Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16

Gradients and intercepts of linear functions worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Fifteen questions on "gradients and intercepts of linear functions" — DfE statement A10. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

Non-calculator

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: Gradients and intercepts of linear functions worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Maths · GCSE Foundation · A10 · Gradients and intercepts of linear functions · Non-calculator · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(a) 0.25 — Method: gradient = vertical rise ÷ horizontal distance. Working: gradient = 3 ÷ 12 = 0.25. Answer: the gradient of the ramp is 0.25. 4 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the vertical rise instead of the other way round. 9 comes from subtracting the rise from the horizontal distance instead of dividing. 36 comes from multiplying the rise and the horizontal distance instead of dividing.
(a) 2 — The candle's height falls from 30 cm to 20 cm, a drop of 10 cm, over 5 minutes, so m = 10 ÷ 5 = 2. 10 comes from using the drop in height but forgetting to divide by the time. 0.5 comes from dividing the time by the drop instead of the drop by the time (5 ÷ 10). 4 comes from dividing the final height by the time, 20 ÷ 5, instead of using the drop in height.
(c) 5 — Method: gradient = change in y ÷ change in x between the two points. Working: change in y = 9 − 4 = 5, change in x = 1 − 0 = 1, so gradient = 5 ÷ 1 = 5. Answer: the gradient is 5. 13 comes from adding the y-values instead of subtracting them. 4 comes from using the y-value at x = 0 instead of the change in y between the two points. 1/5 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round.
(b) (−2, 0) — Method: a graph meets the x-axis where the y-value is 0, so setting y = 0 turns the equation into a linear equation in x. Working: 0 = 3x + 6 gives 3x = −6, so x = (−6) ÷ 3 = −2 and the meeting point is (−2, 0). Answer: (−2, 0). The distractors: (2, 0) comes from solving 3x = −6 and then dropping the minus sign from the result; (0, 6) is the y-axis crossing, found by substituting x = 0 instead of y = 0; (6, 0) comes from reading the constant 6 straight off as the x-coordinate, without dividing by 3 and without changing its sign.
(d) −5 — In y = mx + c, the y-intercept is c, the constant term, not the coefficient of x. Here c = −5, so the y-intercept is −5. 4 is Beth's value, the coefficient of x (the gradient), not the intercept. 5 comes from taking the constant term but dropping its negative sign. −4 comes from taking the gradient but giving it the sign of the intercept.
(c) −2 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: 3y = 12 − 6x, so dividing every term by 3 gives y = 4 − 2x, so the gradient is −2. Answer: the gradient is −2. 2 comes from dropping the negative sign after dividing by 3. 4 comes from using the y-intercept, 4, instead of the gradient. −6 comes from reading off the coefficient of x before dividing the whole equation by 3.
(b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
(b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
(b) 7 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = 7x − 2, the coefficient of x is 7. Answer: the gradient is 7. −2 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. −7 comes from a sign error, treating the coefficient of x as negative. 2 comes from using the y-intercept but dropping its sign.
(d) The fixed call-out fee, charged before the hourly rate. — Method: compare the formula with C = (fixed charge) + (rate) × h, where the fixed charge is the part that does not depend on h. Working: in C = 40 + 25h, the term 25h depends on the number of hours, h, but 40 does not change however many hours the job takes. Answer: 40 is the fixed call-out fee. 'The hourly rate' confuses the fixed term with the coefficient of h, which is actually 25. 'The total cost for a job lasting 1 hour' comes from substituting h = 1 into the formula (40 + 25 = 65) rather than reading off the constant term. 'The number of hours worked before charging starts' wrongly treats the constant, which is in pounds, as if it were measured in hours.
(c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
(d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
(a) (40, 0) — Method: a graph crosses the x-axis where y = 0, which in this context is the moment the tank holds no water, so substituting y = 0 and solving gives the time. Working: 0 = −5x + 200 gives 5x = 200, so x = 200 ÷ 5 = 40 and the crossing point is (40, 0); the tank is empty after 40 minutes. Answer: (40, 0). The distractors: (0, 200) is the y-axis crossing, the 200 litres in the tank at the start, found by substituting x = 0 instead of y = 0; (200, 0) comes from reading the constant 200 as the x-coordinate without dividing by the 5 litres lost each minute; (0, 40) has the right number in the wrong place, with the time written as a y-coordinate.
(d) 8 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where c is the y-intercept. Working: in y = 3x + 8, the constant term is 8. Answer: the y-intercept is 8. 3 comes from confusing the y-intercept with the gradient. −8 comes from a sign error, treating the constant term as negative. 11 comes from wrongly adding the gradient and the constant term together.
(b) 20 — The rate is the gradient: the change in litres divided by the change in time. From 2 to 7 minutes, the tank gains 150 − 50 = 100 litres over 7 − 2 = 5 minutes, so the rate is 100 ÷ 5 = 20 litres per minute. 100 comes from working out the change in litres but forgetting to divide by the change in time. 25 comes from using only the first reading, 50 ÷ 2, and ignoring the second reading entirely. 0.05 comes from dividing the change in time by the change in litres instead of the other way round, 5 ÷ 100.

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.