Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Gradients and intercepts of linear functions worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions on "gradients and intercepts of linear functions" — DfE statement A10. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Gradients and intercepts of linear functions worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 1 — Method: the value of y when x = 0 is where the line meets the y-axis, which is the constant c in y = mx + c, so the gradient is worked out from the two given points first and the constant follows by substituting one of them. Working: m = (16 − 7) ÷ (5 − 2) = 9 ÷ 3 = 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 2 and y = 7 gives 7 = 3 × 2 + c, so c = 7 − 6 = 1, and the value of y when x = 0 is that constant. Answer: 1. The distractors: 3 comes from stopping at the gradient and offering it as the intercept; 4 comes from stepping back from x = 2 to x = 0 by one unit of x instead of two, 7 − 3 = 4; −1 comes from working the constant out as mx − y, 3 × 2 − 7 = −1, instead of y − mx.
- (b) −1 — Method: in the form y = mx + c the gradient m is the number multiplying x, and an x term written with no number in front of it has a coefficient of 1. Working: y = −x + 3 is the same equation as y = (−1)x + 3, so comparing it with y = mx + c gives m = −1 and c = 3. Answer: −1. The distractors: 1 comes from taking the coefficient as 1 and leaving the minus sign out of the answer; 3 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −3 comes from moving the minus sign across to the constant term and then reading the gradient off that term instead of the x term.
- (a) 2/5 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = (2x/5) − 3, the coefficient of x is 2/5. Answer: the gradient is 2/5. −3 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. 5/2 comes from inverting the fraction that multiplies x. −2/5 comes from wrongly carrying the negative sign from the −3 term onto the coefficient of x.
- (c) −2 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: 3y = 12 − 6x, so dividing every term by 3 gives y = 4 − 2x, so the gradient is −2. Answer: the gradient is −2. 2 comes from dropping the negative sign after dividing by 3. 4 comes from using the y-intercept, 4, instead of the gradient. −6 comes from reading off the coefficient of x before dividing the whole equation by 3.
- (c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
- (d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
- (d) −5 — In y = mx + c, the y-intercept is c, the constant term, not the coefficient of x. Here c = −5, so the y-intercept is −5. 4 is Beth's value, the coefficient of x (the gradient), not the intercept. 5 comes from taking the constant term but dropping its negative sign. −4 comes from taking the gradient but giving it the sign of the intercept.
- (d) 8 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where c is the y-intercept. Working: in y = 3x + 8, the constant term is 8. Answer: the y-intercept is 8. 3 comes from confusing the y-intercept with the gradient. −8 comes from a sign error, treating the constant term as negative. 11 comes from wrongly adding the gradient and the constant term together.
- (c) 5 — Method: gradient = change in y ÷ change in x between the two points. Working: change in y = 9 − 4 = 5, change in x = 1 − 0 = 1, so gradient = 5 ÷ 1 = 5. Answer: the gradient is 5. 13 comes from adding the y-values instead of subtracting them. 4 comes from using the y-value at x = 0 instead of the change in y between the two points. 1/5 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (d) −2 — Method: a gradient can only be read off an equation that is written in the form y = mx + c, so y has to be made the subject first. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 2x + y = 8 gives y = −2x + 8, and comparing that with y = mx + c gives m = −2. Answer: −2. The distractors: 2 comes from reading the coefficient of x straight off the equation as it is printed, without rearranging, so the change of sign is missed; 8 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −1/2 comes from rearranging correctly and then writing the gradient upside down, as the change in x over the change in y.
- (a) 20 — Method: the paper has run out when S = 0, so substitute S = 0 into the equation and solve for t. Working: 0 = 480 − 24t, so 24t = 480, and t = 480 / 24 = 20. Answer: it takes 20 minutes. The value 480 comes from giving the starting number of sheets, the intercept of the equation, instead of solving for t. The value 456 comes from working out 480 − 24 and stopping after one step instead of solving the equation fully. The value 0.05 comes from inverting the division, working out 24 / 480 instead of 480 / 24.
- (c) The cost, in pounds, for each extra gigabyte of data used — In C = 15 + 2g, the number multiplying g is the gradient, which gives the extra cost for each extra unit of g — here, £2 for each extra gigabyte. 'The fixed monthly fee, in pounds' describes the constant term 15, not the coefficient of g. 'The total number of gigabytes included in the plan' misreads the coefficient as a quantity of data rather than a cost per gigabyte. 'The cost … for each extra 2 gigabytes' doubles the unit the coefficient actually applies to — it is the cost for each single extra gigabyte.
- (b) 7 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = 7x − 2, the coefficient of x is 7. Answer: the gradient is 7. −2 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. −7 comes from a sign error, treating the coefficient of x as negative. 2 comes from using the y-intercept but dropping its sign.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.