Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 4 — Method: compare the equation with the general form y = mx + c after writing the x term first, then read off the coefficient of x. Working: y = 6 + 4x can be written as y = 4x + 6, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = 4. Answer: the gradient is 4. The value 6 comes from reading off the constant, written first in the equation, and treating it as the gradient because it comes before the x term. The value 10 comes from adding the two numbers in the equation, 6 + 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x. The value 24 comes from multiplying the two numbers in the equation, 6 × 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x.
- (d) x = 4 or x = −9 — Since (x − 4)(x + 9) = 0, either x − 4 = 0, giving x = 4, or x + 9 = 0, giving x = −9. A candidate who takes the sign shown in each bracket rather than its opposite gets x = −4 or x = 9. A candidate who makes both solutions negative gets x = −4 or x = −9. A candidate who drops both signs and makes both solutions positive gets x = 4 or x = 9.
- (c) 45 km/h — Method: speed = distance ÷ time = 90 ÷ 2 = 45 km/h. Distractor origins: 180 km/h multiplies distance by time instead of dividing (90 × 2 = 180); 88 km/h subtracts the time from the distance (90 − 2 = 88); 92 km/h adds the time to the distance (90 + 2 = 92).
- (d) 3n + 2 — The common difference is 3 (8−5=3), so the expression starts 3n. To match the first term when n=1, 3×1+c=5, so c=2: the nth term is 3n+2. A candidate who uses the first term itself as the constant, instead of first term minus the common difference, would write 3n+5 (giving 8, 11, 14, 17 — one term too high throughout). A candidate who omits the constant term altogether would write just 3n (giving 3, 6, 9, 12, not matching the sequence at all). A candidate who adds the common difference to n instead of multiplying would write n+3 (giving 4, 5, 6, 7, far too small).
- (a) y = 0 — Method: in the pair (x, y) the first coordinate measures how far left or right of the origin a point is and the second how far above or below the x-axis it is, so a point on an axis has one of those measurements equal to zero. Working: the x-axis is the horizontal line through the origin, so a point sitting on it is neither above nor below that line and its second coordinate is zero, while its first coordinate may be positive, negative or zero. Answer: y = 0. The distractors: x = 0 is the condition for lying on the y-axis, the other axis; x > 0 comes from assuming a point on the x-axis must be to the right of the origin, which is true only of part of that axis; x = y holds only at the origin, which is one point of the x-axis rather than a property shared by all of them.
- (c) the fourth quadrant — Method: read the sign of each coordinate in turn, then count round the regions, which are numbered anticlockwise from the one where both coordinates are positive. Working: the x-coordinate 5 is positive, so A is to the right of the y-axis; the y-coordinate −3 is negative, so A is below the x-axis; right of the y-axis and below the x-axis is the fourth of the four regions. Answer: the fourth quadrant. The distractors: 'the first quadrant' comes from ignoring the minus sign on the y-coordinate and treating the point as (5, 3); 'the second quadrant' comes from writing the pair the wrong way round and locating (−3, 5) instead; 'the third quadrant' comes from assuming that any point with a negative coordinate belongs to the region where the minus signs are, without checking the other coordinate.
- (d) (3, 5) — Method: the quadrant a point lies in is decided by the signs of its two coordinates, and in the first quadrant both coordinates are positive. Working: (−2, 3) has a negative x-coordinate, so it sits to the left of the y-axis; (4, −1) has a negative y-coordinate, so it sits below the x-axis; (−1, −4) has both coordinates negative; only (3, 5) has a positive x-coordinate and a positive y-coordinate. Answer: (3, 5). The distractors: (−2, 3) is chosen by candidates who check only the y-coordinate and take a positive height as enough; (4, −1) is chosen by those who check only the x-coordinate; (−1, −4) is chosen by those who number the quadrants from the bottom left, so that the region with two negative coordinates is called the first.
- (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
- (c) 10x − 15 — Expand the bracket first: 3(2x − 5) = 6x − 15. Then add the 4x: 6x − 15 + 4x = 10x − 15. The option 10x − 5 comes from forgetting to multiply the 5 inside the bracket by 3 (treating it as 6x − 5), then adding 4x. The option 10x + 15 comes from a sign error when expanding, treating 3 × (−5) as +15 instead of −15, then adding 4x. The option 6x − 15 comes from expanding the bracket correctly but forgetting to add the 4x term at all.
- (b) y decreases towards zero but never reaches it — Method: as x gets larger, dividing 20 by a bigger number gives a smaller result, so y decreases; because 20/x can never be exactly zero for any positive x, the curve gets closer to zero without ever reaching it, so y decreases towards zero but never reaches it. Distractor origins: 'y increases towards a limit but never reaches it' has the relationship backwards, treating y as increasing when it is actually decreasing; 'y decreases at a steady rate and reaches zero' wrongly assumes the graph behaves like a straight line that eventually hits zero; 'y stays the same however large x becomes' wrongly assumes there is no change in y at all.
- (d) x = 3 — The table is symmetrical about the turning point: y = 0 at both x = 1 and x = 5, and the lowest value, y = −4, occurs exactly halfway between them, at x = 3. Choosing x = 5 picks one of the roots rather than the midpoint between them. Choosing x = 1 picks the other root for the same reason. Choosing x = 6 picks the x-value where y returns to its starting value of 5, which is not the turning point.
- (d) (0, −10) — The y-intercept occurs where x = 0. Substituting x = 0 into y = x² + 3x − 10 gives y = 0 + 0 − 10 = −10, so the graph crosses the y-axis at (0, −10). The option (0, 3) mistakenly uses the coefficient of x instead of the constant term. The option (0, 10) makes a sign error, dropping the negative from the constant term. The option (−10, 0) swaps the x- and y-coordinates, which would instead be a point on the x-axis, not the y-axis.
- (c) 4x − 3 — Subtract each term inside the bracket: 5x − (x + 3) = 5x − x − 3 = 4x − 3. Writing 4x + 3 comes from subtracting the x but not the 3, keeping its sign positive. Writing 6x − 3 comes from adding the x term, 5x + x = 6x, instead of subtracting it. Writing 5x − 3 comes from ignoring the x term inside the bracket and only subtracting the 3.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (b) 1215 — Method: generate the terms one at a time with the term-to-term rule and compare each with 1000 as you go, stopping at the first one that passes it. Working: the terms are 5, then 5 × 3 = 15, then 45, then 135, then 405, and 405 × 3 = 1215; 405 is still below 1000 while 1215 is above it. Answer: 1215. The distractors: 405 comes from stopping at the last term that is still below 1000 instead of giving the first one above it; 3645 comes from carrying on one term too far, past the first term that passes 1000; 2187 comes from using the multiplier 3 as the first term as well, generating 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, 729, 2187 instead of the sequence described.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.