Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
- (b) (x − 5)(x + 2) — We need two numbers that multiply to −10 and add to −3: these are −5 and 2, since −5 × 2 = −10 and −5 + 2 = −3. So x² − 3x − 10 = (x − 5)(x + 2). A candidate who swaps the signs, using +5 and −2, gets (x + 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² + 3x − 10 — the wrong middle term. A candidate who picks the factor pair 1 and 10 instead of 2 and 5 gets (x − 10)(x + 1), which expands to x² − 9x − 10. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets (x − 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² − 7x + 10 — the wrong sign on the constant term.
- (b) 8 — The perimeter is 2(x + (x + 3)) = 4x + 6, so 4x + 6 = 38, which gives 4x = 32 and x = 8. A candidate who forgets the '+3' and treats the rectangle as a square, solving 2(2x) = 38, gets x = 9.5. A candidate who forgets to double the sum of the sides, solving 2x + 3 = 38, gets x = 17.5. A candidate who uses 3x instead of x + 3 for the length, solving 2(x + 3x) = 38, gets x = 4.75.
- (c) 32 — The terms are 60, 53, 46, 39, 32 — each found by subtracting 7 from the term before, so the 5th term is 32. Subtracting 7 five times from the first term instead of four times, 60 − 7 × 5 = 25, treats the first term as if it came before the sequence starts. Adding 7 four times instead of subtracting, 60 + 7 × 4 = 88, uses the wrong operation. Stopping one term early gives the 4th term, 39.
- (b) 3 + 2m — Method: add the fixed fee to the cost of the miles travelled. Working: the miles cost 2 × m = 2m pounds, and the fixed fee is £3, so the total is 3 + 2m. Answer: 3 + 2m. 2 + 3m comes from swapping which number is the fixed fee and which is the per-mile rate. 5 + m comes from adding the fixed fee and the rate together into one number, 3 + 2 = 5, before adding the miles, instead of multiplying the rate by the number of miles. 5m comes from multiplying that combined total by the miles, treating the whole £5 as if it were a per-mile rate.
- (c) 6 — Method: substitute the value, work out the top of the fraction first, then the division, and add the 3 last. Working: the top gives 10 − 4 = 6, dividing by 2 gives 6 ÷ 2 = 3, and adding 3 gives 3 + 3 = 6. Answer: 6. The distractors: 11 comes from dividing only the 4 by 2 instead of the whole of the top, giving 10 − 2 + 3; 4.5 comes from dividing the + 3 by 2 as well, giving (10 − 4 + 3) ÷ 2; 0 comes from subtracting the wrong way round on the top, giving (4 − 10) ÷ 2 = −3 and then −3 + 3.
- (d) 8(7x − 3) — Method: find the highest common factor of the two terms, write it in front of a bracket and divide each term by it. Working: 56 = 8 × 7 and 24 = 8 × 3, so the highest common factor is 8; dividing gives 56x ÷ 8 = 7x and 24 ÷ 8 = 3, and the subtraction sign stays between them. Answer: 8(7x − 3), which multiplies back out to 56x − 24. The distractors: 8(7x + 3) comes from dropping the minus sign of −24 while dividing; 8(56x − 3) comes from dividing only the number term by 8 and leaving 56x untouched inside the bracket; 8(7x − 16) comes from subtracting 8 from 24 instead of dividing 24 by 8.
- (b) 20 — The rate is the gradient: the change in litres divided by the change in time. From 2 to 7 minutes, the tank gains 150 − 50 = 100 litres over 7 − 2 = 5 minutes, so the rate is 100 ÷ 5 = 20 litres per minute. 100 comes from working out the change in litres but forgetting to divide by the change in time. 25 comes from using only the first reading, 50 ÷ 2, and ignoring the second reading entirely. 0.05 comes from dividing the change in time by the change in litres instead of the other way round, 5 ÷ 100.
- (b) y = 7 — Method: one of the equations already gives the value of x, so that value is substituted into the other equation. Working: replacing x with 2 in x + y = 9 gives 2 + y = 9, so y = 9 − 2 = 7. Answer: y = 7, and the pair x = 2 with y = 7 satisfies both equations. The distractors: y = 11 comes from rearranging x + y = 9 as y = 9 + x and adding instead of subtracting; y = 9 comes from ignoring the x term and reading the total as the value of y; y = 4.5 comes from halving 9, as though x and y had to be equal.
- (b) −5 — Method: a point whose x-coordinate is 0 lies on the y-axis, so its y-coordinate is the constant c; once m and c are both known the equation can be written down and x substituted into it. Working: the line passes through (0, 1), so c = 1 and the equation is y = −3x + 1; substituting x = 2 gives y = −3 × 2 + 1 = −6 + 1 = −5. Answer: −5. The distractors: 7 comes from ignoring the minus sign on the gradient and working out 3 × 2 + 1; 5 comes from working out 3 × 2 = 6 and then using the minus sign to take the constant off the product, 6 − 1 = 5; −7 comes from subtracting the constant instead of adding it, −6 − 1 = −7.
- (b) It is not even an ordinary equation with a solution: expanding the left-hand side gives 3x − 12, and 3x − 12 = 3x − 4 would require −12 = −4, which is never true. — Expanding the left-hand side, 3(x − 4) = 3x − 12. Setting this equal to the right-hand side, 3x − 12 = 3x − 4, gives −12 = −4 once the 3x terms are removed from both sides — a statement that is never true, so no value of x satisfies the equation at all, and it is certainly not an identity. The option about substituting a specific value misunderstands algebraic expansion, which holds for every x, not one chosen value. The option matching the first term wrongly assumes that is enough to prove equivalence. The option about multiplying the 4 by 3 on both sides is nonsensical, since there is only one bracket to expand, on the left-hand side.
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (c) Only x = 5 satisfies 3x + 5 = 20, not every value of x. — 3x + 5 = 20 is only true when x = 5, since 3 × 5 + 5 = 20; for any other value of x the two sides are not equal, so it is an equation, not an identity. Saying it cannot be simplified confuses simplifying with the equation/identity distinction, which is about how many values of x make it true. Saying it has an = sign is not a valid test, since identities are also written with an = or ≡ sign. A number on the right-hand side does not decide it either — what matters is whether both sides match for every value of x, not the form of the right-hand side.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.