⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 14 — Brackets first: 9 − 6 = 3. Then multiply: 3 × 3 = 9. Then add: 5 + 9 = 14. So the answer is 14. A candidate who worked out (5 + 3) × (9 − 6) = 8 × 3 = 24 added before multiplying, ignoring the priority of operations outside the bracket. A candidate who dropped the brackets and worked out 5 + 3 × 9 − 6 = 5 + 27 − 6 = 26 multiplied by the 9 itself instead of by the bracket's value of 3, losing the grouping the brackets give. A candidate who forgot to add the 5 and only worked out 3 × (9 − 6) = 3 × 3 = 9 dropped a term from the calculation.
2. (d) £6705 — After the first year: £6400 × 1.08 = £6912. After the second year: £6912 × 0.97 = £6704.64, which rounds to £6705 (nearest pound). £6720 comes from treating the +8% and −3% changes as a single net +5% change applied to the original amount instead of applying each change in turn: £6400 × 1.05 = £6720. £6912 comes from applying only the first year's growth and stopping there, without applying the second year's fall. £7104 comes from adding the two percentages together as +11% and applying that to the original amount instead of applying each change to the correct starting amount in turn: £6400 × 1.11 = £7104.
3. (c) y = 2 — Method: substituting Noah's value shows why it fails, and the equation is then solved by undoing the addition. Working: substituting y = 3 gives 3 + 10 = 13, which is not 12, so Noah's value is not a solution; subtracting 10 from both sides of y + 10 = 12 gives y = 2, and substituting back gives 2 + 10 = 12. Answer: y = 2. The distractors: y = 22 comes from adding 10 to both sides instead of subtracting it; y = −2 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, 10 − 12 rather than 12 − 10; y = 12 comes from copying the right-hand side as the value of y and ignoring the 10 that is added to it.
4. (a) Similar, but AAA alone does not prove congruence — Three equal corresponding angles (AAA) show that the two triangles are similar — the same shape — but says nothing about their size, so it does not prove congruence. They could be congruent, or one could simply be an enlargement of the other; without matching side lengths, congruence is not established, so 'congruent because AAA proves congruence' is wrong. Equal angles do not force equal sides — a triangle can be enlarged to any size while keeping the same angles, so that option is also wrong. Something CAN be said here — that the triangles are similar — so 'no relationship can be determined' is wrong too.
5. (c) 26 — The number who play football or basketball is 27 + 21 − 9 = 39, subtracting the 9 who play both so they are not counted twice. The number who play neither is then 65 − 39 = 26. Giving 39 stops after finding the number who play football or basketball, without taking the complement within the 65 members. Subtracting all three given numbers from 65, 65 − 27 − 21 − 9 = 8, treats the 9 who play both as a separate group rather than a correction for double-counting. Adding 27 and 21 without removing the double-counted 9, then subtracting that total from 65, gives 65 − (27 + 21) = 17.
6. (c) 693 — Method: multiplying a bracket by a number multiplies every term inside it, so 7 × (100 − 1) = 7 × 100 − 7 × 1. Working: 7 × 100 = 700 and 7 × 1 = 7, so the calculation becomes 700 − 7 = 693. Answer: 693. The distractors: 699 comes from subtracting the 1 itself rather than 7 lots of it, giving 700 − 1 = 699; 707 comes from adding the second product instead of subtracting it, giving 700 + 7 = 707; 700 comes from rounding 99 up to 100 and then offering the estimate 7 × 100 as an exact value.
7. (d) 2 : 3 — x is 2/3 of y means for every 3 parts of y, x is 2 parts, so x : y = 2 : 3. 3 : 2 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round. 2 : 5 comes from comparing x with the total of x and y (2 parts out of 5), instead of with y alone. 3 : 5 comes from comparing y with the total of x and y (3 parts out of 5), instead of with x.
8. (b) 2π — Method: treat π as a single unit and subtract the coefficients, just as with algebraic terms. Working: 3π − π = 3π − 1π = 2π. Answer: 2π. 4π comes from adding the coefficients instead of subtracting: 3π + π = 4π. 3 comes from cancelling the π, treating 3π − π as if it were the division 3π ÷ π = 3. 2 comes from finding the correct coefficient, 2, but forgetting to keep π in the final answer.
9. (a) 2 — The candle's height falls from 30 cm to 20 cm, a drop of 10 cm, over 5 minutes, so m = 10 ÷ 5 = 2. 10 comes from using the drop in height but forgetting to divide by the time. 0.5 comes from dividing the time by the drop instead of the drop by the time (5 ÷ 10). 4 comes from dividing the final height by the time, 20 ÷ 5, instead of using the drop in height.
10. (d) 706.5 cm² — Area of a circle = πr². With r = 15 cm and π = 3.14, area = 3.14 × 15² = 3.14 × 225 = 706.5 cm². A student who uses the circumference formula 2πr instead of the area formula gets 2 × 3.14 × 15 = 94.2 cm². A student who uses πr instead, forgetting to double, gets 3.14 × 15 = 47.1 cm². A student who squares the diameter (30 cm) instead of the radius gets 3.14 × 900 = 2826.0 cm².
11. (a) 2/3 — Put the laptop bag's mass over the school bag's mass: 2.4/3.6. Multiply both numbers by 10 to clear the decimals: 24/36. Divide both by their highest common factor, 12: 24÷12 = 2, 36÷12 = 3, giving 2/3. (3/2 comes from writing the masses the wrong way round. 1/3 comes from finding the difference in the masses, 3.6 − 2.4 = 1.2 kg, and writing it as a fraction of the school bag's mass, 1.2/3.6. 2/5 comes from comparing the laptop bag's mass to the total mass of both bags, 2.4/6.)
12. (d) £8262 — A fall of 15% is a multiplier of 0.85 and a fall of 10% is a multiplier of 0.9, and each multiplier acts on the value at the start of its own year. After year 1: 12000 × 0.85 = 10200. After year 2: 10200 × 0.9 = 9180. After year 3: 9180 × 0.9 = 8262. The value 3 years after the car was bought is £8262. Adding the percentages to make a single fall of 35% would be wrong, because the later falls are taken from smaller values.