Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
- (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
- (b) t − 1 — Method: "fewer than" means a subtraction, and the amount taken away is taken away from the quantity being compared with. Working: Grace has t books and Noah has one book fewer, so Noah has t with 1 taken off, written t − 1. Answer: t − 1. The distractors: t + 1 comes from reading "fewer" as "more" and adding instead of subtracting; 1 − t comes from writing the subtraction the wrong way round, taking Grace's books from the 1 rather than the 1 from Grace's books; t comes from giving the number of books Grace has, which is not the person the question asks about.
- (a) x + 14 — Expand each bracket separately: 3(x + 4) = 3x + 12, and −2(x − 1) = −2x + 2 (multiply −2 by both x and −1). Combine: 3x + 12 − 2x + 2 = x + 14. Writing x + 10 comes from taking −2(x − 1) as −2x − 2, not flipping the sign of the −1 inside the bracket. Writing 5x + 10 comes from treating the second bracket as +2(x − 1) instead of subtracting it, so the x-terms are added rather than subtracted. Writing x + 13 comes from only multiplying the 2 by the x, and carrying the −1 across unmultiplied.
- (d) 3, 6, 12, 24 — Method: a term-to-term rule is applied to the term just written, so start with the first term and use the rule three more times. Working: the first term is 3; 3 × 2 = 6 is the second; 6 × 2 = 12 is the third; 12 × 2 = 24 is the fourth. Answer: 3, 6, 12, 24. The distractors: 3, 5, 7, 9 comes from adding 2 each time instead of multiplying by 2; 3, 9, 27, 81 comes from multiplying by the first term, 3, instead of by the multiplier 2 the rule gives; 6, 12, 24, 48 comes from doubling before writing anything down, so the list starts one term too late and the given first term is missing.
- (d) 110 — Method: form the equation 15 + 0.08m = 23.80, where m is the number of minutes, then solve for m. Working: subtract the fixed fee: 0.08m = 23.80 − 15 = 8.80. Divide by the cost per minute: m = 8.80 ÷ 0.08 = 110. Answer: 110 minutes. 1.1 comes from using 8 instead of 0.08 as the cost per minute, forgetting to convert pence to pounds. 297.5 comes from dividing the whole bill by the cost per minute without subtracting the fixed fee first, 23.80 ÷ 0.08. 485 comes from adding the fixed fee to the bill instead of subtracting it, before dividing by the cost per minute, (23.80 + 15) ÷ 0.08.
- (b) x = (y − 3)/5 — To make x the subject of y = 5x + 3, first subtract 3 from both sides to get y − 3 = 5x, then divide both sides by 5: x = (y − 3)/5. Writing x = (y + 3)/5 keeps the division correct but does not change the sign of the 3 when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 − 3 divides only the y term by 5 and leaves the 3 as a separate subtraction, instead of subtracting first and dividing the whole expression. Writing x = 5(y − 3) applies the correct order of subtracting 3 first, but then multiplies by 5 instead of dividing — the inverse of 5x is division, not multiplication. The correct rearrangement is x = (y − 3)/5.
- (c) y = x² — Method: test a candidate rule against every pair given, not just one — a rule that fits one pair and fails another is not the rule. Working: the outputs 1, 4, 9 rise by 3 and then by 5, so they are not going up in equal steps and the input is not simply multiplied by a fixed number; comparing each output with its own input gives 1 × 1 = 1, 2 × 2 = 4 and 3 × 3 = 9, and all three pairs fit. Answer: y = x². The distractors: y = 3x comes from fitting only the last pair, where 3 × 3 = 9, and reading that 3 as a multiplier; y = 3x − 2 comes from assuming a multiply-then-add rule and using the first step in the outputs, 4 − 1 = 3, as the multiplier — it fits the first two pairs and fails the third; y = 2x comes from fitting only the pair 2 and 4 and reading every output as double its input.
- (d) −5 — In y = mx + c, the y-intercept is c, the constant term, not the coefficient of x. Here c = −5, so the y-intercept is −5. 4 is Beth's value, the coefficient of x (the gradient), not the intercept. 5 comes from taking the constant term but dropping its negative sign. −4 comes from taking the gradient but giving it the sign of the intercept.
- (a) 50 — Method: in ab², only the b is squared, so square b first, then multiply by a. Working: b² = 5² = 25, then a × b² = 2 × 25 = 50. Answer: 50. 100 comes from squaring the product ab instead of just b: (2 × 5)² = 100. 20 comes from squaring a instead of b: a² × b = 4 × 5 = 20. 10 comes from ignoring the square altogether and working out a × b = 2 × 5 = 10.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (b) 192 — This is a geometric sequence with first term 3 and common ratio 4: round 2 has 3 × 4 = 12, round 3 has 12 × 4 = 48, round 4 has 48 × 4 = 192. A candidate who applies the ×4 multiplier four times instead of three gets 3 × 4⁴ = 768. A candidate who wrongly treats the growth as arithmetic, taking the round 2 figure of 12 as a fixed amount added each round, gets 3, 15, 27, 39. A candidate who forgets the starting 3 people and just works out 4⁴ gets 256.
- (d) 23 — Method: find the number added each time, then add it to the first term once for every step between the first term and the term wanted. Working: 5 − 2 = 3, 8 − 5 = 3 and so on, so 3 is added each time; the 8th term is seven steps on from the 1st term, so it is 2 + 7 × 3 = 2 + 21. Answer: 23, which agrees with counting on from the 5th term: 14, 17, 20 and then one step more. The distractors: 26 comes from adding the common difference eight times instead of seven, 2 + 8 × 3; 20 comes from stopping one term early, at the 7th term; 24 comes from multiplying the position by the common difference, 8 × 3, and ignoring the fact that the sequence starts at 2 rather than at 3.
- (d) Isla is right, because 5 + 1 = 6 — Method: put the input through the machine yourself, then compare what comes out with the output claimed, and check that the reason given with the verdict is itself true. Working: the machine adds 1 to whatever is put in, so an input of 5 gives 5 + 1 = 6, which is exactly the output claimed. Answer: Isla is right, and the reason is that 5 + 1 = 6. The distractors: the statement that the machine adds 1 to its output describes a different machine — this one adds 1 to what goes in — so the verdict is right but the reason is false; 5 − 1 = 4 comes from running the machine backwards and subtracting instead of adding; 5 × 1 = 5 comes from reading ‘adds 1’ as ‘multiplies by 1’, which leaves the input unchanged.
- (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.