Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) x = 5 — Method: every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate however far up or down the line it lies, so the equation of a vertical line fixes x at a number and does not involve y at all. Working: of the four equations only x = 5 fixes x; it is satisfied by (5, 0), (5, 1), (5, 7) and by every other point whose x-coordinate is 5, and those points form a vertical line. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: y = 5 fixes the y-coordinate instead of the x-coordinate, which gives a horizontal line; y = 5x is a line through the origin with gradient 5, steep but not vertical, and it has a different y-value for every x; x = y fixes neither coordinate and is the line through the origin with gradient 1.
- (d) £20 — Let f be the joining fee and m the monthly fee: f + 3m = 100 and f + 6m = 160. Subtracting the first equation from the second eliminates f: 3m = 60, so m = 20. A candidate who finds the joining fee instead of the monthly fee would get f = 100 − 3(20) = £40. A candidate who divides Ben's total by his number of months, ignoring that part of the cost is a fixed joining fee, would get 160 ÷ 6 ≈ £26.67. A candidate who divides the difference in cost by the total number of months instead of the difference in months would get (160 − 100) ÷ 9 ≈ £6.67.
- (a) x = 4, y = −3 — Method: both equations contain +y with the same coefficient, so subtracting one equation from the other removes y. Working: (2x + y) − (x + y) = 5 − 1 gives x = 4; substituting x = 4 into x + y = 1 gives 4 + y = 1, so y = −3. Answer: x = 4, y = −3, which also satisfies 8 − 3 = 5. The distractors: x = 4, y = 5 comes from rearranging x + y = 1 as y = 1 + x; x = −2, y = 3 comes from eliminating x by doubling the first equation and then reading −y = 3 as y = 3; x = 6, y = −5 comes from adding the constants instead of subtracting them while eliminating y, taking x as 5 + 1.
- (c) (2, 5) — Reflecting in the x-axis keeps the x-coordinate the same and changes the sign of the y-coordinate: Q = (2, 5). (−2, −5) comes from reflecting in the y-axis instead, which changes the sign of the x-coordinate. (−2, 5) comes from reflecting in both axes. (2, −5) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (b) 32 km — Method: work out the scale factor connecting the two mile values: 20 miles is 4 times 5 miles (20 ÷ 5 = 4), so multiply the km value by 4 too: 8 × 4 = 32 km. Distractor origins: 24 km comes from subtracting the mile values (20 − 5 = 15), dividing by 5 to get a wrong scale factor of 3, then multiplying 8 × 3; 23 km comes from adding the difference in miles, 15, directly to the km value, 8; 16 km comes from using a scale factor of 2, doubling the km value once instead of scaling by the correct factor of 4.
- (c) s = P / 4 — Method: undo the multiplication by 4 by dividing both sides by 4. Working: P = 4s, so dividing both sides by 4 gives s = P / 4. The value s = 4P comes from multiplying by 4 instead of dividing — using the wrong inverse operation. The value s = P + 4 comes from adding 4 instead of dividing. The value s = P − 4 comes from subtracting 4 instead of dividing.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (d) h = 2A / (a + b) — Method: undo the multiplication by 1/2 by multiplying both sides by 2, then undo the multiplication by (a + b) by dividing both sides by it. Working: A = (a + b)h / 2, so multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = (a + b)h, then dividing both sides by (a + b) gives h = 2A / (a + b). The value h = A / (a + b) comes from forgetting to multiply by 2 to clear the 1/2 first. The value h = 2A / a + b comes from dividing only by a and leaving b outside the fraction, instead of dividing by the whole bracket (a + b). The value h = (a + b) / (2A) comes from inverting the fraction.
- (a) 9 — Method: the gaps in this sequence are not constant, so work out each of the two terms named from the rule and then subtract the earlier from the later. Working: the 5th term is 5² + 1 = 25 + 1 = 26 and the 4th term is 4² + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17, so the difference is 26 − 17. Answer: 9. The distractors: 7 comes from using the 3rd and 4th terms, one position too early, 17 − 10; 11 comes from using the 5th and 6th terms, one position too late, 37 − 26; 1 comes from subtracting the position numbers, 5 − 4, instead of the terms themselves.
- (b) 3p — p + p + p means three lots of p added together, and repeated addition of the same term is written as a coefficient: 3p. Writing p³ mistakes the repeated addition for repeated multiplication, as if the expression had been p × p × p. Writing 3 + p adds the number of terms (3) onto p as a separate constant, instead of writing 3 as a coefficient of p. Writing just p forgets to count the terms at all, as though repeating the same letter makes no difference. The simplified expression is 3p.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (d) (0, −7) — At the y-axis, x = 0, so y = 2(0) − 7 = −7, giving the point (0, −7). A candidate who drops the negative sign on the constant term would write (0, 7). A candidate who swaps the coordinates, confusing the y-intercept with an x-intercept, would write (−7, 0). A candidate who uses the gradient, 2, as the x-coordinate instead of 0 would write (2, −7).
- (d) 4y — Method: the perimeter is the total distance round the outside of the shape, and a square has four sides all of the same length. Working: the four sides are y, y, y and y, so the perimeter is y + y + y + y, which is written as 4y. Answer: 4y. The distractors: 2y comes from adding only two of the four sides, as if the square were being treated like a rectangle with one length and one width; y² comes from working out the area of the square, y × y, instead of its perimeter; y + 4 comes from adding 4 to the side length instead of multiplying the side length by 4.
- (a) 2 — The common ratio is 54 ÷ 162 = 1/3, confirmed by 18 ÷ 54 = 1/3 and 6 ÷ 18 = 1/3. The next term is 6 × 1/3 = 2. A candidate who wrongly treats the sequence as arithmetic and subtracts the last difference (18 − 6 = 12) again gets 6 − 12 = −6. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing, effectively reversing the sequence, gets 18. A candidate who guesses the ratio is 1/2 gets 6 × 1/2 = 3.
- (c) No — that moment has already passed — Method: call the number of years from now x, add x to both ages, form the equation from the comparison and then interpret the value of x that comes out. Working: in x years Harry will be 14 + x and Mia will be 8 + x, so 14 + x = 2(8 + x); expanding gives 14 + x = 16 + 2x, and subtracting x and 16 from both sides gives x = −2. A negative value of x places the moment two years in the past, when Harry was 12 and Mia was 6 and 12 = 2 × 6, so it is not something still to come. Answer: no — that moment has already passed. The distractors: the claim that it has never happened and never will comes from reaching x = −2 and reading a negative number of years as no solution at all, when x = −2 does not say that no such moment exists but says where it is — two years before now; the claim that it happens when Harry is 16 comes from doubling Mia's present age, 2 × 8 = 16, and reading that as the age Harry has to reach; the claim that it happens when Harry is 20 comes from expanding 2(8 + x) as 8 + 2x, doubling only the x, which gives x = 6.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.