⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) x/5 — Read the decimal as a fraction first: 0.2 is 2 tenths, so the coefficient is 2/10. Dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 cancels this to 1/5, and a coefficient of 1/5 in front of a letter is written x/5. Reading the digit 2 as 'a half' gives x/2; reading 0.2 as 1/20 gives x/20; dividing only the denominator by 2 leaves 2/5, which is the coefficient 0.4 and twice as large as it should be.
2. (a) x > 4 — Subtract 2x from both sides: 3x − 3 > 9. Add 3 to both sides: 3x > 12. Divide both sides by 3: x > 4. A candidate who subtracts 3 from 9 instead of adding gets 3x > 6, so x > 2. A candidate who divides correctly but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative) gets x < 4. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing gets x > 36.
3. (c) 0.94 — Method: a fraction is written as a decimal by making the denominator a power of ten, because the decimal places record tenths, hundredths and thousandths. Working: 50 × 2 = 100, so the numerator must also be multiplied by 2, giving 47 × 2 = 94 and the equivalent fraction 94/100; 94 hundredths is written with two digits after the decimal point. Answer: 0.94. The distractors: 0.47 comes from treating the denominator as though it were already 100 and writing the digits of the numerator straight after the point; 4.7 comes from dividing 47 by 10 instead of by 50; 0.094 comes from multiplying the denominator by 20 to reach 1000 but the numerator by only 2, giving 94/1000.
4. (a) 33.5 mph — Method: the smallest possible actual value is half the rounding unit below the given value. Working: half of 1 mph is 0.5 mph, so the smallest possible speed is 34 − 0.5 = 33.5 mph. Answer: 33.5 mph. (33 mph comes from subtracting the whole rounding unit, 1, instead of half of it. 34 mph comes from giving the rounded value itself rather than the lower bound. 34.5 mph comes from adding the half unit instead of subtracting it, giving the upper bound.)
5. (c) 2/3 — Method: 'as a fraction of' puts the quantity named after the word 'of' on the bottom, so the red counters go on top and the blue counters go on the bottom. Working: the fraction is 12/18; the highest common factor of 12 and 18 is 6, and 12 ÷ 6 = 2 while 18 ÷ 6 = 3. Answer: 2/3. The distractors: 2/5 comes from comparing the red counters with the total number of counters, 12/30, a part-to-whole fraction when the question asks for one part compared with the other part; 3/2 comes from writing the blue counters over the red counters, 18/12, reversing the order the question gives; 1/2 comes from simplifying 12/18 by subtracting the common factor instead of dividing by it, 12 − 6 = 6 and 18 − 6 = 12, giving 6/12, which then cancels to 1/2.
6. (b) Semicircle — Method: recall the special name for exactly half of a circle. Working: a diameter splits the circle into two identical halves, and each half has its own specific name. A student who answers segment has confused this special case with the general region cut off by any chord. A student who answers sector has confused it with the pie-slice shape made by two radii. A student who answers arc has only named the curved edge, not the whole two-dimensional region. Answer: semicircle.
7. (a) 1200 — Method: take the estimate from the larger sample, because an unbiased relative frequency tends towards the true probability as the sample grows, then multiply by the number of bulbs made in a week. Working: Inspector B tested 500 bulbs, far more than Inspector A's 40, so use B's relative frequency: 30 ÷ 500 = 0.06. A week's production is 4000 × 5 = 20000 bulbs. The expected number of faulty bulbs is 20000 × 0.06 = 1200. Answer: about 1200 faulty bulbs a week. The distractors: 2000 uses Inspector A's estimate, 4 ÷ 40 = 0.1, giving 20000 × 0.1 = 2000, and so rests on a sample of only 40 bulbs; 1600 comes from averaging the two estimates of 0.1 and 0.06 to get 0.08, and 20000 × 0.08 = 1600, which gives the small sample equal weight with the large one; 240 uses the right estimate but stops at a single day, 4000 × 0.06 = 240.
8. (b) Neither, because both coordinates differ — A line segment is horizontal only when both points share the same y-coordinate, and vertical only when both points share the same x-coordinate. Here A has x-coordinate −4 and B has x-coordinate 2, which differ, and A has y-coordinate 3 and B has y-coordinate 6, which also differ, so the segment is neither horizontal nor vertical. Every point has a y-coordinate and an x-coordinate, so simply having one is not a reason for the line to be horizontal or vertical — both of those wrong reasons ignore that the coordinates must match, not just exist. The x-coordinates do increase from A to B, but an increasing x-coordinate on its own describes a slope, not a horizontal line.
9. (c) £624.32 — A 4% rise is a multiplier of 1.04, applied once each year. After year 1: 5000 × 1.04 = 5200. After year 2: 5200 × 1.04 = 5408. After year 3: 5408 × 1.04 = 5624.32. The question asks for the interest, not the value of the account, so take away the amount invested at the start: 5624.32 − 5000 = 624.32. The total interest earned is £624.32.
10. (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
11. (d) The candle's height decreases by 0.3 cm every minute. — A negative gradient means the quantity on the vertical axis decreases as the quantity on the horizontal axis increases. The size of the gradient, 0.3, gives the amount of decrease per minute.
12. (c) 8 — Method: substitute x = 3 into each expression in turn, working out the bracket first in the expression that has one and the multiplication first in the expression that does not. Working: 2(x + 1) gives 2 × (3 + 1) = 2 × 4 = 8, and 2x + 2 gives 2 × 3 + 2 = 6 + 2 = 8, so both expressions take the value 8, as Grace claims. Answer: 8. The distractors: 7 comes from multiplying only the x inside the bracket and then adding the 1, giving 2 × 3 + 1; 10 comes from reading 2x + 2 as 2(x + 2) and working out 2 × 5; 6 comes from substituting into 2x and stopping before the 2 is added.