmetry is the line x = 0, so any two roots must be symmetrical about x = 0 — equal in size but opposite in sign, summing to zero. The graph could still have no real roots, but that is not guaranteed just from the turning point's position, so the option claiming it must have none is too strong. The roots do not have to both be positive — if real, one is positive and one negative (or both are zero). The graph does not have to touch the x-axis at exactly one point either; it could cross at two symmetrical points, touch at one point, or miss the x-axis entirely.
9. (b) Wrong: 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 3.2 l = 3200 ml. — 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 3.2 litres = 3.2 × 1000 = 3200 ml — Sam is wrong because he multiplied by 100 instead of 1000. Saying Sam is correct accepts the wrong multiplier. Saying Sam is wrong only because 3.2 should be rounded first misses the real error, which is the multiplier, not the starting number. Saying '1 litre is 100 ml' misstates the basic fact and blames the wrong part of Sam's working.
10. (b) 1 : 3 — Write the two lengths as a ratio: 5 : 15. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 5, to give 1 : 3. Writing 3 : 1 swaps the order, comparing B to A instead of A to B. Leaving the ratio as 5 : 15 has not been simplified. Finding 1 : 2 comes from comparing the smaller length to the gap between the two lengths (15 − 5 = 10, then wrongly simplifying 5 : 10), not from comparing the two lengths themselves.
11. (a) £14224 — Value after 2 years: £15000 × 1.04 × 1.04 = £16224. Money left after buying the trailer: £16224 − £2000 = £14224. £14200 comes from treating the two 4% increases as a single flat 8% increase applied once instead of compounding: £15000 × 1.08 = £16200, and £16200 − £2000 = £14200. £13600 comes from applying the 4% increase only once, for 1 year instead of 2: £15000 × 1.04 = £15600, and £15600 − £2000 = £13600. £18224 comes from adding the £2000 instead of subtracting it: £16224 + £2000 = £18224.
12. (b) £60 — £48 represents 100% − 20% = 80% of the original price. 1% = £48 ÷ 80 = £0.60, so 100% = £0.60 × 100 = £60.