⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) (5, 7) — Method: a midpoint is the mean of the two end points, so for each coordinate (start + end) ÷ 2 = midpoint; rearranging that gives end = 2 × midpoint less the start. Working: for x, (1 + x) ÷ 2 = 3, so 1 + x = 6 and x = 5. For y, (3 + y) ÷ 2 = 5, so 3 + y = 10 and y = 7. B is therefore (5, 7). Answer: (5, 7). The distractors: (2, 2) comes from subtracting A from the midpoint, (3 − 1, 5 − 3), which gives the step from A to the midpoint and stops there instead of taking that same step a second time; (4, 8) comes from adding A to the midpoint, (3 + 1, 5 + 3), without doubling the midpoint first; (6, 10) comes from doubling the midpoint, (2 × 3, 2 × 5), and then forgetting to take A off.
2. (a) 2 — The common ratio is 54 ÷ 162 = 1/3, confirmed by 18 ÷ 54 = 1/3 and 6 ÷ 18 = 1/3. The next term is 6 × 1/3 = 2. A candidate who wrongly treats the sequence as arithmetic and subtracts the last difference (18 − 6 = 12) again gets 6 − 12 = −6. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing, effectively reversing the sequence, gets 18. A candidate who guesses the ratio is 1/2 gets 6 × 1/2 = 3.
3. (a) 8.15 ≤ y < 8.25 — Rounding to 1 decimal place means the error interval spans half of 0.1, so 0.05, either side of 8.2: 8.2 − 0.05 = 8.15 and 8.2 + 0.05 = 8.25. The lower bound uses ≤ because 8.15 itself rounds to 8.2, but the upper bound uses < because 8.25 would round up to 8.3. So the error interval is 8.15 ≤ y < 8.25. A candidate who used the wrong rounding band gave 8.1 ≤ y < 8.2. A candidate who used a strict inequality at both ends wrote 8.15 < y < 8.25, wrongly excluding 8.15 itself. A candidate who added the full 0.1 instead of half of it wrote 8.2 ≤ y < 8.3.
4. (b) €230.00 — Multiply the amount in pounds by the exchange rate: 200 × 1.15 = 230, so £200 = €230.00. Working out 200 + 1.15 = 201.15 treats the exchange rate as an amount to add rather than a multiplier. Working out 200 × 0.15 = 30 finds only the extra amount earned for every pound and forgets to add it back to the original £200. Working out 200 × 11.5 = 2300.00 misplaces the decimal point in the exchange rate, multiplying by 11.5 instead of 1.15. £200 converts to €230.00.
5. (c) Map A, where the distance is 40 cm — 10 km = 1,000,000 cm. On Map A: 1000000 ÷ 25000 = 40 cm. On Map B: 1000000 ÷ 50000 = 20 cm. Since 40 cm is longer than 20 cm, the same real distance appears longer on Map A, the map with the smaller scale number. 'Map B, where the distance is 20 cm' has the correct working for Map B but names the wrong map as the one with the longer length. 'Map A, where the distance is 20 cm' correctly identifies Map A but pairs it with Map B's length. 'Map B, where the distance is 40 cm' correctly identifies Map A's length but attaches it to the wrong map.
6. (d) 4.6 cm — Method: BC is opposite the 30° angle and AC is next to it, so the ratio that links the two is tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan 30° = BC ÷ 8, so BC = 8 × tan 30° = 4.6188…, which is 4.6 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 4.6 cm. The distractors: 13.9 cm comes from dividing by tan 30° instead of multiplying by it; 4.0 cm comes from using sin 30°, which treats the 8 cm side as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the 30° angle; 6.9 cm comes from using cos 30° in place of tan 30°, which gives the wrong pair of sides.
7. (d) Yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6 — Method: two ratios are equal when their cross-products are equal, so multiply the first part of each ratio by the second part of the other. Working: 4 × 9 = 36 and 6 × 6 = 36; the two products match, so the ratios are equal, and simplifying both to 2:3 shows the same thing. Answer: yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6. The distractors: the reason that the number 6 appears in both ratios reaches the right verdict from a surface match, since a figure shared by two ratios says nothing about equivalence — 4:6 and 6:5 share a 6 and are not equal; the reason built on 9 − 6 and 6 − 4 compares the differences inside each ratio, 3 against 2, which is additive thinking and ends at a verdict of no; the reason built on 4 × 6 and 6 × 9 multiplies the two parts of each ratio together instead of across the pair, giving 24 against 54 and again a verdict of no.
8. (a) 8 × 10² — Method: to multiply numbers written in standard form, multiply the coefficients and add the indices. Working: 4 × 2 = 8 for the coefficients, and −3 + 5 = 2 for the indices; 8 already lies between 1 and 10, so no adjustment is needed. Answer: 8 × 10². The distractors: 6 × 10² comes from adding the coefficients, 4 + 2, instead of multiplying them; 8 × 10⁸ comes from ignoring the minus sign and adding 3 + 5; 8 × 10⁻¹⁵ comes from multiplying the indices, −3 × 5, instead of adding them.
9. (d) 706.5 cm² — Area of a circle = πr². With r = 15 cm and π = 3.14, area = 3.14 × 15² = 3.14 × 225 = 706.5 cm². A student who uses the circumference formula 2πr instead of the area formula gets 2 × 3.14 × 15 = 94.2 cm². A student who uses πr instead, forgetting to double, gets 3.14 × 15 = 47.1 cm². A student who squares the diameter (30 cm) instead of the radius gets 3.14 × 900 = 2826.0 cm².
10. (d) 3/36 — Method: list the results as ordered pairs, decide which totals satisfy the condition, count the pairs that give those totals and divide by the number of pairs there are. Working: there are 6 × 6 = 36 equally likely ordered pairs. Greater than 10 means a total of 11 or a total of 12. A total of 11 comes from (5, 6) and (6, 5); a total of 12 comes from (6, 6) alone, because both dice must show a 6. That is 2 + 1 = 3 pairs out of the 36. Answer: the probability is 3/36. The distractors: 2/36 comes from counting the two ways of making 11 and forgetting that 12 is greater than 10 as well; 4/36 comes from writing (6, 6) down twice, applying the rule that a pair can be turned round to a double that can only happen one way; 33/36 comes from reading the condition the wrong way round and giving the probability that the total is 10 or less.
11. (a) 4 days — Method: the fence is a fixed amount of work, so builders × days is constant; find that product and divide it by the new number of builders. Working: 3 × 12 = 36 builder-days of work, so with 9 builders the time is 36 ÷ 9 = 4 days. Answer: 4 days. The distractors: 6 days comes from halving the 12 days because there are more builders, rather than dividing by the factor of 3 by which the workforce has grown; 36 days is the constant product of builders and days, given as a number of days instead of being shared between the builders; 9 days comes from taking 3 days off the 12, treating three extra builders as three fewer days, which is additive rather than proportional.
12. (c) 56.52 cm² — Sector area = (45 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 12² = 0.125 × 3.14 × 144 = 56.52 cm². (4.71 cm² comes from forgetting to square the radius; 452.16 cm² comes from finding the area of the whole circle and forgetting the angle fraction; 9.42 cm² comes from using the arc length formula instead of the sector area formula.)