Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) An identity, because it is true for every value of x — Expanding the brackets multiplies both terms inside by 4, giving 4x + 12, which is exactly the right-hand side. The two sides are therefore equal whatever x is, and a statement true for every value of the letter is an identity. An equation is true only for particular values, and trying to solve this one leads to 0 = 0, which places no restriction on x at all. Being able to expand brackets is not what makes a statement an identity, since any equation with brackets can be expanded. Nor is it a formula: a formula links two different quantities, and only one letter appears here.
- (c) 19 — Method: set up the equation 15 + 9n = 186, then subtract the deposit and divide by the cost per student. Working: 9n = 186 − 15 = 171; n = 171 ÷ 9 = 19. Answer: 19 students. 20.67 comes from dividing the whole £186 by £9 without first subtracting the deposit: 186 ÷ 9 ≈ 20.67. 11.8 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £9 and dividing by £15: (186 − 9) ÷ 15 = 11.8. 22.33 comes from adding the deposit instead of subtracting it: (186 + 15) ÷ 9 ≈ 22.33.
- (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.
- (d) y = 4 — Method: substitute x = 6 into y = 24/x: y = 24 ÷ 6 = 4. Distractor origins: y = 18 subtracts instead of dividing (24 − 6 = 18); y = 144 multiplies instead of dividing (24 × 6 = 144); y = 30 adds instead of dividing (24 + 6 = 30).
- (d) 4 — Method: compare the equation with the general form y = mx + c after writing the x term first, then read off the coefficient of x. Working: y = 6 + 4x can be written as y = 4x + 6, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = 4. Answer: the gradient is 4. The value 6 comes from reading off the constant, written first in the equation, and treating it as the gradient because it comes before the x term. The value 10 comes from adding the two numbers in the equation, 6 + 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x. The value 24 comes from multiplying the two numbers in the equation, 6 × 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x.
- (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
- (d) x = 6 — Method: with an unknown on both sides, first collect the x terms on one side by subtracting the smaller x term from both sides, then deal with the numbers. Working: subtracting x from both sides gives x + 7 = 13, and subtracting 7 from both sides gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 20 comes from adding 7 to 13 instead of subtracting it once the x terms have been collected; x = 2 comes from collecting the x terms by adding them, giving 3x + 7 = 13 and then 3x = 6; x = −6 comes from subtracting 2x from both sides to get 7 = −x + 13, reaching −6 = −x and then copying the sign straight across instead of dividing by −1.
- (d) (3, 5) — Method: the quadrant a point lies in is decided by the signs of its two coordinates, and in the first quadrant both coordinates are positive. Working: (−2, 3) has a negative x-coordinate, so it sits to the left of the y-axis; (4, −1) has a negative y-coordinate, so it sits below the x-axis; (−1, −4) has both coordinates negative; only (3, 5) has a positive x-coordinate and a positive y-coordinate. Answer: (3, 5). The distractors: (−2, 3) is chosen by candidates who check only the y-coordinate and take a positive height as enough; (4, −1) is chosen by those who check only the x-coordinate; (−1, −4) is chosen by those who number the quadrants from the bottom left, so that the region with two negative coordinates is called the first.
- (d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
- (d) (0, −7) — At the y-axis, x = 0, so y = 2(0) − 7 = −7, giving the point (0, −7). A candidate who drops the negative sign on the constant term would write (0, 7). A candidate who swaps the coordinates, confusing the y-intercept with an x-intercept, would write (−7, 0). A candidate who uses the gradient, 2, as the x-coordinate instead of 0 would write (2, −7).
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (a) P = 100I / (RT) — Method: undo the operations done to P in reverse order — multiply by 100, then divide by R and by T. Working: I = PRT/100, so 100I = PRT, so P = 100I / (RT). Answer: P = 100I / (RT). P = IRT/100 comes from leaving R and T in the numerator instead of moving them to the denominator. P = 100RT/I comes from swapping P and I when rearranging. P = 100I/R comes from dividing by R only and forgetting to also divide by T.
- (c) 5n + 7 — Method: find the common difference between the rows, then find the constant by adjusting the first row's total. Working: each row has 5 more seats than the last, so the coefficient of n is 5. The constant is the first row's total minus the common difference: 12 − 5 = 7. Answer: the nth term is 5n + 7. 5n + 12 comes from using row 1's total, 12, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 5n + 2 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (12 − 5 − 5 = 2) instead of once. 7n + 5 comes from swapping the common difference and the constant.
- (a) y = −2x + 7 — Using y = −2x + c, and substituting the point (3, 1): 1 = −2(3) + c, so 1 = −6 + c, and c = 7, giving y = −2x + 7. A candidate who uses the y-coordinate of the point directly as the y-intercept, instead of solving for c, would write y = −2x + 1. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient would write y = 2x + 7. A candidate who makes a sign error when isolating c, writing c = 1 − 6 = −5 instead of c = 1 + 6 = 7, would write y = −2x − 5.
- (c) The cost, in pounds, for each extra gigabyte of data used — In C = 15 + 2g, the number multiplying g is the gradient, which gives the extra cost for each extra unit of g — here, £2 for each extra gigabyte. 'The fixed monthly fee, in pounds' describes the constant term 15, not the coefficient of g. 'The total number of gigabytes included in the plan' misreads the coefficient as a quantity of data rather than a cost per gigabyte. 'The cost … for each extra 2 gigabytes' doubles the unit the coefficient actually applies to — it is the cost for each single extra gigabyte.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.