Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16

Gradients and intercepts of linear functions worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Fifteen questions on "gradients and intercepts of linear functions" — DfE statement A10. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: Gradients and intercepts of linear functions worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Maths · GCSE Foundation · A10 · Gradients and intercepts of linear functions · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(d) −2 — Method: a gradient can only be read off an equation that is written in the form y = mx + c, so y has to be made the subject first. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 2x + y = 8 gives y = −2x + 8, and comparing that with y = mx + c gives m = −2. Answer: −2. The distractors: 2 comes from reading the coefficient of x straight off the equation as it is printed, without rearranging, so the change of sign is missed; 8 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −1/2 comes from rearranging correctly and then writing the gradient upside down, as the change in x over the change in y.
(b) 3 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c first, then read off the gradient. Working: dividing 4y = 12x + 20 by 4 gives y = 3x + 5, so the gradient is 3. The value 12 comes from reading the coefficient of x before dividing the equation by 4. The value 20 comes from using the constant term of the unsimplified equation instead of the gradient. The value 5 comes from finding the y-intercept, 20 / 4 = 5, and giving that instead of the gradient.
(a) 20 — Method: the paper has run out when S = 0, so substitute S = 0 into the equation and solve for t. Working: 0 = 480 − 24t, so 24t = 480, and t = 480 / 24 = 20. Answer: it takes 20 minutes. The value 480 comes from giving the starting number of sheets, the intercept of the equation, instead of solving for t. The value 456 comes from working out 480 − 24 and stopping after one step instead of solving the equation fully. The value 0.05 comes from inverting the division, working out 24 / 480 instead of 480 / 24.
(d) 4 — Method: compare the equation with the general form y = mx + c after writing the x term first, then read off the coefficient of x. Working: y = 6 + 4x can be written as y = 4x + 6, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = 4. Answer: the gradient is 4. The value 6 comes from reading off the constant, written first in the equation, and treating it as the gradient because it comes before the x term. The value 10 comes from adding the two numbers in the equation, 6 + 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x. The value 24 comes from multiplying the two numbers in the equation, 6 × 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x.
(c) 5 — Method: gradient = change in y ÷ change in x between the two points. Working: change in y = 9 − 4 = 5, change in x = 1 − 0 = 1, so gradient = 5 ÷ 1 = 5. Answer: the gradient is 5. 13 comes from adding the y-values instead of subtracting them. 4 comes from using the y-value at x = 0 instead of the change in y between the two points. 1/5 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round.
(b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
(b) 20 — The rate is the gradient: the change in litres divided by the change in time. From 2 to 7 minutes, the tank gains 150 − 50 = 100 litres over 7 − 2 = 5 minutes, so the rate is 100 ÷ 5 = 20 litres per minute. 100 comes from working out the change in litres but forgetting to divide by the change in time. 25 comes from using only the first reading, 50 ÷ 2, and ignoring the second reading entirely. 0.05 comes from dividing the change in time by the change in litres instead of the other way round, 5 ÷ 100.
(c) The cost, in pounds, for each extra gigabyte of data used — In C = 15 + 2g, the number multiplying g is the gradient, which gives the extra cost for each extra unit of g — here, £2 for each extra gigabyte. 'The fixed monthly fee, in pounds' describes the constant term 15, not the coefficient of g. 'The total number of gigabytes included in the plan' misreads the coefficient as a quantity of data rather than a cost per gigabyte. 'The cost … for each extra 2 gigabytes' doubles the unit the coefficient actually applies to — it is the cost for each single extra gigabyte.
(a) 1 — Method: the value of y when x = 0 is where the line meets the y-axis, which is the constant c in y = mx + c, so the gradient is worked out from the two given points first and the constant follows by substituting one of them. Working: m = (16 − 7) ÷ (5 − 2) = 9 ÷ 3 = 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 2 and y = 7 gives 7 = 3 × 2 + c, so c = 7 − 6 = 1, and the value of y when x = 0 is that constant. Answer: 1. The distractors: 3 comes from stopping at the gradient and offering it as the intercept; 4 comes from stepping back from x = 2 to x = 0 by one unit of x instead of two, 7 − 3 = 4; −1 comes from working the constant out as mx − y, 3 × 2 − 7 = −1, instead of y − mx.
(b) 7 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = 7x − 2, the coefficient of x is 7. Answer: the gradient is 7. −2 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. −7 comes from a sign error, treating the coefficient of x as negative. 2 comes from using the y-intercept but dropping its sign.
(d) (3, 0) — Method: every point on the x-axis has y-coordinate 0, so substituting y = 0 into the equation and solving gives the x-coordinate of the crossing point. Working: 0 = 2x − 6 gives 2x = 6, so x = 6 ÷ 2 = 3 and the graph crosses the x-axis at (3, 0). Answer: (3, 0). The distractors: (0, −6) is where the graph crosses the y-axis, found by substituting x = 0 rather than y = 0; (−3, 0) comes from moving the 6 across the equals sign without changing its sign, giving 2x = −6; (6, 0) comes from reading the constant straight off as the crossing point and never dividing by the gradient 2.
(a) 2/5 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = (2x/5) − 3, the coefficient of x is 2/5. Answer: the gradient is 2/5. −3 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. 5/2 comes from inverting the fraction that multiplies x. −2/5 comes from wrongly carrying the negative sign from the −3 term onto the coefficient of x.
(c) 3 — Method: a point that lies on a graph makes its equation true, so substituting the coordinates into y = mx + 6 leaves an equation in m alone. Working: substituting x = −2 and y = 0 gives 0 = m × (−2) + 6, which rearranges to −2m = −6, so m = (−6) ÷ (−2) = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: −3 comes from dividing −6 by 2 and keeping the minus sign, overlooking that the divisor is negative too, so the two signs cancel; −2 comes from writing down the x-coordinate of the given point in place of the gradient; 6 comes from reading the constant in y = mx + 6 as the gradient, confusing m with c.
(d) 8 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where c is the y-intercept. Working: in y = 3x + 8, the constant term is 8. Answer: the y-intercept is 8. 3 comes from confusing the y-intercept with the gradient. −8 comes from a sign error, treating the constant term as negative. 11 comes from wrongly adding the gradient and the constant term together.
(b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.