Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Expressions, equations, formulae, identities and inequalities worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions on "expressions, equations, formulae, identities and inequalities" — DfE statement A3. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Answer key: Expressions, equations, formulae, identities and inequalities worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) a formula — A statement that shows how to calculate one quantity from others, using an equals sign, is a formula. P = 2l + 2w tells us how to work out the perimeter, P, from the length and width, so it is a formula. Distractor origins: 'an equation' confuses a formula linking several letters with an equation solved for one unknown value; 'an identity' confuses a formula with a statement that is true for every value of a single variable; 'an expression' forgets that an expression has no equals sign at all.
- (d) 3 — The expression has three terms separated by + and − signs: 4x², −7x and 3. A candidate who thinks a number on its own does not count as a term says there are 2 terms, missing the 3. A candidate who miscounts the minus sign as creating an extra term says there are 4. A candidate who splits each term into its coefficient and letter part separately (4, x², 7, x, 3) says there are 5.
- (d) 2n + 7 > 15 — An inequality compares two expressions using a symbol other than an equals sign, such as < or >. "2n + 7" is just an expression — it has no equals or inequality sign at all, so a candidate mistaking any bare expression for an inequality would choose this. "2n + 7 = 15" is an equation: it uses an equals sign and is only true for one particular value of n, so a candidate confusing an equation with an inequality would choose this. "P = 2n + 7" is a formula, since it relates two different letters, P and n, with an equals sign, so a candidate confusing a formula with an inequality would choose this. "2n + 7 > 15" is an inequality: it compares an expression with a number using a > sign.
- (d) An inequality, because ≤ compares the two sides — The symbol ≤ means 'is less than or equal to', so the statement compares the sizes of the two sides instead of saying they are equal: that makes it an inequality. Solving it gives n ≤ 5, a whole range of values rather than the single value an equation would give. An identity has to be true for every value of the letter, and this fails at n = 6, so it is not one. A formula works one quantity out from another, and there is only one letter here.
- (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
- (a) 5x − 3 = 12 — 5x − 3 = 12 is an equation with exactly one solution: adding 3 and dividing by 5 gives x = 3, and no other value works. 5x − 3 = 5x − 3 is true for every value of x, since both sides are identical — it has infinitely many solutions, not one. 5x − 3 > 12 is an inequality: any value of x greater than 3 satisfies it, so it has a whole range of solutions, not a single one. 5x − 3 = 5x + 2 has no solution at all, since subtracting 5x from both sides leaves −3 = 2, which is never true. The equation with exactly one solution is 5x − 3 = 12.
- (a) 130 — Method: substitute the total bill into the formula, then subtract the fixed charge and divide by the cost per text message. Working: 24.50 = 18 + 0.05t, so 0.05t = 24.50 − 18 = 6.50, t = 6.50 ÷ 0.05 = 130. Answer: 130 extra text messages. 490 comes from dividing the whole bill by 0.05 without first subtracting the £18 fixed charge: 24.50 ÷ 0.05 = 490. 13 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.5 instead of 0.05, moving the decimal point one place too far: 6.50 ÷ 0.5 = 13. 65 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.1 instead of 0.05.
- (c) 3x + 5 = 17 — An equation contains an equals sign and is true only for particular value(s) of the unknown — solving 3x + 5 = 17 gives the single value x = 4. 3x + 5 is an expression: it has no equals sign, so it cannot be solved, only simplified or evaluated. A = πr² is a formula: it shows the general relationship between different quantities (area and radius), rather than asking for one unknown value. 3(x + 5) ≡ 3x + 15 is an identity: the ≡ sign shows it is true for every value of x, not just one. The equation is 3x + 5 = 17.
- (b) 12 — Method: substitute the total cost into the formula, then subtract the fixed cost and divide by the cost per person. Working: 92 = 6p + 20, so 6p = 92 − 20 = 72, p = 72 ÷ 6 = 12. Answer: 12 people. 15.33 comes from dividing the whole £92 by £6 without first subtracting the £20 fixed cost: 92 ÷ 6 ≈ 15.33. 4.3 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £6 and dividing by £20: (92 − 6) ÷ 20 = 4.3. 18.67 comes from adding the fixed cost instead of subtracting it: (92 + 20) ÷ 6 ≈ 18.67.
- (b) P = 4s — A formula is a rule connecting two or more different quantities, so that one of them can be worked out once the others are known. P = 4s does exactly that: it gives P from s. The line with no equals sign is an expression; the line with an equals sign and a single unknown letter is an equation, because it is solved to find that letter; the line joined by a comparison sign is an inequality.
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (b) £47, and T=15+8h is a formula (relates T and h). — The charge is £15 fixed plus £8 for each hour: T=15+8h, so for h=4, T=15+8×4=15+32=47. Because T=15+8h relates two different quantities, the total charge T and the number of hours h, it is a formula, not an equation — an equation is solved for one particular value of an unknown, but this relationship holds for every value of h a job might last. A candidate who forgets to include the fixed £15 fee would compute only 8×4=32. A candidate who adds the three numbers in the formula together instead of multiplying the hourly rate by the number of hours would compute 15+8+4=27. A candidate who correctly finds the charge but mistakes the formula for an equation, treating it as something to be solved for one specific value of h rather than a general relationship between T and h, would pick the correct charge with the wrong classification.
- (c) 3 and 2n + 5 are both factors of 6n + 15 — Factors are the parts multiplied together to make an expression; terms are the parts added together. In 3(2n + 5) the 3 and the bracket 2n + 5 are multiplied, so both of them are factors of 6n + 15. The parts added together are 6n and 15, and those are its two terms, not its factors. A factor need not be a number: a bracket containing letters is a factor in exactly the same way.
- (d) 66 — 6 and (4x + 3) are correct factors of 24x + 18. — Substituting x=2 into 24x+18: 24×2+18=48+18=66. Checking the factorisation: 6×4x=24x and 6×3=18, so 6(4x+3)=24x+18, matching the original expression — 6 and (4x+3) are correctly identified as factors. A candidate who substitutes x=2 into (4x+3) but forgets to multiply by the factor 6 afterwards would compute just 4×2+3=11. A candidate who adds 24 and 18 together before multiplying by x, instead of multiplying 24 by x first, would compute (24+18)×2=84. A candidate who distributes the 6 over only the first term inside the brackets, forgetting the second, would check the factorisation as 6×4x=24x but leave the 3 unmultiplied, getting 24x+3 instead of 24x+18 — and would wrongly conclude that 6 and (4x+3) are not correct factors.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.